Silent Hill (2006) torrents full movies


Silent Hill

A little girl who doesn't get enough sleep wakes up every night screaming "silent hill

Silent Hill is the best movies torrent of FangFap. This movie was introduced in 2006. There are many actors in this movie torrents, such as Sean Bean, Jodelle Ferland, Laurie Holden, Radha Mitchell. Movie' genres are Action, Adventure, Horror, Mystery. The rating is 6.6 in This is really a good movies torrent. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 125 minutes. NickDan is good uploader, he is very fast. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Awesome', so what is your thought. Do you know what are users? Maria Ozawa is the best. I can't fight my iPhone screen. Share this movies torrent to support us . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

Through all those atrocities and lack of trust, her daughter is living the biggest nightmare of her life. " One day her mother, driving through a thick fog, loses her daughter in a parallel world which hell itself would just not tolerate. A little girl who doesn't get enough sleep wakes up every night screaming "silent hill

Silent Hill torrents

Silent Hill full movie

Silent Hill2006 torrent

Silent Hill torrent, Silent Hill movie torrents, download Silent Hill full movie, Silent Hill2006 torrents, download Silent Hill2006 torrents, watch Silent Hill movie, Silent Hill englishsub, free download Silent Hill movie, movie Silent Hill torrent

Download   Silent Hill720p16438801.18 MB
Download   Silent Hill1080p87441.6 GB

You may also like

Users reviews

Daniel M (de)

