The movie revolves around the Joneses, a seemingly perfect family, who are the envy of their posh, suburban neighborhood filled with all the trappings of the upper middle class. It's only when the Joneses are confronted with an unexpected disaster that they finally discover who they really are beneath the glossy veneer of consumerism. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
A seemingly perfect family moves into a suburban neighborhood, but when it comes to the truth as to why they're living there, they don't exactly come clean with their neighbors.
You may also like
The Joneses torrent reviews
William W (ag) wrote: Not up to the standard of the previous one. I felt both characters were tired in this one. Absolutely not the best one of H C Pang. Just up to 3 stars standard.
Adam R (es) wrote: (First and only viewing - In my mid-twenties)
Cody B (au) wrote: This time, we're stealing the President.
Jordan P (gb) wrote: Following the basic beats of the first two installments without bringing anything new to the table except a fresh batch of teenage corpses, Final Destination 3 is probably the least inspired chapter in this gore-filled series -- more disturbing, more violent and even more tedious the third time around.
Bruce B (ru) wrote: Never Judge A Film By Its Cover, I have seen this film on the shelves 100 times and passed it up. I'm not a big Christopher Walken Fan, but I do enjoy Michael Caine. So I finally decided to watch this one and what I saw was a very enjoyable movie with a great sound track. About a father (Michael Caine) who only last wish is to see his son (Christopher Walken). Soon after he appears dies and before he dies he leaves his son, grandson and great grandson instructions for a road trip, which makes the movie most enjoyable. The purpose is to get these three back together. All died a fabulous job, 4 1/2 stars 4-21-12
Anna S (ru) wrote: Sloow. Way longer than it needs to be. And there's an awful scene.
Jeff B (br) wrote: Mental illness is the only way to describe these people.
Luigi R (jp) wrote: I thought this film was better than "Village", it had a underlying cold war metaphor and great acting by the kids. I saw this film when I was 7 years old and was very moved by their actions at the end of the film.
Sarah F (nl) wrote: I can't think of any Anthony Mann movie I didn't like. There must be one out there but this isn't one, even if its not in the same caliber as Winchester '73 or The Naked Spur. Coop is a little old for this role but I think they make it work and Lee J. Cobb is just always fun on screen. Still, its really Mann's touch that raises this Western above so many others. I think Mann's Western's being so personal, maybe as a result form all is earlier Noirs, keeps his work fresh and relevant, I'd even argue more so then John Ford.
Private U (gb) wrote: Fantastic middle-class domestic noir from Fritz Lang. One of Lang's best.
James H (ca) wrote: Wonderful romantic comedy with a great cast. Ginger Rogers and Jimmy Stewart make a great team. The supporting cast is outstanding, especially Beulah Bondi and Charles Coburn as Stewart's parents. Great pace, well written and directed.
Michael S (gb) wrote: Just awful. Pointless sequel has none of the charm of "Get Shorty." Only James Woods is worth watching in this, and he's dead after the first five minutes.
Karl L (mx) wrote: William Shakespeare's tragic "Hamlet" is my favorite play -- one of the most mysterious and open to interpretation of all time (and thus there have been and will be many different takes on it) -- and so I watch it with a closer eye than most. In this outing, what has been done with the meager stage is commendable -- particularly a black, mirror-titled floor that gives the room an unsettling feeling. The film does have a darker atmosphere than most filmed productions, which is a step in the right direction for once, and the effort is evidently there to make this likely dazzling stage production into a movie. However, as time begins to drag in the second half and we realize the director has no more cinematic tricks in store for us, the film starts to fail to translate, outstays its welcome. That's not to say director Gregory Doran does not come up with some unsettling images -- he's mostly helped from his cast I think. The action here pales in comparison to other filmed versions.Kenneth Branaugh's film suffered from many of the same problem, he did not re-imagine it for film so much as plop it on, this film makes some more interesting use of camera angles as well as the faces of the perfect cast. The performances are inspired and delicately nuanced. Polonius, Ophelia, Laertes are decent but the real find is the sweet-natured Horatio, one of the best we've had alongside one of the best Gertrudes (a little unsure of her new husband, devastated by the possibility of madness in her son, not the witch Hamlet makes her out to be, caring and sensible), the best Claudius and the ominous and ruthlessly haunting ghost father of Hamlet (both played by a masterful Patrick Stewart -- this is some of his strongest work an actor) who is so careful in how he acts he is virtually unreadable. What exactly does Claudius think? All of his actions have two layers and Stewart's performance can be considered from two perspectives at any moment. Then there's the eccentric/sardonic/neurotic Hamlet played by David Tennant -- an impressive, unforgettably inventive, high-wire performance that takes big risks but never steps wrong. His key is to make Hamlet an intellectual... but one that is also a bit of a Steve Coogan kook, perhaps too clever for his own good, or worse just weird. His turmoil comes from being bothered by ideas. This is much different and more playful than the spoiled rich emo mess Hamlet played by Ethan Hawke in a very fitting contemporary update of Hamlet and the raging, mother-loving nut that is Gibson's Hamlet. (Branaugh and Olivier just played themselves as Hamlet, neither performance intrigues me.) Tennant's may be the greatest yet.And this film gets much right where others have been too literal, simplistic or condescending towards the material. From beginning to end we can never be sure whether Claudius is guilty or not and though Hamlet seems to be spinning into lunacy there is a sort of genius to Tennant's work here that keeps us on the edge of the doubt: perhaps there is a method to Hamlet's madness? As for the Royal Shakespeare's Company approach to turning their expertly designed staged productions into films, it's not so much their budget that fell short, nor was it the considerable talent assembled, and certainly not a lack of intelligence in reading the play but maybe a lack of imagination in capturing it. Still, they wouldn't be the first to miss there, and this more complex and enigmatic "Hamlet" and Hamlet may be a sign of things to come.
Mike H (au) wrote: how rotten tomatoes gave this a 22% is ridiculous, this is one of adam sandlers best movies!
Daniel W (ca) wrote: Alicia Vikander is a great actress. The First World War was an awful thing.