Super Cyclone

Super Cyclone

When a super cyclone threatens the entire American eastern seaboard, a lone meteorologist and a petroleum engineer must battle the elements to stop the threat.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:89 minutes
  • Release:2012
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:fire,   chase,   tornado,  

The entire American western seaboard is threaten to clear by a super cyclone. A meteorologist teams up with a petroleum engineer to find the way to prevent it from destroying. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Super Cyclone torrent reviews

Dimitri C (fr) wrote: "Exists" is a found footage horror film full of clichs. But even if its generally never enough original to be fully appreciated, the end is quite satisfying and well writen.

vilvaraja s (gb) wrote: bravo excellent go on sire

Aparna N (es) wrote: expected!

Emre T (gb) wrote: dark comedy, with violence in the foreground.

Bill C (mx) wrote: A young Muslim woman struggles to find a new life in the British Pakistani enclave of coal-belt Keighley, West Yorkshire, northern England. Set against the backdrop of an uncertain community caught up in the tensions of 9/11, Yasmin comes to realize traditional allegiance to family and faith can only continue through the recognition of her responsibility to herself. Any reconciliation of her past must come from within - and somehow accommodate her newly adopted circumstances. Archie Panjabi adds another sensitive performance to her growing resume.

TonyPolito (kr) wrote: DeMille, yes, but not truly epic, since the film's just too saddled down with a love triangle plotline with Barbara Stanwyck as pivot gal. Stanwyck delivers brogue Irish well and she's interesting enough to watch, but the romantic melodrama shares at least equal stage, if not more, with the advertised theme of forging America's first intercontinental railway. And even much of that story feels fairly cliche - Injun attacks, trestle collapses, train robberies and such. There's not much truly historical footing to be found here either. In fact, the Chinese coolie labor is conspicuously absent. Oddly, this film was awarded the 1939 Palme d'Or - retroactively in 2002. The first official Cannes was in 1940, but it apparently wanted to be on record regarding 1939, classic Hollywood's most golden year. They couldn't really award it to any of the titles hindsight now honors - and still be insightful - so, pass the envelope please, it's Union Pacific! RECOMMENDATION: It's no Saturday afternoon oater, it's better-than-average Western fare compared to its period but, again, it's not truly epic in scope. Consider checking out a far-feistier Stanwyck in "The Furies" (1950) instead.

Shoko A (us) wrote: I never thought I love Ozu's film this much! Great plot, casting and camerawork

Gregory W (gb) wrote: wow i really like this silent delores costello is fab.

Don S (kr) wrote: Zac Efron as a high school graduate with a bright future who gives his kid brother a car ride that changes both of their lives. With a hint of Sixth Sense and a love story that grows organically (and somewhat supernaturally). This is a chick flick, but it can be enjoyed by guys as well since baseball and sailing play roles in the movie.

Ricky W (jp) wrote: Marvelous! My kind of movie. Why have I not watched this sooner?

Steve D (kr) wrote: If you liked the original Nim;s Island like I did, stay away from this piece of rubbish with different actors, not nearly as good as the original. Crap movie.

Shawn S (ca) wrote: This has an intriguing story and a great cast. The CGI was dreadful.

Calib M (au) wrote: Waterworld is a decent futuristic action picture with some great sets, some intriguing ideas, and a few images that will stay with me. The script doesn't do a great job with either the spiritual or the physical trek, but the spectacular action sequences occur with enough regularity that strong writing isn't necessary to keep Waterworld afloat.Waterworld really doesnt deserve all the hate it's getting, it's by no means a great movie because of the over exposition script, some ridiculous scenes, and illogical things happening, but aside from that it is very entertaining with some intriguing ideas, awesome set (pieces), and a ver solid post-apocalyptic movie.The movie cost a whopping 200 million, which is a massive amount by today's standard and let alone 1995''s standards. 200 million went down the drain, but not completely, as this film isn't a total disaster. However, it sure doesn't satisfy like 200 million dollar entertainment. Production design is top notch, and combined with some good special FX and sets, the money is definetaly on the screen. However, the story's off, and that's probably why the film didn't gross. After a promising battle in the beginning, albeit a little silly, once they're adrift on the mariner's ship, the film drags. The characters don't have any depth, they just do what they do. The smokers, you don't even know why they do what they do. Outside of finding dryland, there's little focus in the plot, and ultimately the parts don't quite add up to something a 200 million dollar budget should deliver. The only real problem this movie suffers from is that it lacks balance. It tries to be a serious movie about the hardships of life on this aquatic world only to shift gears and become a childish action flick when the bad guys get their screen time. But, there's so much to like here. The movie looks and sounds great with good attention to details and the sets, especially the atoll, are stunning. The story is interesting enough and at times the movie is emotional and funny, so it engages the viewer. I have watched the film a couple of times and I was never bored.Give Waterworld a second chance people, it really isnt that bad...EDIT: Waterworld also spawned probably the coolest live show in the world, at Universal Studio's in L.A, the Waterworld show is incredible!

Christophe C (fr) wrote: very courageous film pro Sandisnistas when the US were for the contras