The Little Princess
The classic Shirley Temple film in which a little girl goes in search of her father who is reported missing by the military during World War I.
|Download||Shirley Temple - The Little Princess (1939) - 2Lions-Team||Other||43||34||3.78 GB|
|Download||Shirley Temple Collection 12 BoxSet DVDRip x264 MKV||DVDRip||35||37||4 GB|
You may also like
The Little Princess torrent reviews
Adityo K (ca) wrote: I like it. A classical chinese fairy tale movie about a hero and a legend
Jeremy B (de) wrote: 1/2 star because I can't give it 0.
Gavin S (es) wrote: Steve Coogan is hilarious. The banter between him and Rob Brydon is almost worth the price of admission on it's own. Truly funny, but also a fascinating look at how movies are made. A great parallel between an "unfilmable" novel and how "unwatchable" the film is. (It isn't unwatchable but the film goes to show how absolutely chaotic things are, which Stephen Fry mentions, is also the main gist of the novel.) I'd definitely watch this again, just to see if it holds up.
Steve R (nl) wrote: Perhaps the quintessential "late film," Kurosawa uses the stories of a retired professor and his endearing relationships to his loyal students, his wife, and two cats as a sounding board to reflect upon mortality and its relationship to history. For a director who seemed to pack quick and hurried exposition into the first acts of his earlier films (this tendency nearly mars even his best film, 'High and Low') the patience and leisurely pace of this film are a revelation.
Russ B (nl) wrote: 9/4/2016: Pretty bad. A sequel was was not needed at all and this movie proved the point. The plot was horrible and the acting wasn't much better. The martial arts were ok at best.
peggy (kr) wrote: It's kind of bad, but it's got one of my favorite songs of all times, "A Secretary is Not a Toy".
Andrew J (fr) wrote: Very good, but a little slow. But I will chalk that off to watching the "Director's cut" which ended up NOT being the director's cut (meaning it had a lot of parts the director thought was unnecessary)
Blake P (mx) wrote: Unless it's delivered with a smile, body horror isn't much my forte. When tongues aren't firmly in cheek a la "The Evil Dead" or "Re-Animator," I couldn't care less about pounds of gore and goop being splattered about with unsightly griminess. Because the viewing of a film that gets its jollies from toying with its characters' bodily functions is already psychologically heavy enough as it is, important is a sense of humor that assures us that its maker is a cinephile with a dark vision and not a disturbed self-proclaimed artiste provided with a decent enough budget by a surprisingly willing studio. Not that I'm primed to call Clive Barker, the mastermind behind the ins-and-outs of the unpleasant "Hellraiser," disturbed per se - that'd be insulting to his quote unquote array of talents. What I'd prefer to call him is a faux horror maestro with a bad habit of believing that horror and gore are synonymous. He presents his images of bodily destruction and moral incineration not with a side dish of dread nor with a sprinkling of tension but with flat detachment. Like the more grotesque works to come out of David Cronenberg's oeuvre, with images of "Videodrome" and "Dead Ringers" coming to mind, we leave "Hellraiser" feeling uncomfortable, dirty. This is an ugly film, devoid of emotion and human decency. Its special effects are magnificent, all convincing gobbledegook that make the right impressions. But aside from the proficiency of the art department, the film makes for a brutal experience, able to inspire depressed winces and blatant misery but not much else. How could it rouse anything else, anyway, if the movie follows an unhappily married woman's (Clare Higgins) sinful quest to complete the reincarnation of her undead lover (Sean Chapman) by killing innocents? There is more to the story, I suppose. That said undead lover got himself killed in the first place by purchasing an exotic puzzle box able to transport him into the underworld (which eventually becomes a major plot device), and that said unhappily married woman is currently married to her deceased boyfriend's brother (Andrew Robinson). But I'd rather not get into the details of "Hellraiser" because it'd do nothing besides force me to relive the torment I experienced during viewing. Unlike the thrill-seeking zeitgeist of most horror movies, the film flops around in a puddle of dejection and carnage, never to do anything besides arouse disgust. "Hellraiser" has ample opportunity to be something more than a dour mood piece - it could have fun with the introduction of its side antagonists, the Cenobites (a legendary bunch led by the instantaneously recognizable Pinhead), and it could use its gore as an exaggerative measure to complement the eccentric nightmarishness of its central conflict. But Barker seems to prefer static suffering to persuasive emotional manipulation, which might be fine for him and for the not-so faint of heart but not so much for anyone who craves pulse pounding fear in their horror movies. Because this is a behemoth of evil targeting the gag reflex more than the mind and the heart, I'm more inclined to recommend staying clear of its callous ways. Its protagonists are thinly sketched, its antagonists one-note in their maleficence. But if flesh ripping and blood spewing and concepts of never-ending trauma is up your alley, "Hellraiser" is more than likely a movie worth seeing. That just doesn't mean I have to like it for everything it somehow manages to do right.