Eda was a dance student attending an academy. When she was a student, she got pregnant from her lover Cihan who is already married and has a child. When she realized this, she learned that ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Eda was a dance student attending an academy. When she was a student, she got pregnant from her lover Cihan who is already married and has a child. When she realized this, she learned that ...
You may also like
The Abortion torrent reviews
Loren R (gb) wrote: Die alte Rentnertruppe, von alten CIA Agenten, sind wieder auf Trab!Dieses Mal mssen sie eine Nuklearwaffe finden und ihren durchgeknallten Erfinder. Dabei kommen noch andere Hrden auf sie zu. Und der Erfinder der Waffe, ist auch alles anderes, als sie erwarten htten.Schon wenn man diese Grundgeschichte hrt, weiss man, dass es nicht grosse berraschungen gibt. Denn solche Geschichten von Agenten und Wissenschaftlern gab es schon genug. Wichtig ist hier eigentlich nur die Besetzung: Bruce Willis, John Malkovich, Helen Mirren, Brian Cox und Mary-Louise Parker sind vom ersten Teil zurck. Untersttzt werden sie von Catherine Zeta-Jones, Anthony Hopkins und Byung-hun Lee. Bei dieser knallbunten Besetzung macht es schon Spass, den Film anzusehen.Sicherlich ist die Action an erster Stelle und es wurde auch gut inszeniert. Aber die Dialoge und der Humor sind nicht mehr gerade das, was man vor ersten Teil kannte. Gewisse Szenen sind zu trocken und kommen manchmal auch Lustlos rber. Am besten hat mir Anthony Hopkins gefallen. Der hatte wirklich Bock, seine Rolle zu spielen und ich musste paarmal Schmunzeln, bei seinem Spiel.Sonst ist die Story wirklich nichts Besonderes. Und gewisse Schauspieler sind wirklich hlzern. Denn wenn die schon keine Lust dazu hatten, dann sollen sie sich wirklich berlegen, einen dritten Teil zu machen.Fazit: Eine nicht so gelungene Fortsetzung. Die Schauspieler spielen hlzern oder sind sogar deplatziert. Die Action ist gut. Man knnte aber noch an den Dialogen ein bisschen feilen!
Aashik S (us) wrote: To begin with the story may be clich - "innocuous people getting themselves in trouble amidst the world of gangsters who in the race for some big moolah"- but the treatment is truly unique.The direction matches up to Sudhir Mishra's benchmarks. The music is good and carries the movie forward. Cinematography is first rated - Old Delhi couldn't have been more picturesque. .A special mention here for the dialogues which are both witty and funny - Delhi based films can't do without the beeps, can they?As far as acting goes, Irfan Khan leads the pack with an unparalleled performance. Saurabh Shukhla is at his usual best. Aditi Rao is sensuous and has some serious potential. Chitrangda Singh in charming. Arunoday Singh, who went unnoticed in his earlier two films pulls this off brilliantly.Final Verdict - Don't miss this one.
Gerald C (ru) wrote: lovely film... both Gwei Lunmei & Zaizai Lin shine...I like the light, warm and tranquil mood throughout... the sisters look, talk and think different (partly thanks to great casting) and yet their lives converge and they become more the same (sisters after all)... the scenes with the mother (funnily repeated with variations) and interviews of ordinary Taipei citizens on small yet subtle questions about life's many choices light up the film so much... making the story feel so close to the core of our lives... the longing for the titular 36th story, which is yet to be lived and told by the sister after hearing 35 from others, is touching (sth I share personally) ... This is another light, slow-paced comedy based on Taipei-ers after Au Revoir Taipei telling of their yearning to venture outside the island and see the world...
Gabriel K (nl) wrote: The noir tone of this movie is picture-perfect. The director uses his typical stripped down narrative, and I'm not sure it works in this movie as well as it did in Distant. Having said that, the characters are masterfully crafted and acting is impeccable.
Jean A (gb) wrote: Pretty good! I thought this is a very lovely story! Makes you want to fall in love, specially if you're in your 30s! :-)
Mark W (de) wrote: Charlie the son of Santa Claus has now turned into a bit of a rebel it seems... Despite knowing of Santas existence he seems to have a complete disregard for the concept of the naughty list.... That aside Mr Claus needs to find a "Mrs Claus"-e and an evil replica Santa takes control of the workshop... My goodness does Disney fun run rampant! Overall it's a little bit more ridiculous than the predecessor, but there's still some fun to be had!
Caitlin L (de) wrote: A sweet story of a daughter finding her father and herself.
Corinna P (au) wrote: thehe, it has it's moments!!
Martin S (mx) wrote: Intense! Doesn't really make you like the English.
Sebastian D (ca) wrote: Attack, defence and so what? The relation between two main characters which plot was supposed to revolve around turned out to be plain. Maybe the original picture from 70s is worth watching.
Dylan P (au) wrote: Just perfection. One of the most realistic films of all time, with a cast that oozes perfection and a treatment of minority groups that is generally quite rare, even in 2016. Al Pacino's best performance, undeniably layered and beautifully put to screen, it feels very natural throughout (same goes for all actors in this film, especially Cazale and Sarandon).
Robert T (us) wrote: A great movie, I loved it ! Saw it in '73 bought and have enjoyed seeing eveyo
Bryan W (jp) wrote: i just watched this in its entirety for the first time, and it's just as good as i thought after my initial, partial-viewing from about a year ago. the initial 5-10 minutes are quite laughable, as it takes all of 45 seconds for elvis to break into song...but after the initial frivolity, it's good stuff. the acting is a little bit over the top, but it's well done. the violence is pretty violent, and elvis has some quality action sequences. good stuff all around, and while the ending is kind of abrupt, it's palatable. this is quite a good western, and not just another elvis novelty movie.
Erik J (ag) wrote: A standard, but no less solid Hitchcock "everyman wrongfully accused" setup that unfortunately is bogged down with over the top speechifying about "goodness, noble people and The American Spirit" and coupled with a less than satisfying conclusion that makes for a decent but less than substantial suspense thriller.
Frances H (fr) wrote: An intelligent thriller done with style, and Viola Davis is always a plus point.
Katey W (it) wrote: If you wanna see it bc Megan Fox is sexy then it's the movie for you.
Joey S (ca) wrote: I cannot take back watching this . If you rated this good you never actually watched this