Six Shooters

Six Shooters

Aballay was a bad tempered gaucho. After killing a man, the terrified look of the victim's son raised his consciousness about his savagery. Years go by, that kid's look doesn't leave him. Aballay knows that the kid will look for him.

Aballay was a bad tempered gaucho. After killing a man, the terrified look of the victim's son raised his consciousness about his savagery. Years go by, that kid's look doesn't leave him. Aballay knows that the kid will look for him. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Six Shooters torrent reviews

Alex G (fr) wrote: Something that could have been interesting takes the most offensive route to make a point.

bill b (fr) wrote: it wont change your life but it is watchable

Mike M (nl) wrote: This movie Still ....An extremely well-acted and smartly directed thriller unlike anything else. The most underrated action film of the last decade.

dianda a (it) wrote: good film i ever watched

Jennifer B (de) wrote: I have GOT to see this :D

Ibraheem M (mx) wrote: This was an unnecessary scene-to-scene update of the 1976 version of "The Omen" but not the worst remake in the world.

Jacky L (ca) wrote: tragic and shocking insight into the afghanistan that was under taliban rule. this felt more like a documentary than a movie actually. the boy who played espandi had great charisma, 'osama' grated on the nerves a lil with her whimpering. one grim watch.

Tiffany T (ag) wrote: bad translations but I love action romantic comedies

Ariel U (de) wrote: I want to get married as soon as possible... Just because I don't want to waste my time in dating. You either have a relationship with someone because it has legs or not at all. Also, because I think monogamy is the 'it' .

Adam R (mx) wrote: A terrible eighties movie. It's just too cheesy and the awful music score is showing its age. (First and only viewing - 1/15/2015)

Derek Johnson (gb) wrote: A flick I watched since I was a kid. Not good graphics at all, but a fun movie. Plus I kinda blame this movie for getting me obsessed with fast cars. A GTO with a blower! Great stuff!

David M (mx) wrote: A Linda Blair classic

Joseph C (ag) wrote: As a great fan of the Hammer series, I found this Terence Fisher sequel to his _Horror of Dracula_ to be very well done. I consider this one to be, perhaps, superior to the first, if for no other reason than its suspenseful structure. Like Harry Lime or Hannibal Lector, Lee's Dracula haunts a good deal of the film without being "physically," so to speak, present on screen. Castle Dracula, too, takes on a center role, as a kind of representation of Dracula himself. Alan Kent (portrayed by Charles Tingwell) has a superb and memorable death scene, hanging upside down, his throat cut open and left to hang like cattle, as his blood restores Dracula to life. What is interesting to me in this film, as it is the second of the Hammer Dracula series, is that Dracula's body may be destroyed, but that it was never alive to begin with -- his undead nature means that he is incapable of being annihilated. There is a fascinating moment when the young English couples (perfectly stereotypical: dull, respectful, stodgy) toast the health of their absent host, Dracula. The lights flicker and the wind blows -- practically inside the castle itself -- a veritable anamnesis of his Spirit itself. As long as something of the world links Dracula -- a ring, his cloak, even the Castle -- there he will always be, at the limbus of human existence. A comforting thought.

Crystal W (ru) wrote: I've seen this movie before I like Shirley Temple movies.

Black F (br) wrote: The reason I decided to become a film maker...

