The Devil's Eye
The devil has a stye in his eye, caused by the purity of a vicar's daughter. To get rid of it, he sends Don Juan up from hell to seduce the 20 year old Britt-Marie and to rob her of her virginity and her belief in love. She however can resist him and things get even turned around when Don Juan falls in love with her. The fact that he feels love for the first time now, makes him even less attractive to her and Don Juan returns to hell.
- Stars:Jarl Kulle, Bibi Andersson, Stig Järrel, Nils Poppe, Gertrud Fridh, Sture Lagerwall, Georg Funkquist, Gunnar Sjöberg, Torsten Winge, Axel Düberg, Kristina Adolphson, Allan Edwall, Ragnar Arvedson, Gunnar Björnstrand,
- Director:Ingmar Bergman,
- Writer:Ingmar Bergman (screenplay)
The devil has a stye in his eye, caused by the purity of a vicar's daughter. To get rid of it, he sends Don Juan up from hell to seduce the 20 year old Britt-Marie and to rob her of her ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
The Devil's Eye torrent reviews
(es) wrote: More of the same. If you liked the first two you should like this one. I did.
(nl) wrote: Watchable. But I still like Mr. Destiny and Family Man a lot better (pretty much same premise)
(fr) wrote: A passable TV drama that fails to focus on one specific genre, and offers a mixture of thriller, mystery & a bit of courtroom drama. The conventional dramatic execution limits its effectiveness. Not having much expectations probably saved me the miseries, and made it a passable fare.Edit: In retrospect, I feel it'd be justifiable to rate it 3/5 for what it is.
(jp) wrote: very interesting movie
(es) wrote: Such a poweful and beautiful film. Arguably Loach's finest. The late great Brian Glover is such a cunt as the PE teacher. David Bradley is unbelievable as young Billy. The ending is a right kick in the jaffas.
(br) wrote: Boring. But how? Something like this should have just been amazing, right? Wrong. Yes, the characters and the plot is all there, but if it doesn't mesh together perfectly, it can all fall apart. No, it's not terrible. It's not the most cohesive film in the world. The intro is just ridiculous and doesn't explain anything, but there are some nice plot twists that come along the way. The end of the film is well, weird and ridiculous and honestly turned me off from the film. You end up seeing three time frames in Lincoln's life and I think most would admit, the young but grown Lincoln is the best.
(mx) wrote: (Film: Into the Wild) Have you ever consider abandoning what you possess for now and return the wilderness where you will be able to feel nature at a zero distance? The answer might vary from person to person, but going to the wilderness and feeling nature would definitely be a wise option whenever you are confused. The film named "Into the Wild" directed by Sean Penn is just telling us a story about this creative and meaningful idea. Good movies will never be behind the times! This is what I always keep in my mind. Into the Wild is the movie that induces people to consider the human society and the world that they are living in. It goes really deep in analyzing the relationship between nature humans. As a top student who graduated from Emory University, Christopher McCandles who is the protagonist of the film firmly abandoned all of his possessions and a brilliant career for the sake of going into the Alaskan wilderness. According to what he said in the movie, what drives him to make this incredible decision is the annoying human world and society. In McCandles' point of view, the world is just a place where people are guessing, cheating, quarreling and competing with each other, and the only way to get out of all these annoying facts is to go into the wilderness that has not been interfered by human civilization. What he did in the Alaskan Wilderness is to live on his own and do everything in a primitive way, including making fire and ancient hunting and gathering lifestyle. In this film, the item that support McCandles' spiritual world and belief insisting he live in living in the wilderness is a book about the relationship between the wilderness and human beings, which acts kind of like the religious belief. All of such detailed inner demands are vividly represented in this movie, so this movie is definitely worth your precious 2 hours and 28 minutes to watch. However, the only drawback that I found in this movie is that the plot and conversations between characters are a little bit over-complicated, for words like "When you forgive, you love. And when you love, God's light shines upon you" made me extremely confused when I watched it for the first time. Therefore, please never watch this movie with your children.
(nl) wrote: My inner fanboy is so happy right now