#

Tabe Tai Hok

A web of secrets, deceits, games and lies ... and three human beings caught up in a dangerous tangle of love, lust and passion.

and three human beings caught up in a dangerous tangle of love, lust and passion. . . A web of secrets, deceits, games and lies

Tabe Tai Hok is a new movie of Md. Javed Alam (translation), Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay (translation), Sougata Roy Burman (poem), Sougata Roy Burman (story), Dyuti Mukherjee (translatio. This movie was introduced in 2012. There are many actors in this movie torrents, such as Swastika Mukherjee, Joy Sengupta, Samadarshi Dutta, Debesh Roy Chowdhury, Ranajoy Bhattacharya, Shrabani Ghosh, Titir Sengupta, Manotosh Debnath, Sk. Ahmeduddin, Sk. Shahnawaz. There are many categories, such as Drama. The rating is 4.9 in www.imdb.com. This is really a good movies torrent. Enjoy this movies torrent and share to your friends

Tabe Tai Hok torrents

Tabe Tai Hok full movie

Tabe Tai Hok 2012 torrent

Tabe Tai Hok torrent, Tabe Tai Hok movie torrents, download Tabe Tai Hok full movie, Tabe Tai Hok 2012 torrents, download Tabe Tai Hok 2012 torrents, watch Tabe Tai Hok movie, Tabe Tai Hok englishsub, free download Tabe Tai Hok movie, movie Tabe Tai Hok torrent

Links Name Quality Seeders Leechers Size
Download   Tabe Tai Hok (2012) 720p DVDrip ~SaNRiM~ DVDRip 50 39 2.21 GB

Users reviews


Allen H (es)

100. 40/100 Total score 60. This film needs a lot more work to be taken seriously, which this film is not supposed to be. 80/100 Artistic merit: Nothing truly groundbreaking here; the jokes are old, but funny. 70/100 Did I enjoy it: Yes, very funny and silly. A lot of the supporting cast does an excellent job being funny and keeping the film together. I liked Sid Caesar as the cave man the most. 40/100 Character/Acting: Lots of corny Vaudevillian and naughty jokes that are silly and funny. Great ideas but disjointed. 60/100 Narrative: An episodic history parody that does not flow well together. 75/100 Technical: Nothing great here, cheap sets and props; it is supposed to be a comedy not an epic though. Sound: Nothing really great here beyond the standard production values for a film of this type


Anthony L (nl)

The dialogue is incredibly difficult to get through and the inane story puzzles as to why the movie has been kept on this long. Save yourself from this one. Don't go by the description, or the picture, or anything really. Skye can't save this plotless drivel. Those are the only two words that make this film worth watching, but even Ms. Azura Skye


Cassie M (au)

I was bored with it after about 30 minutes


Chris F (br)

This could have been a decent coming of age film but instead is just a shell of one. The acting was wooden and the direction a bore. This film felt like a high school play rehearsal


Fiona H (gb)

ust weird!. . . The same is true of Joely, really English but American in hit show Nip/Tuck. I know its natural accent but after becoming a huge fan of 'House' it's very strange seeing and hearing Hugh like this


Gordon I (ca)

This films offers very little outside the controversial scenes depicting unsimulated sex acts (and there are many)


Harts C (mx)

And it isn't "about soccer. Watch this movie, it's a wonderful watch. If you haven't, take a broader perspective. It's really difficult to understand this movie if you haven't come out of the closet before. The picture and music ensemble are simple, but go with the pitch of the two elementary school students. This movie is one of the most beautiful Chinese movie I have ever seen


Jackie E (au)

I must admit I haven't seen the whole movie, as I turned it off 15mins into it - so dont take my word for it. This is not a good film, you feel like you're watching Disney's animated version of Cinderella, except that Prince Charming is a male chauvinist who runs around half naked with the hugest muscles ever drawn on an animated character. Lady Death is like Disney trying to be evil & sexy


Jonathan T (jp)

. . Should of killed off Serrone in the first 5 mins, prob would of won an Grammy. The story will have you until the end. Lots of close up shots and lighting issues but I am not a film maker. With the exception of Chris Serrone, The movie is gripping. The movie is very well done


Josh G (ca)

For those of you who are wondering where to see this short, it is available in its entirely on YouTube. S. P. It's a tad confusing, but ultimately a very interesting viewing experience. According to wikipedia, which is where I've gotten all of the information I've used in this review, Keaton died just 18 months after Film was released. Why doesn't he blind the "eyes" of the rocking chair? Should we look at the bookend close-ups of an eye at the beginning and close of the movie as one set: are these eyes watching everything that happens in between? Are they the eyes of God? Does O need to be watched (a la Berkeley's "to be is to be perceived") and is therefore projecting a God/watcher? < /SPOILERS > In short (pun totally intended!!!!), it's a very thought-provoking and interesting movie, made even more meaningful by the mortality of its star. well, the ending doesn't work as well with this interpretation. . . It's also worthwhile to look at O as the product of an unhealthy and undiagnosed paranoia, checking his pulse compulsively and refusing to walk in front of mirrors for fear of being seen by. " This explains why, although O prevents everything around him from being able to see him -- including both God and the curtains -- he still finds himself face to face with himself at the end. Keaton himself said that the theme of Film is the idea that "a man may keep away from everybody but he can't get away from himself. < SPOILERS > There is plenty of room for interpretation as to the meaning of this seventeen minute short, which is part of its charm. On the other hand, there are a few scenes that don't make a lot of sense to me -- an old woman carrying flowers on a staircase, for example -- and although I appreciate that the humor in Film was very indicative of Buster Keaton's style, it kind of felt out of place with the philosophical(?) musings of the later scenes. I don't think that this was completely intentional, given that Keaton was not the first choice for the role, but it certainly does add an extra layer of mystique to the whole proceeding. Considering that Keaton was nicknamed "The Great Stone Face", it is important to note that his face is not shown on camera until the very end of the short. At his apartment -- furnished only with a bed, a few small animals, a rocking chair, and a picture of God -- O sets about deconstructing his apartment (and his life?) in a way that is at once rife with symbolism and the humor of the Buster Keaton that we know and love. The man (named 'O' in the script) rushes to his house, trying to avoid the all-seeing eye that is following him, scaring the people he passes along the way. Of course, the audience is aware that the man is Buster Keaton. The eye becomes the camera, looking casually about its surroundings until it focuses on a man rushing down the street, huddling as close to the wall as possible and hiding his face. Gradually, it becomes clear that it is in fact an extreme close-up of a person's eye. It opens with a shot which, upon first glance, looked to me like an endless ocean seen from above. On one hand, this short is beautifully well made. " I'm kind of falling in between the film and theater scholars on this one. Critical opinion is mixed, but it is generally held in higher regard by film scholars than it is by theatre or Beckett scholars. From wikipedia's entry on Film: "The work is studied by and has been the subject of criticism from both film and theatre scholars, with the former tending to study the film as shot, the latter tending to study the script as written