The Secret of the Nutcracker
In this innovative version of the world famous Christmas story, The Secret of the Nutcracker tells of 12 year-old Clara's magical journey on Christmas Eve to find her father in a World War II Prisoner of War camp. Along with her mother and her two brothers, they long for some word on him, which eventually comes from an unexpected source the mysterious and magical stranger Drosselmeyer, who befriends Clara and encourages her to believe that miracles can happen.
- Stars:Patrick Huard, Julie LeBreton, Sylvie Boucher, Christopher Heyerdahl, Marie Brassard, Christian Bégin, Patrice Robitaille, Hugolin Chevrette-Landesque, Bill Baksa, Katherine Bennett, Graeme Black, Jemma Blackwell, Michele Bogdanow, Tom Carey, Brian Cox, Joe D'Addetta, Ryan Grantham, Christopher Gray, Ricardo Hoyos, Janelle Jorde, Helene Joy, Rainer Kahl, David McNally,
- Director:Eric Till,
- Writer:John Murrell
In this innovative version of the world famous Christmas story, 12-year-old Clara takes a magical journey on Christmas Eve to find her father in a World War II Prisoner of War camp. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
The Secret of the Nutcracker torrent reviews
(mx) wrote: I am a meat and cheese eater, but have considered going Vegetarian for a while and have tried a few times. This documentary has provoked my interest in becoming a full vegan. I recommend this to be watched by EVERYONE! It explains in simple terms what vegans are and why the chose their lifestyle. It also gives fact-based information regarding impact on health, animal cruelty and the environment.
(jp) wrote: decent, funny, entertaining, hot girls, and drugs. Good music, good movie
(au) wrote: Wanted dark sense of humor to enjoy this movie. Although it may be a little corny, it definitely appealed to me as being extremely hilarious like I said though only if you like black humor. I would buy this movie because I like the eclectic things like this. Plus it was filmed in my best friend's home town in Montana.
(es) wrote: Zack Snyder's remake of the classic that I personally found boring, is perfectly paced, thrilling, gorey, funny, frightening, expertly shot and edited, and an all around fun experience. This is as good as zombie movies get.
(de) wrote: An accident leads to death. The death leads to another accident. And the second accident leads to... This is the chain reaction that starts off Douglas Sirk's "Magnificent Obsession." Rock Hudson plays Bob Merrick, a thrill-seeking bachelor, who, at a need for speed, crashes his boat on a lake. He survives but his rescuing inadvertently claims another life -- the well-loved Doctor Philips. The community is heartbroken and grudgingly despises the hedonistic Merrick, who's no trade-off for the philanthropic doc. Out of guilt, Merrick reaches out to Helen Philips (Jane Wyman), the doctor's widow. He offers her money but she refuses. But he's persistent; he's gung-ho to be a better person and do good deeds. This I'd-like-to-help-you / get-away-from-me tug-of-war inevitably leads to another accident. This time, it is at Helen's expense. And waiting in the wings, Bob Merrick is still the eager helper ... and perhaps still the magnet for bad luck. "Magnificent Obsession" deeply intrigued me at first; I even became engaged at its philosophical direction. Its sequence of events resonated like an episode of "Lost" and had me asking questions. What if there is a higher power at play? What if Merrick is prone to cause accident even if he wants to do good deeds? The first hour had a metaphysical undertone, touching upon themes of redemption and second chances. But alas, the plot develops a bit contrived. Those who find the premise unlikely will laugh at the later developments. The film also suffers a common pitfall for romantic films: the split-em-apart contrivance. Oh why, why, why! The second half had me shaking my head and questioning the story's logic instead of its deeper meanings. The perspective on the title itself is even misleading. The "obsession" to me seems more over a woman rather than the act of good doing. The movie disappoints but my thumb quivers to point slightly upwards. This is my first Douglas Sirk film. I can't pinpoint it but Sirk creates an aura of something soft and delicate. And yet, you can't really call this film timid. It does gather momentum and it's unabashedly sentimental (sometimes good, sometimes awful). I admit I'm still intrigued at how his other movies turned out. If coupled with a great story, his aesthetics can produce a great piece of work. Not quite an obsession but it could ignite a chain reaction for me to watch another Douglas Sirk movie ... and another ... and another.
(nl) wrote: This was not my favorite movie, but I did enjoy it.
(it) wrote: Saw the movie twice, each time it get's better
(de) wrote: One of Moore's better films, with an investigative and optimistic tone.