One only hopes that The Battle of the Five Armes will give us the kind of ending that we deserve. But all these improvements are ultimately balanced out or overshadowed by equally big flaws. There's still a great deal of fun to be had watching it, and it contains many improvements which should be celebrated. The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is a heavily flawed second instalment of a trilogy which is a shadow of its predecessor. Here, the ending feels altogether arbitrary, as though Jackson had cut where Del Toro would have cut but hadn't rewritten the script around it. Frodo and Sam's journey had reached a point where the trials they had survived were balanced by the scale of what was still facing them, enabling the film to stand on its own. The final climax itself is a little too long, but the film fails where The Two Towers succeeded in having an end-point of tension and catharsis. This point is further illustrated by the ending, which is very unsatisfying. Perhaps it would have been better to do as was originally envisioned by Jackson and Guillermo del Toro, namely to create a very different universe in one film and then bridge that universe with that of Lord of the Rings in another. Criticisms like this all point to an underlying question: would it have been better to just give us The Hobbit, on its own with none of the appendices, and let it be a lesser film? The Hobbit is by its very nature a weaker story than Lord of the Rings, and trying to make it closer to the latter by filling in gaps is good for fans but not so good for storytelling. Her relationship with Kili doesn't go anywhere, nor does it successfully convey the message about the need for closer ties between the races. Notwithstanding her political symbolism, she comes across as a Mary Sue whose dialogue often resembles fan fiction. While the filmmakers can therefore claim to be enacting his wishes, Tauriel as a character is poorly written. Tolkien reportedly tried towards the end of his life to rewrite key parts of his books to make the female characters more active. Another big problem with Desolation is that the romance elements don't work. Either way, these scenes lack the physicality of the battles in Lord of the Rings, and the molten gold is so fake-looking that you wonder whether George Lucas has snuck onto the set. It's hard to say whether the increased use of green-screen was a creative decision on Jackson's part or a studio mandate to keep down the already huge budget. Too many of the wide shots and battle sequences are obviously green-screen, in that they consist of actors running around somewhat aimlessly, looking for their marks. While Smaug himself may be stupendous, many of the other effects are not. But Jackson does a very good job, aided by Benedict Cumberbatch's sinister performance and wonderful delivery. This could have been very disappointing: notwithstanding the silliness of the Rankin Bass version, the darkness of the Lonely Mountain could have deprived us of his beauty, just as many (wrongly) held that Baz Luhrmann's editing in Moulin Rouge! deprived us of seeing the spectacular sets. One of the big tests of Desolation was going to be the introduction of its title character. The barrel sequence is especially fun, particularly Bombur's antics of rolling between the banks of the river while taking out a multitude of orcs. But Jackson still has a knack for creating interesting character pains and deaths, something in which he has excelled since the days of Bad Taste and Brain Dead. They do have more of a video game sensibility than their Lord of the Rings counterparts, being shot more from a first-person stance and with more unusual camera angles. As with the first film, the set-pieces in Desolation are generally very good. Even though it's still much too long, we aren't quite so conscious of it this time around. This film, by contrast, starts off very briskly and keeps the pace up all the way through. The first film badly dragged in a way that The Fellowship of the Ring didn't, possibly because it took a long time to adjust to Jackson's approach with weaving in the extra material. In addition to there being more subext, Desolation also benefits from better pacing. If we accept this logic, it is possible to view Desolation as a partial allegory for World War I; the events take place many years before Lord of the Rings, and the Mirkwood elves' isolationism and detachment from the world around them is akin to similar practices by the USA. While Tolkien did not intend for such conclusions to be drawn, there are parallels and through-lines throughout the work - for instance, regarding the two towers of Orthanc and Barad-Dr as the twin mights of Germany and Russia, waging war on peaceful people from two sides. The Lord of the Rings is often cited or described as an allegory for World War II, something which I explored in my reviews. The community is faced with a stark political choice: either they shut themselves in from the growing evil and hope to withstand it, or they actively fight against it to safeguard an unknown future. The aloof isolationism practised by their leader Thranduil is contrasted by Tauriel's compulsion to intervene in other peoples' wars. There is a political point in all of this too, illustrated by the position of the Mirkwood elves. The Middle Earth in Desolation is being gradually destroyed by self-interest in increasingly ruthless forms: its stories are driven and dominated by people who will do whatever they have to, by whatever means necessary, to obtain, increase or avoid losing what they covet. Bilbo's growing greed towards possession of the ring is matched by the Master's corrupt political hold on Laketown, Thorin's obsession with reclaiming Erebor, Smaug's proud hold over the dwarves' riches, and the Necromancer's business in Dol Goldur. Through the darkening tone, the film illuminates the underlying theme of greed, which all the major characters come to embody. The success of this latter section could also be used to justify Jackson's decision to draw on the appendices - but we shall come to that a little later. Here, there is the underlying feeling of a gathering darkness, reflected in both the journey of the dwarfs and Gandalf's investigations of the Necromancer. One of the big problems with An Unexpected Journey was its flipping back and forth between the light-hearted frolics of The Hobbit itself and the darker, more serious matter gleaned from the Lord of the Rings appendices. On the good side, the film seems tonally a lot more sure of itself. But it's still encumbered by the same narrative flaws of the first film, which the higher stakes unfortunately amplify. The sequel to An Unexpected Journey does bring a number of improvements to the table, teasing out a little more subtext from the novel and solving some of the tonal problems. With The Desolation of Smaug (Desolation hereafter), we are now able to get a more accurate picture of the artistic and narrative intentions of the trilogy. As I explained, this was necessary in dealing with a lot of the baggage thatcomes with comparisons with The Lord of the Rings, which the film inevitably invites. I spent a lot of my review (both versions of it) addressing audience expectations of the film rather than reviewing the film itself, at least not as directly as perhaps I would normally. In my original review of the first Hobbit film, An Unexpected Journey, I concluded by saying that we couldn't entirely judge it without the context of its subsequent sequels

Eddie G (nl)

nyway some part of movie are good, some boring and some average so u got 3 star movie at end :). . . three in one, like ness caffe

Frances H (fr)

Excellent crime/courtroom drama with James Woods showing off his acting chops the whole way, but look for Kurtwood Smith from That 70s Show giving a button down performance as the DA

