Stand Up and Fight

Stand Up and Fight

A southern aristocrat clashes with a driver transporting stolen slaves to freedom.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:97 minutes
  • Release:1939
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:escape,   snow,   murder,  

This western starring Beery and Taylor as rivals is one cackling western. It involves the kidnapping and reselling of free slaves. Set in 1812 in the North and a town of abolitionists, the ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Stand Up and Fight torrent reviews

Peter L (au) wrote: My Rating: 4.5/5 stars; Grade: A-; Gesture: Two Thumbs Up; Status: Significantly Terrific (Fresh); Emoticon: :-D.

Nicols T (br) wrote: La nica de las secuelas que tiene una mejor trama que la primera.

Hayden W (fr) wrote: Showcases some of the best deaths in horror movie history.

Navin P (br) wrote: Perhaps Kareena Kapoor's best performance!! Rahul Bose could be better, but overall a movie that simply cannot be missed at any costs... This movie is rivalled only by the movie "Traffic Signal" in terms of a look at the true life of the downtrodden in India!!

gary t (kr) wrote: well umn just seen this movie 4 the 1st time n think that this is a good movie 2 watch....its got a good cast of actors/actressess throughout this movie...i think that paul hogan, pat hingle, frank mcrae, cuba gooding jr, beverly d angelo play good roles/parts throughout this movie...i think that the director of this action/adventure/comedy/western movie had done a good job of directing this movie because you never know what 2 expect throughout this movie its a good comedy/western movie 2 watch with a good cast throughout this movie n its an enjoyable movie 2 watch..its well filmed n the scenery throughout this movie its really kewl thorughout this movie

Vikram T (de) wrote: sunny is terrible actor..but i have few films that were my fav

Terri H (au) wrote: No thankyou - Not interested

RA L (ru) wrote: PAN AND SCAN. Excepcional en todo sentido. Su mordaz ataque a la burguesa a travs del sexo y el erostismo es como pocas cosas que haya visto. La pelcula transcurre a paso seguro (con una extraordinaria actuacin central) hasta un final que es realmente impactante. / Exceptional in every sense. Its mordant attack on the burgeoisie through sex and erotism is like few things I have seen. The film unfolds firmly (with an extraordinary central performance) up until a finale that is truly striking.

Simon D (kr) wrote: If you like Woody Allen then this is a must see. Pretty funny take on dostoyevsky (I assume). Diane Keaton was excellent in this.

Brian B (de) wrote: Another great Thin Man pairing of William Powell and Myrna Loy. Never have I seen a better onscreen pair.

Johnny G (kr) wrote: tv movie, not that good.

