SuperOutro (1989) torrents full movies

#

SuperOutro

Schizophrenic tramp performs outrageous acts in the streets of Salvador, and in the end tries to fulfill his ultimate dream: to fly over the city, as a superhero would.

SuperOutro is a excited movies torrent of Edgar Navarro. The released year of this movie is 1989. You can check list actors in this movies torrent, for example Bertrand Duarte, Nilda Spencer. The kind of movie are Comedy. Many people rated for this movie, Rate is 6.7 in www.imdb.com. This is really a good movies torrent. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 46 minutes. NickDan is crazy uploader, he is very proactive. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Awesome', so what is your opinion. Do you know what are customers? Maria Ozawa is the best. I don't push my iPad screen. Please support us via sharing this movies to your friends . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

Schizophrenic tramp performs outrageous acts in the streets of Salvador, and in the end tries to fulfill his ultimate dream: to fly over the city, as a superhero would

SuperOutro torrents

SuperOutro full movie

SuperOutro1989 torrent

SuperOutro torrent, SuperOutro movie torrents, download SuperOutro full movie, SuperOutro1989 torrents, download SuperOutro1989 torrents, watch SuperOutro movie, SuperOutro englishsub, free download SuperOutro movie, movie SuperOutro torrent

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   SuperOutro (Edgar Navarro, 1989) DVDRipDVDRip4026730.19 MB

You may also like


Users reviews


Aaron C (fr)

simple yet hilariously moving plot set in rural modern China


Adam A (gb)

There aren't supposed to be any rules in art, and yet Thierry Guetta seems to break all of them in this ambiguous documentary of a clothing salesman turned filmaker turned street artist


Blake P (mx)

Nostalgia for the past can sometimes be sickening, but a film like this makes one yearn for the 1950s, even if they were nothing like this. )I can't say that "Designing Woman" presents anything we haven't seen before, but it's hard to really care about familiarity here. Bacall is so good here that she makes us forget about that tragedy for just a moment. (Keep in mind that her husband, Humphrey Bogart, was at the end of his life during filming. Here, she sizzles, giving a terrific performance that seems miles away from her legendary parts in "To Have and Have Not" or "The Big Sleep". As an actress typecast into the roles of low-voiced, seductive females for much of her career, "Designing Woman" sees her in an entirely different light. They look great together, but special notice should be put toward Bacall's stupendous work. Better are the performances, with a suitably straight-manned Peck and a comedically superb Bacall. This is a movie of exquisite taste, requiring no effort to draw us in. Paired with Minnelli's attractive directional skills, loaded with style, the film is fun but not so fun that brains are left in the sun to fry. George Wells' screenplay keeps things going at a fashionable, quick-witted pace, throwing in clever voiceovers, fourth-wall breakings, and winningly comedic scenarios that work more often than not. For such a tired plot, "Designing Woman" is sure energetic: comedy is one thing, but portraying it well, along with a starry romance, is another. Mandatory misunderstandings follow; but love conquers all. That same starlet, coincidentally, is playing the lead in a musical that Marilla is designing costumes for. Things get even worse when Marilla discovers a risqu photo of a Broadway star (Dolores Gray) in Mike's old apartment. The night is disastrous, all chaos and no fun, leaving the newlyweds disconcerted by the fact that their social circles hardly match. Things don't end up turning out well. The apartment is crowded, loud, and clashing. Mike invites his poker mates for a few rounds; Marilla summons her theater friends to chat about an upcoming play. But all comes to a head one weekday evening. Conversations run easy, affection even easier. The first few months consist only of simple bliss, with few incidents of disagreement or annoyance. They have nothing common -- he's a man's man, she a glamourpuss -- but they forge a natural bond that eventually leads to a hasty (but loving) union. Gregory Peck portrays Mike Hagen, a sports reporter who meets and instantly falls in love with Marilla Brown (Lauren Bacall), a fashion designer, during a sunny vacation. It's the best kind of entertainment: fluffy, agreeable, smart, visually stunning, and fast, with two mega stars leading and clearly having a lot of fun with their material. I don't just watch these films: I want to live in them, explore the possibilities of non-problems, witty lines, and romantic misunderstandings. It's all artificial and it's about as deep as a 1960s era Palm Springs postcard; but despite my appreciation for films that take a trip down realism lane, "Designing Woman", along with its colorful, vintage, romantic comedy counterparts, hold a special place in my heart. New York is a cocktail of newspaper headquarters, fashion shows, Broadway musicals, blondes, bottles, high-end restaurants where you may or may not see an Oscar winner. To look and act elegantly is a first priority. They exist in this ultrafizzy, Edward Hopper akin, CinemaScope universe in which the rich thrive and champagne flows freely. If only I could wrap myself in movies like "Designing Woman"


Bryan M (br)

Duerr's understanding of and compassion for the Toynbee Tiler ultimately make the ending fulfilling and even incredible when you consider how appropriate it is that the two lives intersect. Seemingly off-topic biographical parts of the doc reveal that Duerr may have a surprising amount in common with the person he has been searching for and although the ending may be unsatisfying for some, it works for me. Given very little clues to go on, Justin Duerr leads a small group of amateur detectives who try to figure out who created the Toynbee Tiles & left them all over the world. Fascinating tale of a bizarre mystery and the obsession of those trying to solve it


david a (ag)

I never seen the movie but I read the book and the was so cool


Joe (ca)

More people should see this movie!


