The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant

The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant

Petra von Kant is a successful fashion designer -- arrogant, caustic, and self-satisfied. She mistreats Marlene (her secretary, maid, and co-designer). Enter Karin, a 23-year-old beauty who wants to be a model. Petra falls in love with Karin and invites her to move in.

Petra von Kant is a successful fashion designer -- arrogant, caustic, and self-satisfied. She mistreats Marlene (her secretary, maid, and co-designer). Enter Karin, a 23-year-old beauty who... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant torrent reviews

Hashaka E (kr) wrote: The phrase "keep you at the edge of your seat" was coined because of such movies. Thrilling!!!

Hardy H (kr) wrote: This movie is entertaining for me. But I am already a non-religious person who has similar point of view that he does. Which kind of is the miss point here: this movie probably will be a good time, a somewhat informative 100 mins for people like me, believe the world might just be a better place without religions. But i think Bill Maher and the director's approach and antics might be slightly too "jerky". Probably cause Bill already has him mind made up so firmly.The intended audience here is probably those who are not too religious to question the whole concept. I feel perhaps this film can make more of a difference if the tone is a bit more of an aggressive pursuit of answers rather than going out to make these people look foolish. The line is thin.

Paul P (de) wrote: I just hated the turn this movie had. When you find out the character's motives it's a huge let down. I didn't mind the idea of it, but the execution was bad.

Cleo P (es) wrote: would like to see this movie

Guido S (gb) wrote: A hitman is travelling with heads of his targets when his bag gets confused with another man's He tries to find him and deliver his heads so he can get paid. The guy finds the heads and freaks out and hijinks ensue. I felt this film was a terribly missed opportunity. A very unique idea, but that's all it is, an idea that wasn't really that flushed out. Things just happen because the script says so without any flow and the jokes for the most part are few and far between. It doesn't have any cool crime moments to offset the lack of comedy. This could have been good, has a pretty solid cast, but it is a terrible let down instead.

Noelle W (us) wrote: This movie cracks me up. I watch it with my dad twice a year, and laugh the whole way through. What a jerk.

Edith N (ag) wrote: Another of the Shortchanged Farley Granger has just died, so this is another tribute. When Elizabeth Taylor died, they said she was the last movie star. I don't think that's at all true, but Farley Granger certainly was one of the last of the old studio players. His Wikipedia entry lists several movies where he acted in them to be performing opposite various great actors, and the fact that he was under contract even after Olivia De Havilland had essentially broken the studio system was probably part of it as well. He had been with Robert Calhoun, a production supervisor for the National Repertory Theatre, since 1963, which probably didn't help his career much. This may be why it seems to me that he didn't get as much of a career as he might have. His star faded, probably at least in part because they couldn't as easily pretend he was straight, and he ended his career the way too many bright stars did--on [i]Murder, She Wrote[/i]. Here, he is Martin Lynn. Martin's father was a criminal who killed himself well before the story begins. His mother (Frances Morris) is dying of tuberculosis. Martin wants to marry his girl, Rita Conroy (Joan Evans), but he can't afford it on the salary paid him by Mr. Swanson (Houseley Stevenson), the florist who's employed him for four years. He wants to send his mother to Arizona, too, but it's too late. What's more, he won't send for Father Kirkman (Harold Vermilyea), because Father Kirkman had refused to bury Martin's father in consecrated ground. Young Father Thomas Roth (Dana Andrews) was off on another errand. Martin decides that his mother deserved better from the world, and he's determined that she get a fine funeral. Father Kirkman scoffs at the idea and won't contribute to it, and in a fit of rage, Martin kills him. Coincidentally, a theatre is robbed that same night, and the police haul Martin in for a crime he actually didn't commit. I sympathize greatly with Martin on a lot of it. It's true that the Church can't exactly provide a fine funeral for any and all parishioners. However, Father Kirkman doesn't even remember who Martin's mother is from one minute to the next, and you have to figure that they'd had lengthy conversations about Martin's father. Certainly Martin is getting screwed over by Swanson. Mr. Murray (Howland Chamberlain), the funeral director, would have loaned Martin the money for a fine funeral is Swanson hadn't treated Martin so shabbily first. It's also true that Martin had been struggling, working very hard, to find a way to get his mother into a warm, dry climate, and Swanson was realistically cheating Martin out of his due. Four years with no raise? That's not fair. The least he could have done was provide flowers, and at a reduced rate, too. Yes, it would have been a loan, but Martin was faithful enough to work there despite not getting a raise in four years. All that said, this is a desperately preachy movie. We're told the story mostly from Martin's perspective, but we're told it by Father Roth. He's explaining to another young priest why sticking it out in this particular slum is a good thing. Not because you can maybe help people like Martin, which surely ought to be the goal, but because people like Martin can help you. They can restore your faith. Because you're not them, possibly. Father Roth tells Martin that God has not given up on him, for all Martin has given up on God, but it comes across as more self-righteous than comforting. Martin is in a great deal of pain, and while it's true that he's holding onto the prospect of a fine funeral for his mother with the fervor of a child, he's got to hold onto something. If he hadn't been taking care of his mother, he could have married his girl and maybe gotten out. Maybe gone somewhere else. Maybe stayed where he was but improved himself. But we can learn a lesson from him about how to be better ourselves. Martin's problem is that he's basically decent in a place which won't let him be. Doubtless everyone around him remembered What His Father Had Done. (Not that I do, other than the suicide bit.) That's hard for a person to live down. He doesn't push Swanson for a raise--doesn't even look for a better job, which I have to tell you I would do. No, he keeps working for Swanson because his mother likes flowers. He is able to take some home for her every day, the ones which are too faded to sell. Martin is a Good Boy, and that's the film's basic problem. It's not as though he runs away after killing the priest, either. He still works to give his mother the funeral he thinks she deserves. At the last, he asks if he'll be allowed to attend her funeral. (It's not as though the ending is a surprise, given 1950. You couldn't get away with killing a priest.) He's racked with guilt, but he still has obligations which come before his own needs. That's what got him into all this in the first place.

Michael L (it) wrote: a wonderful example of understated sports cinema verite adequately directed by michael ritchie. i put this in the same category of bang the drum slowly for its subtle charm and superb drama. as an avid skiier, i really enjoyed the ski footage. the techniques used to capture it was impressive for its day. also, its great to see gene hackman with hair