Galvy F (de)

essage-5. 0Level of Interest-5Complexity-5Timing-5Twist & Turns-4. 0Screenplay-5Acting-4. 5Directing-5Music-3. Visuals-4. *When not every order a high ranked American makes is America. When we have the choice of being Dead in the sky, dead at heart, or dead outside your uniform with civilian life, war has its good kill eventually. Once you are out, then they can't target you anymore. When we will never stop targeting you as you to us, but we make way for the next group to take over and go our separate ways. When we still have 1 last person to target, those who is our and others enemy and ourself. When whatever we can salvage from this destruction, we target to rebuild. When for some targets, they have some time to back away. When some targets we saw a mile away, and couldn't do anything sooner to stop it, when its too late to back away and your left the intended target. When we are targetted because of what we do, that we can't g back to civilian standards. When others don't know why you would deliberately miss a target, but only follow the rules of law to say that you broke the law. When we are targetted, because we are too good of a soldier that others need to put down. When some targets are starting to all look alike that, our minds explode in differentiating that we justify all our targets as justifiable. When hitting targets is exhausting enough, that our morality takes control before it explodes restablishes the target of our mind is safe. When we wish we had our sights on different targets but we stand down. When targets get harder to acquire when the people learn our tactics and not be open targets. When what we do targets more then we are able to handle when it effects us, our family and everyone around us. When your targets are others targets, when being together means we are a team. When targeting whomever, justifying whatever, and signing off is part of the job. When we are targeting innocent lives to draw the enemies. When our thoughts of the most idealistic target takes us there. When the only target we want to hit is ourselves for where we are, how we are seen, and all that went wrong with our decisions and planning. When we are targeting unintended targets and we are living with it. When we don't want to be targetted for another thing we can't s a mile away. When some targets we don't miss out and about. When we can't see and they can't see when the next attack move will be made, we are all walk, sitting or sleeping targets. When we just don't know when being targetted will come. When some targets we can't help not stand being on, but we make the most of it. When we are always targeted when we are weak, defenceless and give what we want without a fight. When we are always targeted when we are the ones whom are always letting their loved one down. When we are always targeting our own moral actions and mind set to be proud of ourselves. When we are targeted when we are both on the ground, in air and at Bae to know what's it like. When we are targeted to do the job when we can go all night watching and have others back. When the next target is the enemy not copying the same battle tactics as we do. When the next target of war is the enemies play, when we have all weapons targeting them to not make a move, or if they might make imminent moves they will die. When we can justify any target as any threat and say it's justified. When some targets we know where to stay way when we are definitely not wanted. When we do out of love we put much hatred towards it so w target the right enemy, no one else. When we are targeted when we are hated. When some targets keep us awake at night, or don't when we are trying to hit the many targets that overwhelm us. When some targets we don't miss, when we were once in their shoes to know and relate. When we miss out on so much, because we have high hopes for some targets to come by. When some targets we miss intentionally or when intoxicated when they don't matter. When we miss targets on purpose, when we are red hot and cant miss us. When we have other targets in mind, our selves when we enjoy the fear of death that gives us the thrill. When we are targeted, we know we are when we take it up a notch. When we have other targets in mind to narrow our scope to our own teammates. When we know we are not being targeted. When any order is justifiable when we are always against our enemies and always targeting them, like them to us. When war targets our opinions, views, and direction of right from wrong, that we follow orders and blow up whatever we have in mind. When we can easily be targets for following orders but considered a war crime for our actions. When we can easily be targets for not following orders, and held accountable for our actions. When there is a loophole in the system we are not targeting to resolve, we are told to follow orders no questions asked. When we are easy targets when we are a secret, and cant say a word to be called into question. When we don't understand the justifications of war, to know we are not randomly targeting civilians on orders we don't confirm too. When we target others to do our job, so we don't have to get our hands dirty. When our sole purpose is to save lives and end lives and not take credit or say a word. When some targets we miss when we don't understand or care the justification of our actions. When some targets are never meant to survive. When our targets are getting bigger, and we are the best suited when we get the job done. When what we do, we are targetted to do more, and target more based on suspicious behaviour. When we are following new orders, once we been targetted for specified combat instructions. When we reach our targets sometimes we don't feel a thing. When we work as a team, and our decisions to target is all the teams decision to target. When our job gives us plenty to think about, hit many targets that far reach our mind, but others are far from our radar to know exactly. When some targets we wish to hit, we don't wish to hit the untargetted ones. When our targets are popping everywhere and we are always fighting. When some targets are more of greater importance than others. When we have to always commit to our targets, and have one over our bed as a reminder of what we have to hit as good Catholics/Christians. When something has been targeting our mind for along time, that we take a solo mission alone until it's achieved. When living the life we commit to, we are targeting one direction that we cannot go back from. When we had another target along we kept secret, that we don't reveal so others wouldn't try targeting us. When we are not a target, because we don't have a reason to be targeted. When we are a hot target waiting to be hit on by others, but gets unintended cross fire. When we can't hit some targets when they are not part of the objective. When some targets others get, are more forced when you can come and go as you please and abuse your targets when you think less of them. When some people and places are inhospitable, that males hitting targets difficult and timely when we are always watching and waiting to hit. When some targets are harder to hit, when we are hiding or undercover when we know we are being seen. When we can't hit all our less severe targets. When some targets are harder to reach when they dodge away or make themselves a target to be reached. When our targets are easier to hit, when we reached top ranks at a fast pace and age. When some targets that seem hard are easier to hit for some. When our targets are set on far more faster, threatening and equipped weaponry to hit our targets better. When we target top recruits straightway to go into battle and transition them to real life simulations. When we targeting more then we intend to, when we targeting advancement of weaponry. When we are targeting young recruits everyday to fight the long fight of war, and trying to advance our forces and technology along the process. When we are a target by the media when what we do is not fair and critical practice of war. When we are trying to hit as much targets as we can, when we are trying to save lives from going in. When our less severe targets we don't hit when they get away, or our mind isn't into it and somewhere else. When some targets we aim to improve others on or put focus towards fixing up. When hitting targets runs in the family when we fight. When some targets are less severe when we want to go home. When some targets, it's about the eye on the prize. When some targets are easily seen, when we are uniformed in it. When we are serving our country, we are targets, outside of our country we are targets. When we are part of the highest target killings using unmanned aerial vehicles. Good Kill When in war, we acquire targets to destroy

