Southwest

Southwest

In a Brazilian coastal village where everything seems motionless, Clarice grasps her life in a single day, unlike those she meets and who are living this day like any other. She tries to ...

In a Brazilian coastal village where everything seems motionless, Clarice grasps her life in a single day, unlike those she meets and who are living this day like any other. She tries to ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Sudoeste.2012.TVRip.XviD.MP3.MKOffHDTV3935945.67 MB
Download   Jules Verne: Master of The World -1976, Classic CartoonOther4232397.92 MB

Southwest torrent reviews

Julien C (au) wrote: Moyen. Histoire maintenant classique d'un ordinateur qui d (C)cide de contrler le monde. Mais comment l'ordinateur si prends est int (C)ressant...moi qui aime le techno.

Diana M (jp) wrote: Pretty good movie. Give young girls a hope of becomming what you want to be if you try hard

Allan C (ru) wrote: There are some nice noir archetypes and I've always like Michael Pare, even if he's something of a one-note performer. I'm also a big Theresa Russell fan, so it's nice to see her in anything since I haven't seen her in much lately. Unfortunately though this film also has some awful performances, a script with some huge plot holes and a very silly twist ending. Probably only worth watching for Pare and Russell fans.

Mike P (mx) wrote: There really isn't anything special about this movie. Nothing in particular stands out. It's just fine Mormon film fun. I will say, member of the church or not, any family can enjoy it. It's silly, the acting isn't obviously the greastest, and but the lesson to learn is whats best.

Liam C (gb) wrote: 'Master and Commander' really does earn its epic status and features a huge and excellent cast. The first thing that I noticed is just how unique this film is, even if, funnily enough, it came out the same year as the first 'Pirates' movie. Even so, just to watch something this creative was great and it just had a great sense of adventure. Russell Crowe really does liven things up in this film and once again gives an excellent performance, showing us once again his versatility and ability at perfecting accents, as well as showcasing method acting once more with learning the violin and he played beautifully. Whilst I was watching I was seeing how well he was doing and it just had to be him playing, and it was. His character was also really funny as well and overall, very well rounded; I think he was snubbed an Oscar nomination because of 'Pirates of the Caribbean', actually. It's still crazy to think Johnny Depp got his first nomination for that film. Paul Bettany once again starring against Crowe does an excellent job also and these two really work well with one another. However, the really well written development these two have isn't really shared by anyone else. The cast was excellently chosen and there are actually quite a lot of characters but we probably spend too much time with too many people because we really don't know a lot about most of them. We're given enough to at least care for them and we do know a little bit about most of them, but for something this grand I expected a little more. I mean, James D'Arcy's character... Who the hell was that? He is one of the most important supporting characters and is supposed to be very important in the ship's ranks but he never really does anything or never really has the screen centred on him for any period of time for us to learn about him. I know he's a good actor but why didn't they use him more? Also, for as fun as this film is trying to be, it seemed like not much happened for significant amounts of time, I was never bored but the pacing of this film is a little off. Within 20 minutes I already started to check the time and that's when I knew something was wrong. After all is said and done the film only ends up being slightly over 2 hours by about 10 minutes but it feels a lot longer than that and that really shouldn't be. I never felt like a lot really happened, I don't need it to be all action to find it engaging but the events that happen in the film seem spaced apart. That wouldn't be a problem if all the characters had development but like I said, there are too many of them to give development to them all. Crowe and Bettany did have a very good relationship and watching them interact was excellent viewing but everyone else didn't really matter that much, but maybe that's how it should be, as Crowe and Bettany are the main characters here. It appeared after a little while that there was going to be a subplot about corruption but that never really went anywhere, like a few of its other themes. That being said, that plotline is overplayed and thankfully this film did have a distinct lack of clichs, scenes where it looked like clichs were being set up thankfully did not happen. Even if there was one scene where two characters say goodbye before battle, and I thought one of them was going to die and they did but it didn't manipulative. The film does have an epic feel and it is quite memorable, it has smart action scenes that are visually dazzling, feature smart tactical planning by the characters that is interesting to watch and felt authentic, it makes sense why it won the Oscars it did. The filmmakers manage to get a lot of mileage out of a film centred in one location, if you'll pardon the pun. I do like the film but I think it could have been a little bit shorter and there is just something about it that doesn't come full circle with me but I can't quite put my finger on it but it certainly isn't a bad film. Peter Weir has excellent direction and puts the pieces together very well and it's a great entry into his very varied filmography; a sequel would be nice to see this great world and these well written, likeable characters again, even if, sadly, they all think it is unlikely. With great performances and perfect attention to detail, 'Master and Commander' is a very unique and enjoyable film, despite what I have said.

Laura G (ag) wrote: I loved it, except for the final ... but I understand the point of view, and is successful

Emile H (ca) wrote: Jackie Chan is such a hero in my eyes, not just because he's broken barriers between Asia and North America, but also he is so committed to his direction that he executes a hell of an action-comedy movie. He plays an equally committed cop who is half loose cannon and half bumbling, which results in some of Hong Kong cinema's amazing stunts and fight scenes. Not to mention, he pulls such great comedy chops, and has no problem being either cunning or playing a fool for most of the time. As a result, the movie may seem very typical of American action comedy movies, but the extreme hurt he puts himself through make for a kick-ass reel on the east side.

NIC0L3 TH0MS (kr) wrote: this movie is about my cousin her husband had been beating her and he came home drunk so she put gas on him and lit him on fire i swear this is about my cousin

Kyle G (kr) wrote: A busy ball of paradoxes: rollicking yet theatrically staid; colorful yet dry (literally and figuratively); timeless yet indebted to history... though not always successfully.

Shameema M (br) wrote: 't happened one night'/'Roman holiday's Indian take and just as effective , FUNNY and sweet.Nargis is a goddess.

Scott P (jp) wrote: The absolute worst movie ever made. The plot doesn't really make sense, the effects are terrible (her head was chopped off and there was NO blood; the "guts" were obviously pieces of meat that you could buy at any grocery store), and the "acting" is horrible. The editing was pretty bad, too. Don't watch this movie. It's not worth it. Seriously.