The Thirteenth Floor

The Thirteenth Floor

Computer scientist Hannon Fuller has discovered something extremely important. He's about to tell the discovery to his colleague, Douglas Hall, but knowing someone is after him, the old man leaves a letter in his computer generated parallel world that's just like the 30's with seemingly real people with real emotions.

In 1937, computer scientist Hannon Fuller has discovered something extremely important. When Fuller is murdered just as he begins premature testing of the VR system, his friend and protégé, Douglas Hall, becomes the primary suspect. The evidence against him is so strong that Hall begins to doubt his own innocence. The truth is harsher than he could ever imagine... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

The Thirteenth Floor torrent reviews

Cheryl J (es) wrote: <3 GoOd & FuNnY MoViE FoR FaMiLy To WaTcH <3

Steven W (us) wrote: Coco Chanel is probably my favorite performance by Shirley MacLaine. Not knowing how much is poetic license, it is an excellent look at the lives, ideals, and courage of that generation which founded the Modern world. Less blatant are the indicators of how visionaries like Chanel really bridged the post-war world's cultural scene between the declining Empires of Europe and the naive pragmatism of 1950s America. I have always liked films that open up new worlds to my interest.

Nuno C (jp) wrote: A dark film with a strong anti gun theme. Such caring characters all living with or so close to the typical gun problem in the US. You can't help but feel sad for everyone and the fact that things probably won't change.

Jeremy W (gb) wrote: It is a nostalgic film from my childhood, and its important for me, i want to see it on Blu-Ray! I had to write this review because i have a problem with people that think a film has to be hilarious, to be a good movie, or be extremely funny to be of any worth. there is a - Captain Ron 1992 720p WEB-DL DD5 1 H 264 - which looks horribly compressed, and that's why i would buy on Blu-Ray!

Shana S (it) wrote: Although I loved it, these types of movies make me angry.

Sierra H (fr) wrote: Cute...But Pointless

jay n (ca) wrote: Fun mystery thriller. Sophia looks incredible as are her clothes. She and Gregory Peck have a good chemistry. Most enjoyable.

John M (br) wrote: There's some amazing stuff in here that makes it somewhat the classic it is but at the same time just awful cheesey 70s stuff that kind of drags it down more than charms it, especially the ending. Regardless, I like how the film is more about a mood than a plot and it's definitely influential to a lot of similar films in the 80s, 90s that are very memorable such as Boogie Nights, Swingers.

Shelly l (mx) wrote: It freak me out when I was little....Is a 70's tv movie creepy delight.....

Tiberio S (kr) wrote: This is what makes a great franchise film; it's the start of something totally new that nobody has yet seen, even though the franchise itself is over 40 years old. It's a powerful film, more than a Bond-formula exercise. I consider this the best directed Bond film, yet it's the toughest to revisit because of the hard emotions is plays on. Bond film or not, this is some excellent cinema. I have three criticisms, which aren't enough to deter my rating. First, the noir opening was vague and unnecessarily black and white. I thought it should've been longer, given us more context, and something a little smarter than a man reaching for a gun whose bullets have been taken. It's only there to establish that Bond get his two kills to become a 00 agent, then does nothing for the rest of the film. It serves character development, not story, which is somewhat forgivable. My second complaint is the epic free-run chase. It's grand, it's one of the best action chase scenes ever put to film, and yet the story of it is extremely confusing and outright dumb. If Bond ends up shooting him, why go through all that? The results of it were pointless. Lastly, the confusion of Mathis in the latter half of the film. I understand that Le Chifre is being tricky, spurring an already paranoid Bond into confusion, but it kind of loses me along the way. How Mathis is ultimately taken care of, getting zapped at Bond's retreat, is awkward and unsatisfying. We won't understand much until the sequel. On the point of humor in Bond. Something sprung to mind when I remembered that Sam Mendes called for a rewrite of SPECTRE because it needed more 'humor.' That's a dangerous thing to ask for, and I think SPECTRE kind of failed at it. What is humor? Bond movies have a lot of throwaway, one-time laugh bits, I won't call them jokes. In the Craig series, these are painfully dry bits of 'hmph' reactions that aren't really funny. Moore films were laugh out loud campy, perhaps a bit too much at times. Connery's charm and wit laid over the pace at which his stories moved made for perfect humor. I think Casino is the only film that works with humor because of the established overhead, something the followups all fail to have. There's inherent humor in a dangerous person becoming a 00, battling the system and his own demons. Situation, setup makes lasting humor. In SPECTRE, it's things like falling on a couch, Bond calling himself Mickey Mouse, or pretending he's in control when captive at Blofeld's lair. The latter might be the most effective. I guess the problem is that I see it too clearly, I see the throwaways coming as a result of a humor-drive rewrite, and it seems like lazy writing. Where can we be funny and add something in? Rather than changing the context from a higher level. The laugh bits in Skyfall are the most brutal, just useless one-liners that are reaching for nothing. I don't see that Casino has to work as hard for it. Even when he says something like, "that's because you know what I can do with my little finger," it's all coming from the context of immaturity; the film is about failing as a 00 because of this cocky, boyhood hero-complex. It's an unsuccessful mission with a few battles won, which is really different for any movie like this. And he's falling into a trap, the style of the filmmaking at this point drastically changes - we almost forget it's a Bond adventure, it feels like an indy romance. It does a good job at getting us lost here for awhile. The result is something lasting.This film is a solid setup for a new franchise, one that will ultimately deal with consequences in each chapter, unlike any Bond series before it. It has that 'end-is-beginning' element, setting up Mr. White as the person who will unfold more details behind a grand conspiracy over the next several chapters, and leaving us with a line that usually comes much earlier: "the name is Bond, James Bond." Sequel setups usually suck, but because the focus is so deep on Le Chifre and his operation, and because that story is entirely dealt with, nothing is left unsatisfying.

Troy K (ru) wrote: 2.5/5 Better than I was expecting, but can't really recommend it. If you do watch it then make sure your get the unrated version.

Siri B (it) wrote: The idea was good. That's the best I can say. I fell asleep during the "exciting" bits...