Tangled

Tangled

When the kingdom's most wanted-and most charming-bandit Flynn Rider hides out in a mysterious tower, he's taken hostage by Rapunzel, a beautiful and feisty tower-bound teen with 70 feet of magical, golden hair. Flynn's curious captor, who's looking for her ticket out of the tower where she's been locked away for years, strikes a deal with the handsome thief and the unlikely duo sets off on an action-packed escapade, complete with a super-cop horse, an over-protective chameleon and a gruff gang of pub thugs.

After receiving the healing powers from a magical flower, the baby Princess Rapunzel is kidnapped from the palace in the middle of the night by Mother Gothel. Mother Gothel knows that the flower's magical powers are now growing within the golden hair of Rapunzel, and to stay young, she must lock Rapunzel in her hidden tower. Rapunzel is now a teenager and her hair has grown to a length of 70-feet. The beautiful Rapunzel has been in the tower her entire life, and she is curious of the outside world. One day, the bandit Flynn Ryder scales the tower and is taken captive by Rapunzel. Rapunzel strikes a deal with the charming thief to act as her guide to travel to the place where the floating lights come from that she has seen every year on her birthday. Rapunzel is about to have the most exciting and magnificent journey of her life. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Tangled1080p342701.44 GB
Download   Tangled720p17059499.72 MB
Download   Tangled3d42431.5 GB

Tangled torrent reviews

Justin A (au) wrote: John Landis' most recent directorial effort since Blues Brothers 2000 may be his best movie since Coming to America... but that's not saying much. The jokes don't necessarily hit and I didn't find myself really laughing, but hats off to Simon Pegg and Andy Serkis who are both entertaining regardless of the drab material. It's really just an average comedy, but even that is high praise for Landis these days.

Nate S (nl) wrote: The most beautiful and brutal movie I think I have ever seen. The story and characters are amazing with how little they really do. A must see!

Blake P (fr) wrote: A David Lynch film is a tightrope act of sorts. They're all a little abstract, a little bit mystical, but remaining (usually) is a looming mystery that is never solved; the viewer must be ready to interpret the abstruse puzzle presented to them. In a great Lynch film, "Mulholland Dr." for example, a profound characterization can act as a backbone to the many head spinning detours that dawdle in the celluloid. Without one, though, a Lynch film can become intolerable, masturbatory rather than dazzling, a series of puzzle pieces that don't fit anywhere besides his own mind. He is perhaps the definitive hit-or-miss filmmaker - when he hits, his baffling ideas are seductive, lingering in our memory like our very first run-in with Rita Hayworth's Gilda; but when he misses, we're presented with a nightmarish landscape that doesn't make a whole lot of sense, doesn't go anywhere, and doesn't have much in the way of meaning. (And a Lynch film is generally long, making insufferability even more insufferable as the images go on and on and on and on ...) Simply put, "Inland Empire" is one of David Lynch's most unbearable movies. It's his first film shot completely digitally, done so with a Sony DCR-VX1000 camcorder; the images, in return, are fuzzy and textural. Some, especially Lynch, find this photographic technique to hold more value in terms of enigma and subversion, but I, possibly in the minority, think that this experiment is a downfall. His images are so outrightly peculiar (only he could sell the idea of three people in rabbit suits living in an apartment together in sitcom bliss) that the cheapness of the digital camera makes his once lush pictorial instincts read like an experimental student short. Before, the lavishness of film made diversions into the freakish more of a surprise; here, Lynchian punches no longer hold the shock the once did. This shouldn't suggest that his cinematic mastery is waning - it's the fault of the camera, not his. Supposedly, "Inland Empire" is about Nikki Grace (Laura Dern), a has-been actress who has just received a part in a movie that could revitalize her once strong career. Her co-star is known womanizer Devon Berk (Justin Theroux), her director the respected Kingsley Stewart (Jeremy Irons). Minutes into the rehearsal process is it revealed that the project is thought to be cursed - it was supposed to be made decades ago, but the actors tragically died during the filmmaking process. Following this revelation, strange things start to occur: Nikki and Devon begin to mimic the lives of the characters they're playing, Sue Blue and Billy Side, and Nikki, desperate as she is to succeed, begins experiencing situations that can only be described as hallucinatory. I say "supposedly" when providing the plot summary because "Inland Empire" revolves around this storyline for only the first act, possibly even less. It starts off intriguingly, with the same sort of luminous ambiguities of "Lost Highway", until it descends into a labyrinth of entangled phantasms. For a while, the delusions are evocative (the audacious pairings with experimental music are especially fascinating), but at three hours, "Inland Empire" eventually keels over and turns into an unappetizing smorgasbord of Lynchian rejects. As the story was never interesting enough to begin with, interpretation is left untouched; we're either frustrated or stimulated, mostly the former. The one thing to celebrate in "Inland Empire" is Laura Dern, in a fearless performance. Her character(s) is hardly defined, but Dern gives us a reason to gaze upon her face with utter enthrallment. She wanders around the maze Lynch places her in the middle of; Dern is so breathtaking that, once in a while, she deceives us into thinking that the material is solid rather than flimsy. More or less, "Inland Empire" is flimsy. Lynch wrote the script as filming went on (seriously), and nothing ever commences from it. He is a great director, but nothing is worse than taking an audience for granted, especially when that audience has to meander through a film for 180 minutes.

Charles D (mx) wrote: I really enjoyed watching this movie. I'm a big fan of David Belle. He has really encouraged me to become a better traceur.

Ryan B (es) wrote: This may be on the top of my list just cause i'm in love with Yu Aoi........ But I don't know. I love the movie, that's one thing I do know.

Alfredo S (mx) wrote: The time-traveling element may be the most confusing of all the movies that revolves around it, still it has the Disney charisma and colorful animation to make it worth watching

Fivos G (it) wrote: ?????????? ?????????? ???? ??????? ?????, ???? ?? ?????. ??????? ?? ??????? ??????. ?? ???? ??? ???????????? ??? ????? ?????? ??????????? ??? ??? ??? ??????.

Ro D (kr) wrote: i really love the story is fantastic, beautiful and not conventional

Donna F (au) wrote: Paul Newman stands out in this so-so drama.

Ar M (us) wrote: Al fin vi esta pelicula de 1969 de Vaqueros, Gitanos... y Dinosaurios!

Jon S (ag) wrote: Quite possibly the first action/fantasy live-action movie I have ever seen in my life, Jack the Giant Killer is a solid story of a brave young lad who rises up to rescue a princess. Accompanied by a young deckhand, a Viking sailor, and a wish-granting Leprechaun, Jack does battle against an evil sorcerer and his army of giants. Being one of the first movies I have ever seen, this film has almost completely shaped my taste in movies, and my love of tales of the swashbuckling adventurer battling against the forces of evil.

Jon E (ru) wrote: Okay..if a little tedious in places with a non delivery at the end :-(