Jerad M (au)

More of a 'how the f did this movie even get released to dvd' kind of movie. Not in a 'it's so bad it's funny' kind of way. This movie was one of the worst movies I have ever seen. I enjoy bad horror films as they are amusing at times

johanna s (us)

Over all I do enjoy they way french movies are meade and this is not an exception! The screen play is great and the tension between the odd couple is amazing! Defently worth the 90 minutes of my lfe=)

Kyle C (gb)

RECOMMENDED for Jason Statham fans and fans of action movies. The ending is kind of a letdown with an atrocious line to finish it off but that aside this movie is a lot of fun and definitely worth a watch. When his daughter gets in a fight at school he is pegged as the bad man in town by the other child's parents and is setup to be killed off by the local meth dealer played by James Franco (who is actually quite convincing and menacing), what transpires is an all out blood bath between Statham and the gang out to get him (I wonder who wins). He plays a man who moves to a new town with his daughter but unknown to the people in the town, he is a former undercover cop. Jason Statham plays a man who beats up everyone (Hmmm, I wonder if he's ever played a role like that before, lol) but this time it's not just senseless action and fight scenes. Not quite sure what the title means (which seems to be a theme this year) but that is just a minor flaw in this action packed ride. WOW, that was pretty good

Nathan T (us)

Made-for-tv movies are made for tv because they aren't good enough to make it into a theater. Won't be good. Jonas brothers are terrible music artists and actors, and this is especially true with their fanbase (teenage girls, and not much else)

Sooty M (jp)

Nonetheless, as Krauss so wisely points out, "The lack of an informed public is the greatest threat to democracy," and given the current state of affairs in the world, it would indeed be disastrous for the human race not to embrace reason and public policy based on reality. Unsurprisingly, the advocates are not immune to the vitriol of religious fanatics who demonstrate and champion their intolerance of the scientific worldview, a sign, as suggested by Dawkins, that the religious lobby is getting increasingly desperate. The key message these two emissaries of science deliver echoes what some gadfly said over two thousand years ago (although he died for it): that is that we have to constantly be challenging our own beliefs in order to live a mindful existence. A glimpse of the atheist movement, designed to promote a scientific worldview and rational thinking over dogmatic religious belief, featuring Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss