Swallows and Amazons
On holiday with their mother in the Lake District in 1929 four children are allowed to sail over to the nearby island in their boat Swallow and set up camp for a few days. They soon realise this has been the territory of two other girls who sail the Amazon, and the scene is set for serious rivalry.
The film is based on famous novel. It is about the interesting adventure of four children and their sailing boat Swallow in the Norfolk Broads. They uncover another boat the Amazon belongs to rivals for dominion of the island which makes them have surprise experiences. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Swallows and Amazons torrent reviews
(ag) wrote: Not sure why foreign films always get so high critical ratings. Somewhat engaging.
(au) wrote: Good sports flick. Enjoyed the cheesiness that the Browns made a right decision. Lol.
(fr) wrote: With all the trash material available at the Italian television it could have made a little bit better but the message is clear: the values the tv is based is bad, the values people watching trash tv are wrong and the president is using these bad values to affirm his popularity and get more consensus amongst people. I will have to see Citizen Kane now.
(ag) wrote: During the penitential season of Lent 2012, I decided to fast from watching movies. Mostly. I tended to fudge on it by reading allot about films and planning on what I would watch once Lent was over. Feeling the urge to head outside of the house and see one of the many flicks I had been reading about, I tried to convince my wife to accompany me to see either the critically acclaimed Studio Ghibli,film ~The Secret World of Ariety(TM) or the critically panned film ~The Lorax(TM), which I still think looks good, despite the negative reviews. If I did happen to watch a film, I promised myself that I would then write a review about it. My overall goal for Lent is to give up being passive, laxidasical and slothful. This means applying myself and using my creative writing talents to create a useful reason for actually watching a film and not letting it be just to amuse myself. I will share that amusement or lack thereof with others by writing A review that was not fluff and had some substance to it. I do hope that this review is informative and entertaining. When my wife learned I was writing a review instead of a journal entry she concluded it would be boring and didn(TM)t want me to read it to her. How(TM)s that for someone who is supposed to root for the home team.Not wanting to go to the cinema for financial reasons, I picked a film I thought would be a perfect Lenten film. ~The Mill and the Cross(TM). If I(TM)m going to watch films during the time I should be sacrificing, I should watch religious ones. TMatC It is philosophical artsy film about artist Pieter Bruegel the Elder's 1564 painting ~The Procession to Calvary(TM). It is also based on a book by Michael Francis Gibson called ~The Mill and the Crossa(TM). The film explores the world in which the painter paints his painting. It explores the many lives that one sees on the canvas. There is a structure and logic to the painting and there is a structure and logic to the film. It goes inside the painting thus going inside the mind of Bruegel. It is the type of film that you would have to watch more than once in order to get the depth of what is going on story wise. Although despite its creativity and beautiful cinematography, you might not want to come back for a second viewing. My wife described it as ~calm and confusing(TM). You somewhat get to know the characters but never their names or some of the motivations behind their actions. For her it lacked a center that drew the story together. She also found the dead man strung up on a pole with crows pecking at his eyes to be morbid. The best moment in the film is when either Bruegel or some other character is explaining the meaning behind the symbolism of the painting or some aspect of the world around the painting. The Mill and the Cross is overall a creative endeavor with some profound food for thought if you(TM)re in the right state of mind and can appreciate philosophical artsy reflective non-conventional cinema. It is worth watching at least once and perhaps more than once for the reasons I just mentioned. Although I(TM)m sticking with the just once.Some nudity of a mother undressing in the presence of her child and some other scenes of sensuality plus somewhat graphic portrayal of violence make this a strictly cinematic affair for adults only. I now continue my journey to the cross of Christ on Good Friday and await the resurrection with him on Easter morning.
(fr) wrote: Best movie i have ever seen. Wish i could watch it every day. Grate message. Recommend it for everyone
(au) wrote: Well it didnt have my sympathy. It has laughably bad, over acting and it bored me right away so I turned it of after 10 minutes. Its DOA! Avoid!!!
(kr) wrote: bring me an arab..bring me an arab jew..not funny at all ok..another movie of the 2000s that touch the political issues and most especially the stupid of arabs and terrorism..and horrible how afhgan actually change wen they live in the united states..oooh mandy moore is not she can act except that she was overacting!haha zat guy from election is soo funny his tatoo got ruined with a bullet shot..and the lady from legally blonde is soooo cute as always..very suprising and cute end that makes it a non-bad movie..
(de) wrote: This film lacked a lot. It lacked thrills, awesome death scenes, and excitement.
(br) wrote: I've watched this film several times before. Why would I do that you may ask? Well even though it has one of the most overused storylines ever, crappy acting, the worst special effects ever and no consistency, it is a very entertaining movie to watch. Yes, it is good because it is so bad. I highly recommend you to watch this if you love watching low budget films just to have a laugh.
(gb) wrote: What made the first Academy film so enjoyable was its silliness and humour but in this third chapter even though it tries to be funny it just does not get anywhere near being funny
(fr) wrote: I'm guessing what this movie mainly lacks is suspense, even with three people and one robot on a spaceship. Although, I have to admit that Kirk Douglas gives a decent performance from start to finish.
(ag) wrote: good action/adventure yarn
(ca) wrote: Excellent, so bad it is incredible.