The Expedition

The Expedition

A taxi driver attempts to introduce his cab service in rural Bengal against many odds.

A taxi driver attempts to introduce his cab service in rural Bengal against many odds. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Satyajit Ray - Abhijaan (1962)Other26421.36 GB
Download   Bengali Movie - Abhijaan ( 1962 ) - Satyajit Ray's FilmOther4627458.7 MB

The Expedition torrent reviews

jj t (de) wrote: Cartoonish,yet entertaining.

Sbastien P (ag) wrote: (pas d'accents parce que Flixter ne les prend pas) Ma premiere impression du film fut assez mauvaise. Je pensais avoir vu un des pires films quebecois des dernieres annees Apres coup, je me suis dit que j'avais ete trop severe. J'ai trouve le film mal joue, aucunement drole et meme comme film noir c'etait nul en termes de personnages, d'atmosphere et d'histoire. Pourtant, certains ont compare "Cadavres" aux films de grands realisateurs tels que Tarantino, les freres Cohen et Jeunet (plus particulierement le genial Delicatessen). Laissez-moi vous dire que le realisateur Eric Canuel n'arrive pas a leurs chevilles. Je me demandais pourquoi ce film semblait avoir disparu de la carte apres avoir fait la couverture du journal Voir. Je crois simplement que c'est parce qu'il y eut de tres mauvaises critiques, peu de publicite et tres peu de semaines en salle. Cadavres est base sur un roman noir de Francois Barcelo, un Quebecois, qui parvint a se faire publier en France chez Gallimard ce qui est un exploit en soi. Je serais vraiment curieux de savoir ce que l'auteur pensa de cette adaptation mais je doute fort qu'il en fut heureux. Pour tout vous dire, d'apres le resume et le type d'histoire noir et absurde, j'etais en plein le type de public a qui ca aurait du plaire. Avant le film, j'avais meme considere acheter le roman. Apres le film, j'ai ete si amerement decu que ca m'a fait reconsiderer mon achat.Les personnages sont tres caricaturaux, trop caricaturaux selon moi, tombant dans le ridicule pas credible. Julie LeBreton est bonne actrice mais sa performance tombe trop souvent dans le mauvais soap poche surtout lorsqu'elle pete des crises de nerfs ou fait sa seductrice. Je me suis farci le commentaire du realisateur et j'esperais qu'il m'explique que ce jeu inegal etait du au fait que dans certaines situations, elle se voyait comme son alter-ego d'inspecteure de srie B policire. Patrick Huard se tire relativement bien d'affaire dans un role ingrat et neutre mais il est encore trop beau, meme pouilleux, pour etre totalement credible. Christian Begin dans le role du policier aurait eu une penalite de cabotinage en improvisation. A part une couple de rares repliques comiques, le film n'arrive pas a amuser. Plus souvent qu'autrement, je roulais mes yeux en voyant la stupidite et l'insipidite de situations supposement humoristiques (la palme allant a la fosse septique). Je vais donner du credit au decor delabre mais colore de la maison (l'action se tient surtout la), a certaines trouvailles visuelles et a quelques mouvements de camera ingenieux (quoique probablement copies de meilleurs films dont Requiem for a Dream). Voila pourquoi je lui donne une demi etoile de plus. Contrairement a certaines personnes plus sensibles, je n'ai pas ete offense par le cote glauque, les tabous explores et les scenes de nudite et je pourrais meme feliciter (un peu) Canuel pour son audace. L'audace et une certaine qualite technique ne peuvent pas tout excuser dans ce film plutot rate et minable, comme la plupart des personnages d'ailleurs. C'est aeviiter comme location a moins que vous ne payiez vraiment pas cher. Qui sait, peut-etre que vos attentes seront si basses que vous ne pourrez etre qu'agreablement surpris. Vous pourrez me dire merci alors ;-)

Marcus M (ru) wrote: Got EXACTLY as much as I expected

kelly (jp) wrote: My Logline: A Dirty Little Slut with a Forbidden Big Crush. A great art house portrait of loneliness, squalor, and sexual desire. Great anonymous sex scenes and some truly great erotic cinematography very partial to the callipygian lead. (I'd recommend a jerk before you watch this if you're ten percent the horndog that this main character is). There is very little dialogue but swimming pools of unspoken communication, tense as a hard-on and spread like petroleum jelly. The grungy filth is there though; this character is a garbage worker living in the streets, garbage warehouse, and rented rooms who steals from garbage bins for masturbatory articles of clothing and sneaks about his obsession's property. Don't read past the spoiler if you want to watch this. The problem with this film is the ambiguity of the pivotal point which causes the ending of the final act. It's not the (chronologically) non-linear editing of the scenes that bothers me, but the story; BIG SPOILER - I dislike the options of scenarios that are offered regarding the outcome of the capture and rape. Problem: in one scenario (the first scene actually) the guy is lovin Sergio pounding him in the kinky gear (when I first saw it, I didn't know it was non-consensual; I thought it was just some fetish stuff as both parties looked to be having intense pleasure.). In the other, Sergio just drags the guy out to street and leaves him somewhere, the only bit of action being Sergio dry humping him (without the zipper on the latex suit open) whilst securing his bonds. I want to know if Sergio degrades into the animalistic swine he is at the conclusion of the film because he has totally fulfilled his fantasy or he's completely pitifully failed at his attempt. Maybe the point is that both would lead to the ending's savage lack of humanity and loss of identity; that's pretty common of art house, but had I wrote it, I would have definitively picked one and explored THAT subsequent theory instead. Me myself, would be better that he got the more glorified version and fell into such utter despair that he no longer needs to function as a human so reverts to a primordial state, no longer able to exist in the human context, as opposed to failing at such a thing, stooping so low and doing something so primal, causes a human to lose their humanity (this answer is just flatter and more common sense as opposed to revealing like my choice).ADDED NOTE NON-SPOILERmovie is loaded with sexually explicit scenes, plenty of nudity - lots of cok and arse, with some hot sucking and unusual masturbation."So Fucked Up" highlight: digging through trash for masturbatory material and then using it in combo with some auto-erotic asphyxiation

Karim W (it) wrote: It's a Shyam Benegal film; obviously worth seeing. But what makes this film special is its painfully beautiful soundtrack. Aarti Anklikar's thumris sound as authentic as they can be. Kiran Kher deserves a nod.

Scott R (br) wrote: Cher totally transforms in a truly all-time great performance, but the rest of the film is wholly unremarkable. It thinks it is making a deep statement on true love, but I don't see it.