Taistelu Näsilinnasta 1918

Taistelu Näsilinnasta 1918

N/A

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:70 minutes
  • Release:2012
  • Language:Finnish,Swedish
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:cannon,   battle,   fight,  

. You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Taistelu Näsilinnasta 1918 torrent reviews

Tommy K (kr) wrote: A little boring but it brought back memories.

Babak I (kr) wrote: I think I rented this movie once but found it to be too low budget to watch... I can't remember. In any case im not interested this time round either...

Darion B (es) wrote: So many twists and turns. The ending is great

Navin J (jp) wrote: I am suprised that I haven't heard of this movie. It's not the greatest, but it's sort of like the Family Stone - where people gather for some sort of reason and secrets are revealed and revelations are something or the other.There are some weird characters, and the story isn't all that believeable but it was entertaining.

Allan C (kr) wrote: Overlong, but entertaining enough of throwback style sci-fi that involves Ray Liotta as a medical examiner trying to solve his wife's murder by using scientist Linda Fiorentino's experimental drug that allows a person to experience the memories of another person first hand. The film and story have the charm of feeling like a Roger Corman style of 50s/60s sci-fi along the lines of "X: The Man with X-Ray Eyes" or "The 4D Man." There's a good supporting cast that includes Peter Coyote, Christopher McDonald, David Paymer, Kim Cattrall, Kim Coates and a good score by the under appreciated Christopher Young. The film was directed by John Dahl who had previously made three great noir style throwback films ("Kill Me Again," "Red Rock West" and "The Last Seduction") was trying something new here, but Dahl didn't write this one and the script is not nearly as tight as his three previous films. With the exception of this film, I think Dahl has a solid track record with "Rounders," "Joyride" and "The Great Raid." It's really disappointing to see him pretty much exclusively doing TV for hire jobs now instead of feature films.

David E (nl) wrote: agitate, against all these invisible fraudulant societal constructions."Girls can wear jeans and cut their hair short, wear shirts and boots, 'cause it's okay to be a boy, but for a boy to look like a girl is degrading, because you think that being a girl is degrading. But secretly you'd love to know what it's like, wouldn't you? What it feels like for a girl?"

Grant S (ru) wrote: Rachel Phelps is the new owner of the Cleveland Indians baseball team. However, her plans for the team are rather nefarious. She wants to move the team to Miami for the warmer climate and a new stadium. To justify the move, the team has to lose, and lose badly. So she assembles the worst possible team she can. Among these are a past-his-prime catcher with bad knees, a shrewd but past-his-prime pitcher, a young tearaway pitcher (and felon) with a 100 mph fastball but absolutely no control, a third baseman who is too wealthy and precious to dive, a voodoo-loving slugger who can't hit a curveball and an energetic-but-naive lead off hitter and base-stealer who can't keep the ball on the ground. Against the odds, and after the inevitable initial failures, they iron out some of their faults and start to win, much to Ms Phelps' consternation. Great baseball movie. Plot is your standard sport fairy tale - a non-hoper team's rise against adversity. While the result is a bit predictable, the journey is very entertaining. Very funny, with some wonderfully diverse and idiosyncratic characters.Very engaging too. Even though you suspect you know how things are going to pan out, nothing is certain and you get swept along with the movies boundless energy.One of the best sports comedies, if not sports movies, you'll see.

Kelli H (ag) wrote: Not sure why the year says 2001 because this movie is 1958..

Vincent W (ru) wrote: Alex Pettyfer sucks at acting. The lead chick (Vanessa Hudgens) was also totally boring. The only thing this film had going for it was Neil Patrick Harris. I literally watched the whole film in like 15 minutes, just stopping to snoop at the parts with Neil in it.Total muck. Avoid this.

william w (kr) wrote: Not enough action for my test - a little too camp / Americanised / chilled out.

shawn W (ag) wrote: This is suppose to be a classic movie but it's not funny and it's boring as hell