Harry W (au) wrote: Though hardly fond of romantic comedies, with Along Came Polly teaming up Ben Stiller with Jennifer Aniston there was enough talent on board to captivate me.Everything about Along Came Polly cries generic writing. Ben Stiller is playing the same neurotic archetype once again, this time with emphasis on the anal obsessions of his character's constant need to assess risk in everything. This gimmick isn't overused, but the story follows a predictable path without much humour to offer along the way. Relying on the intended humour of the chemistry between Ben Stiller and Jennifer Aniston, Along Came Polly lacks any intelligent writing in terms of comedy, romance or even drama. The relationship in Along Came Polly is not compelling which confirms that there is no dramatic virtue in the film, yet the general story still takes itself too seriously to work any humour into its situations. The majority of scenes which are obviously intended as comedy prove to be the scenes where the film moves from romantic comedy conventions to crude gags regardless of the fact that they are forced into the story without consideration for how they might actually fit. The fact is that they don't, and they fail to make viewers laugh or divert their attention away from the fact that there is never any development between the actual chemistry shared by Ben Stiller and Jennifer Aniston. Occasionally, the film breaks away from its story to focus on character's with their own subplots which steps away from the pathetic narrative, but it is too much of a simplistic distraction without enough spirit to transcend the boring nature of the central narrative. The fact that Along Came Polly relies on ridiculous stereotypes who have no relevance to the main story just shows how pathetic the writing is.Although the story in Along Came Polly is so simplistic and forgettable, there is simply one scene I cannot overlook/ The entire point in the film where Polly Prince discovers that Reuben Feffer has listed all her faults so that he can determine whether to choose between her or his cheating wife is actually one of the key dramatic plot points chronicling Jennifer Aniston's character Rachel Green in her starmaking sitcom Friends (1994-2004). The fact that John Hamburg had to actually borrow his dramatic climax for Along Came Polly entirely from a sitcom in which Ben Stiller once appeared in a cameo as a romantic interest of Jennifer Aniston just goes to show the distinctive shortage of originality plaguing the film if it wasn't already clear.The lead actors in Along Came Polly hardly seem interested in where the film is going. Both Ben Stiller and Jennifer Aniston maintain their own brand of awkward attitude in their roles, but there is no sense that they are capable of matching up. There is no feeling of bond established since they both seem so inwardly focused and unable to break free from the generic shackles of their stereotypical attitudes previously established by their countless other roles.Ben Stiller offers nothing of innovation in Along Came Polly. The man has played the same basic neurotic archetype in countless films, yet Along Came Polly offers nothing slightly memorable about him this time. He circulates in the same predictable flaws so repetitively that he never rises beyond the monotonous lack of emotion his character confines him to, having developed his character about as much as he has left viewers laughing. To specify, I mean he's terrible. Along Came Polly is another weak star vehicle which shows that his overfamiliar antics are beginning to fade in quality and that perhaps it's time for a different path.But in all honesty I'm really surprised that I didn't like Jennifer Aniston in Along Came Polly. The comedy great has a tendency to create a naturally likable character in almost any role she takes on, yet Along Came Polly can't decide what to do with her character. She is partially a free spirit yet also an awkward and aimless girl which captures the positive and negative elements of her character's lifestyle. Yet the role is written so shallowly that rather than doing anything with the character, Jennifer Aniston plays the titular Polly Prince as generically as possible. She oscillates between cliches of drama and romantic comedy without being meaningful or funny, and her natural appeal as a comic actress is bogged down by a script that has no idea what to do with her. Jennifer Aniston is miscast in Along Came Polly.Most of the actual comedic success in the film comes from the efforts of the supporting cast. For example, to see an accomplished actor like Academy Award-winner Phillip Seymour Hoffman in the part of a pretentious actor attempting to relive the glory of his one major acting role is just hilarious. He is ridiculously over-the-top and self-obsessive, a role which is so against-type for the man that it is packed with comic glory in a film which really needs it. Phillip Seymour Hoffman's careless and free-spirited nature proves that among his many talents as an actor is the ability to find life in a laugh-free script.And Bryan Brown takes a part which is essentially off in its own world within the narrative. Playing the careless extreme sports-enthusiast Leland Van Lew, Bryan Brown's relevance to the story is very arbitrary. And since the story is joyless and pathetic in the first place, his humourous spirit works as a strong distraction from the pathetically thin writing of the main narrative. As an Australian myself I'll admit that my patriotic bias gives me greater favouritism for the actor, but nevertheless it is clear that he is one of the most energetic members of the cast and proudly takes the chance to go over the top with gleeful energy. Bryan Brown's own series of sketches are among the few things of value in Along Came Polly.Also, I'm sure many people can rejoice at the sight of Hank Azaria's butt.The gleeful comic energy of Phillip Seymour Hoffman and Bryan Brown breathe a modicum of comic energy into Along Came Polly, but it is anchored down by a clich romantic premise which offers no compelling drama or clever humour but rather pretentious characters and misplaced crude jokes.

Joe B (ca) wrote: I saw the first one and hated it! This one was awesome though!

Ben C (kr) wrote: A disappointing follow-up to the 2001 remake, but I didn't hate it. The plot was just too complicated and it seemed illogical at times.

Step E (jp) wrote: I love this movie.Why?Because I love Superman, the original Superman movies 1&2 and what Superman is all about.It's brilliantly simple in it's application while drenched in class and reminds me of what movies brought me in my youth.And yes, you can't quite beat true movie sound and scores. Excellent.It's definitely time for another sequel with Routh, reminding us what Superman should be all about.

Andy C (fr) wrote: A little awkward in parts (even for a found footage movie) but hey....Dinosaurs!

Matthew S (fr) wrote: Wow. This movie is so bad it almost hurts to watch.

(de) wrote: I was highly disappointed with this short. As much as I loved Frozen when it came out in theaters, this was a disappointment and proved that sequels aren't worth it. Because this is the same director that directed Frozen and she makes a mostly unfunny sequel that has lacked almost all of the charm and wit from Frozen.The short leaves questions to be answered. This is so overrated, childish and plays out as a cloying Disney short, which downgraded it.The song just wasn't as memorable as the songs from Frozen. The characters are now silly, and how would Elsa's sneezing cause everyone to use them to make a great birthday??The same writer that wrote Frozen also directed this, and I can say, she doesn't do good directing neither.Anna is turning 19 now. And Elsa has to make up for all the birthdays that she done missed and try to make her the best birthday ever. This was just a bad idea which could've been executed okay.