Cameron J (ru) wrote: "Don't you know that she's... she's some kind of monster!" Seriously though, getting back to the opposite side of music, in terms of manliness, let us discuss this tell-all tale of a band of brothers who nearly destroyed each other, and in the process, just killed music instead. Oh wait, that's Nirvana; Metallica wasn't really all that bad, though they had so many fall-flat songs, it's unreal. Hey at the end of the day, they remain hit-or-miss, but mostly, well, not miss, more like horrible, and by extension, about as good as heavy metal is gonna get. So yeah, in case you can't tell, I'm more of an old school rocker (Don't worry, I'm before that lame "She's Some Kind of Wonderful" song), though I know music talent when I see it, and it's been on the decline since the '80s. Still, there were still plenty of people who showed up in the '80s who were still kicking things right, and among that crowd of talent was... well, certainly not Metallica. No, they had their high points, yet on plenty of occasions that grew more and more prevalent over the years (Wow, even metal was decent at a time; that's how bad music got), their music, much like the band's relationship and this uninspired opener (Clearly not a big enough fan of Metallica to care), got pretty bumpy, and in that regard, alone, this documentary stays pretty faithful, as it too is bumpy. The central focus of this documentary is a study on how the band's lives and work have changed over the years, and how that serves detrimental to their relationship and career, and for long periods throughout this film, that is hardly palpable. The film's focus isn't all over the place, yet it does get to be unenven, with so much time spent on pure filler at points - from the band members' personal lives to their working on music -, with little focus on the more human aspects within it, leaving a sense of intrigue to momentarily fall limp, and when conflict does fall back into play, it's often rather jarring. A big culprit behind these missteps appears to be the meditation limiting, spawned from, not necessarily hurried, but frenetic storytelling. The docuemtnary still has plenty of points of slow-down and meditation, yet even at its almost two-and-a-half hour runtime, it often dives fairly swiftly into its next point, or at least not when it's getting repetitive, with an almost inhumanly urgent tone, exacerbated by the relentlessness of the music, and something as intense as heavy metal music, at that. While the film does calm itself down here and there, much of it moves at such a constant and often repetitious tone, leaving it to lose steam and, on occasion, become disengaging. I was with the film for quite a while, but after that while, it all fell from grace and the position of upstanding, never to fully recover. However, as things stand, the film remains worth the sit, as the high points that it does hit are pretty high, thus creating a generally enjoyable documentary, and a competently-produced one, at that. This film could be trimmed down ever so easily to maybe, say, a little over an hour-and-a-half, and it would be better for it, and I'm not just saying that because I was begging for the terrible music to just stop by the one hour mark, so that's a glaring fault in the editing. Other than that, the editing on the film is pretty clever, with smooth trimmings and transitions throughout to give the film a kind of gripping cinematic feel. This, of course, ameliorates the resonance and intrigue that Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky fail to keep consistent, yet deliver on enough for the film to engage more than it falls flat. The film's runtime is much too lengthy and its focus is much too uneven, yet completely falling out of the film is hard to do, for one the film gets a hold of you, while its grip loosens, it doesn't fully release you. As overlong as the scenes of comradery are, they are assembled and emphasized cleverly enough to where you do get a genuine sense of the band's friendship, and when things begin to unravel into tension among the bandmates, I found myself genuinely invested in these people whose craft I never even cared for. It's all so very interesting, seeing the humanity within these very brutal people, and seeing that vulnerability is quite engaging, even if it is an aspect that we've seen in many documentaries of this type. This documentary is neither terribly original nor terribly rewarding, yet is cleverly produced and directed, with a general sense of depth within these musicians, as humans, making it consistently fascinating. Overall, this study is overlong and uneven, spending too much time focusing on other aspects outside of the central point, diluting the intrigue of conflict, something made worse by the film's unrelenting pacing and extreme repetition that leaves it to lose steam, little by little, yet never to where it fully releases you, as the film remains competently edited to where it gives the film a cinematic feel to intensify the general resonance and intrigue formed from the mostly insightful, fascinating storytelling that ultimately leave "Metallica: Some Kind of Monster" to stand as a somewhat conventional, yet ultimately engaging study on the more recent struggles in the lives, careers and relationships within one of the most recognizable bands in the heavy metal industry. 2.5/5 - Fair

Alexander L (ca) wrote: The IdenticalOn youtube there is a video that takes gibberish and puts it together to sound like an English rock song. Supposedly this is what it sounds like to speak English to an Italian who doesn't know it. It's known as "Prisencolinensinainciusol." It says nothing, is entirely nonsensical, and barely sounds good, but is somehow intriguing. All this to say that THE IDENTICAL IS DUMB. When making a movie that is CLEARLY meant to be the life of Elvis... guys if you can't get Elvis's name or music or anything related to him, just scrap your freaking movie. There's nothing to tell. There's nothing to see. The Identical is a bizarre story relating to twin brothers who are separated at birth (with the parents faking the death of one of the siblings because THAT MAKES SENSE INSTEAD OF CLOSED ADOPTION) and one of them grows up to be the greatest rock star of all time: Failvis. I mean Drexel Hemsley. What an inspirational story to tell. Too bad the movie is actually about his twin brother who was raised to believe that Rock N Roll is the Devil Music and his daddy is wanting him to grow up a preacher just like him. THAT'S the story we get. And it's a dumb terrible pathetic story with nothing to see. It's not even amusingly bad. It's just... completely lacking. At least Failvis sounds good. Too bad the lyrics are terrible. 1/10

Darrel T (ru) wrote: Just saw this movie on TV and its lame enough to begin with. There's not much horror or suspense. Unnecessary scenes and plot lines thrown in. and the ending makes you go, "so.. that's it?"