Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot

Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot

A tough cop's (Sylvester Stallone) seemingly frail mother (Estelle Getty) comes to stay with him and progressively interferes in his life. She buys him an illegal MAC-10 machine pistol and starts poking around in his police cases. Eventually, the film draws to a denouement involving the title of the film and the revelation that even though she seems frail and weak she is capable of strong actions in some circumstances, i.e. when her son is threatened by thugs and she shoots herself in the shoulder.

When top L.A. detective Joe Bomowski gets a rare visit from his feisty mom, Tutti, his life is turned upside-down as she promptly starts trying to fix up his life, much to his embarrassment. But she can also become a great partner to catch a killer. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot torrent reviews

Max M (fr) wrote: Informative. Eye-opening.

(us) wrote: Oh my goodness - society listen up

Wesley W (jp) wrote: A movie that was recommended to me by a family member and a movie I thought was gonna be good, but instead it was a preachy, self-pretentious, depressing mess in my opinion. First I will start off with the positives because most of the review will be me trashing the film after I name it's positives. Adrian Brody did give a great performance in the film and I kept wishing throughout it that the film was as good as he was in it. A few more are that James Caan cracked me up in a weird hilarious scene and the young prostitute who hung out with Adrian Brody's character did do good at showing emotions when things got tough with her. Now on with the negatives because there are a ton. First off, the movie has way too many plot lines going on and it has way too many characters including some who are only in a few scenes like Bryan Cranston's, Blythe Danner's, and James Caan's. The movie completely wastes the talents of these fine actors and they did not contribute one memorable thing out of this whole movie. The plot lines could have worked but there was never a clear focus on anything going on and you don't end up caring about anything yu see on screen. First the movie tries to establish a relationship going on between Adrian Brody and the young prostitute, then it tries to show this horrible society that goes on around the school, then it shows these random scenes of teachers gathering around for meetings, also it shows Adrian Brody visiting his father in the hospital, and then lastly, it tries to establish this bond between Adrian Brody and the class he teaches while also trying to be really thought provoking and preachy with it's depressing messages, and it was all very mind boggling and messy for me and I can't imagine any normal person being able to soak all that in on one single viewing because I certainly didn't and I most certainly won't be revisiting this film anymore whatsoever in my lifetime, just because of how pretentious and depressing it got as it went on. I really did want to like this movie and for a little bit I was giving it the benefit of a doubt, but an hour in, I just stopped caring about the whole movie and was just waiting for it to end. If the movie would have been just about Adrian Brody and the relationship with his class and cut out all the pretentious preachy crap and the multiple unmemorable plot lines, the movie wouldn't have been so daunting to sit through and it would have been more effective. Considering that this film comes from the director who had brought us the great effective drama American History X, I expected a hell of a lot more. Overall, I really don't want to talk about this movie anymore because I get upset thinking about it and this movie is just a clear example of wasted potential.

Carolyn B (de) wrote: This movie was by far thee worst I've ever seen. The storyline, acting, blantant goofs almost made this more of a comical movie if anything. There are several scenes shot in daylight when the entire thing was taking place at night. At one point you can obviously see one of the crew members for several seconds. I've seen home videos made by kids better than this!

Luke B (mx) wrote: Recently I've watched films about those obsessed with Scrabble, Chess, and Cinema. This was probably my favorite. First of all, all the people featured in this documentary seem to be able to function. They make friends, relationships, study, have jobs, etc. This makes them easier to relate to and makes their talents more impressive. Unlike Scrabble, where people just memorized words, and not their meaning, here the contestants need some intelligence. The documentary loses points as it focuses too much on just The New York Times crossword puzzle. Which is fair enough, and leads to us seeing the creation and editing of crosswords. However, it comes across as an advertisement sometimes. Luckily, there is a lot of interest here. You wouldn't believe how much work goes into a simple puzzle, and how clever they can be. I never knew a puzzle could be witty until I saw the election of Bob Dole/Clinton section. It all boils up to a fantastic tournament finish. What I loved about this was that I was routing for all three finalists, and it was an unpredictable, heart-breaking, but also uplifting ending. It contained a lot of emotions without the manipulation you find in sport biopics.

Miles H (de) wrote: What makes us humans?It's not here.You're looking in the wrong place.

Logan M (au) wrote: "Ghost in the Shell" is less polished, less cinematic, and less expressive than the anime features that come from Studio Ghibli, but it's nothing short of a exciting mash-up of detective thriller and artificial intelligence science fiction.

Lovely Roses From H (us) wrote: this movie isnt scary but its good.

That Reporter Guy (de) wrote: One of the finest comedies ever made.

Fola J (gb) wrote: Great Acting by Granger and Simmons, Chemistry between them is amazing. Star of it though had to be Simmons, her innocence that mixes with her insane motherly madness attraction to the character Stephen Lowry is amazing. Her paradox acting is so appealing.

Claudio D (jp) wrote: Voc v que o filme tenta ser bem produzido, mas no d, a histria bem fraca e a direo pssima...

David W (us) wrote: For some reason I just don't get why This is popular. I thought it was okay.......

Giorgio P (jp) wrote: Some of the most bland cinematography and acting I've ever seen. Its just a bunch of assholes on holiday with the occasional confusingly awful dialogue and comedy

Amanda H (es) wrote: I actually didn't hate this, and I'm pretty surprised since I usually hate this genre. Aubrey Plaza is pretty much always fun, and for once I really enjoyed Rachel Bilson in her role. The multitude of 90s references were good for a laugh and while there really isn't much point, it's not a complete waste of time.

Arash B (ru) wrote: "Exploring the Antarctic is like exploring space. You enter a void, thousands of miles, with no people, no animals, no plants. You're isolated in a vast, empty continent. Claustrophobia and acrophobia in the same place, like two people in a bed."

Tommaso C (fr) wrote: Not a surprise Conan 3 never happened after this halfassed attempt to grab some cash with a sequel that has zero of the epicness of the original.. What a letdown.