The Devil's in the Details

The Devil's in the Details

7 minutes from now in Nogales, Arizona, Thomas Conrad's life will forever change when he gets caught up in a Mexican cartels poetic game of drug mule chess.

After serving a brutal tour of duty, veteran soldier Thomas Conrad is looking forward to a peaceful life at home with his family. But a drug cartel's ruthless enforcer has other plans for him. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


The Devil's in the Details torrent reviews

Niya H (ru) wrote: A few stale moments. Watched the deleted scenes, some which shouldn't have been cut as they would've tied the movie together better. Good movie overall.

Yifan Y (gb) wrote: bit too cheesy but cute.

bienboom s (it) wrote: Um.......... WHAT THE CUSS IS THIS?! This is a digrace to animated films everywhere! The animation is terrilbly ugly! I can't stand to look at it it's so ugly! The plot is unoriginal, and not to menchine the ANNOYING CHARACTERS!!! I WANNA BUY THE DVD JUST SO I CAN BURN IT.

Rex B (gb) wrote: O.K., so this one passes as one of those movies you watch on a Saturday afternoon when you don't have much else to do. It's actually passable better than anything you'd get straight to DVD or made-for-TV, but not quite measuring up to feature film. As a fan of the make-up effects in movies (i.e,. blood and gore), this movie did a fine job of impressing me with the realism. The first murder scene is not for the casual fan - you might want to look away. Again, this movie won't blow you away, but I've seen far worse and it hasn't a decent twist at the end.

Grant S (br) wrote: Very very bad. Incredibly lame and unfunny. The acting is even worse.

Jacob D (ca) wrote: It's a pretty chill movie, if you're a fan of Wrong Turn, you'll like this movie for sure.

Akshitha K (ru) wrote: I liked it. It would have been better to have a tragic end though.

Ryan S (de) wrote: 3.5/5. Waaaaaayyyyyy better than the first Pokemon movie. It's actually pretty exciting and fun, and Ash isn't a complete scrub for once.

Matthew D (us) wrote: Wow. This movie was incredibly stupid and irritatingly bad. I mean going into this, I wasn't expecting anything great, especially when experiencing the film years and years after its release, but after hearing about how good the first one was, I was hoping to get scared at least once. Nope. Sadly, the movie got worse and worse and the ending makes you want to punch your TV screen. I wonder what goes through the mind of the people in this situation, especially the scientist. So many dumb decisions made by her, its just flat out irritating! Then the boyfriend... just wow. This movie gets only one star because I watched it with my family and we laughed at sections, but very few. This movie is just bad, I mean if you watch it with like friends then you might get a kick outta it, and maybe those who grew up with it, but everyone else, just stay away.

Wes S (au) wrote: Another highly entertainment horror film from Stuart Gordon. It has the familarity of Re-Animator while being a different story. There are great effects, silly moments, and a overall cool story. The ending is a bit weak. Great cast and strong characters.

Paul C (ca) wrote: Easily the best movie of all time, perfect in every way possible.

Kurt B (es) wrote: Although pale in comparison to the novel, and vague regarding the war itself, this is an adequate adaptation in the light of when it was made.

Tim M (mx) wrote: Granted this movie worked better a decade ago when Bacon's acting wasn't so. . . 90s? But the story feels original, if only the dialogue was fresher.