Mark L (kr)

An interesting idea for a documentary (the history of modern Yugoslavia) its too cartoony in its presentation, and far too complimentary to the pre-breakup state


Martin R (de)

It's a kid's film, can't be too harsh on a kid's film even though it is so underwhelming compared to Spielberg's previous stuff (and many of his later works). "Hook" is O-kay if you're not expecting much. And no, I'm not joking. " "Hey, you ain' never had a friend like me!!!!"In short: I only did this review so I wouldn't have to do my essay. But I will say this, since I watched it for the first time last year, "Good Will Hunting," that is Robin Williams' arguably most impressive performance, well, if I don't count "Aladdin" because, oh damn it, I already said "Aladdin. Doubfire," "Jumanji," and maybe even "Flubber" more. Robin Williams' passing might sway a few people's opinions about "Hook" to the favorable side, for me, not so much (although, I think I'm on the favorable side just for 'technical' reasons), I think I preferred him in stuff like "Mrs. That's a pretty sad, honestly, because "Hook" isn't even all that. There's bound to be another Peter Pan adaptation through some medium in a few years and I'm wondering how many of those are going to fail to top "Hook" film quality-wise. Anyways, since "Hook," we've gotten "Peter Pan," "Finding Neverland," the critically panned and financial bomb "Pan," and "Peter and Wendy" (it's a TV show, I've never seen it). I know I watched Disney's animated one on VHS once. Wait, I'm not even sure if that's true. This is the first Peter Pan adaptation I've ever seen. Magic, it's just a shame that "Hook" doesn't have too many of those feels. The 'Food Fight' scene, still, amazes me with how magical those few seconds feel when Peter looks at his spoon. Again, the score is the saving grace of the film. It could almost pass for a horror film with those harrowing strings, talk about creating suspense, and it's one of those things that really make me think, 'man, what if Spielberg had done THAT for more scenes?' Another moment I think was great was when the Lost Boys meet Peter Pan (who, in that moment, doesn't know he's Peter Pan) and that one kid feels his face [I know that sounds weird out of context, shut up] and says, 'oh, there you are, Peter,' and that emotional choral track is heard. I really like the scene where (it's after Hook has stolen Pan's kids) and Peter and the others are entering their house, they see the mark that Hook has left along the walls, and it is just so well done. "The Ultimate War" (as in the track) is one of the most impressive action cues I've ever heard. Peter Pan soaring through the sky wouldn't have the impact that it did without that score, I can tell you that. It is a textbook example of a not-so-good film having quality film music, and in many scenes, it's John Williams who provides, if not elevates, the muscle (and the emotion) for the picture. The high point of "Hook" for me [and it's something that is HIGHLY respected] is John Williams' score. More action-y? I don't know, I just think it's missing something]. intense, sort of. . . Pirates battle was fun but it could have been more. If anything, the CGI might have helped the sword fighting, which truly is lackluster here [just to be clear, the Lost Boys v. Personally, I like the overall look (all the sets they constructed and stuff) but even if he had used all CGI [with Spielberg behind the camera, who cares? It's still going to be shot in a way that's vastly superior than, say, "Pan"], the script would have been a major flaw. Even though Spielberg has since said that he didn't like "Hook" and were he to do it again that he wouldn't use live sets (all CGI, he said) or so I read. 5 out of 5 stars anyways. I'm giving the film 3. Enjoy the hug because you sure will never be able to do that again. You literally just lost them. You didn't save your family. Take the film's ending, what do we learn about Peter after all this Neverland stuff? He throws his cell phone out the window and hugs his kids, hey buddy, you probably just got fired for ditching that call and now you're going to be broke and on the streets. It would have been interesting not only IF Peter was a neglectful father but IF, also, his kids were spoiled as hell [that way, when James Hook decides to replace Peter as their father, they can undergo a bit character development]. ' The ideas are there, but I think what held a lot back was Spielberg's tendencies to keep things family-oriented and reluctance to do anything dark [which I can understand since "The Temple of Doom" was criticized for that]. There's no 'meaty' conflict in "Hook" that makes you want to cheer for Pan, it kind of has the effect of 'hurry up and get this over with. The stakes are never high. Movie's over. They just get taken and, umm, yeah, then Peter takes them back. his kids aren't in any real danger. . . It's hard to become emotionally invested in a film about Peter Pan having grown up and then having to rescue his kids when. And to keep things simple, the script is truly the film's most detrimental aspect of the production. None of the characters really do anything to make you care about the film. Same with Dustin Hoffman as Captain James Hook, who you can tell really had fun shooting some of his scenes, although, his character is too silly to be taken seriously. And then the movie came out and the reaction was really mixed with some calling it Spielberg's worst film, but the question is, is it really his worst? Robin Williams stars as Peter Pan and while he does bring some energy to the role, he's not really given a whole lot to do as far as fleshing out his character goes. T and "Indiana Jones;" Spielberg on fantasy mode was going to out of this world. In 1991, it was known that Steven Spielberg was going to direct a Peter Pan adaptation and, at a time when Spielberg was the hottest MC-I mean, director-in the game, audiences must have been asking: what could possibly go wrong? It's Steven flippin' Spielberg! This was the guy who gave us "E


Robert H (es)

A worthwhile addition to the Trancers series and a must watch for Jack Deth fans. While the quest he goes on isn't original, it's still a fun watch. This film is essentially a quest film as Jack is trying to find a way back home. Following in the medievil footsteps of part 4, this film concentrates more on Jack Deth and less on the trancers which is nice. Once you get past the backstory filler at the beginning of this film, Trancers 5 turns out to be a decent film


Sarah N (it)

always fast-fwd through the scenes they aren't in! Their dance numbers are amazing!. this would have been a much better movie. . . If only Fred and Ginger could have been the focus of the movie instead of sharing the plot with Scott and Dunne