The Woman in Red
When a happily married family man, who would never consider an affair, meets a beautiful woman in red, he is totally infatuated and desperate to make her acquaintance. However, as he tries out various schemes to sneak out to meet her, he realizes that adultery is not quite as easy as it looks.
- Category:Romance, Comedy
- Stars:Gene Wilder, Charles Grodin, Joseph Bologna, Judith Ivey, Michael Huddleston, Kelly LeBrock, Gilda Radner, Kyle T. Heffner, Michael Zorek, Billy Beck, Kyra Stempel, Robin Ignico, Viola Kates Stimpson, Danny Wells, Buddy Silberman,
- Director:Gene Wilder,
- Writer:Jean-Loup Dabadie (screenplay), Yves Robert (screenplay), Gene Wilder
A happily married family man, who would never consider an affair, meets a beautiful model in red, since then he starts to spy her, and becomes obsessed with meeting and possibly courting her. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
The Woman in Red torrent reviews
(ru) wrote: You basically know how this will end, but getting there is a pretty good ride. Story basically revolves around a student finally getting his Masters and becoming a Professor, which his father is a local legend in the field. He and his friends also enter into a local Trivial Pursuit contest.The lead actor is pretty solid, and his two buddies in the contest are pretty good and I feel like they could have made an entire film just about those three guys playing the game.The heart of the movie comes from Arielle Kebbel, who has never looked more adorable than in this film. She kind of goes from the girl you want him to get to kind of a mean annoying person back to the sweet thing during the film, and one of the bigger issues I had was how it ended between them at the end of the film, given you could tell how good they were together.
(nl) wrote: The only take away from this movie is the realism of the story in contemporary Philippines.
(gb) wrote: love the show...like the designers, love the info presented in the film. :)
(ag) wrote: This is disturbing. If you have an interest in politics, or in software testing, or in computer security, or you didn't vote for Bush - you need to see this film. Three words. ELECTION SOFTWARE FAIL.
(kr) wrote: I absolutely love the idea of "Jumper" as a concept and potential storyline, but this one wasn't as good as it could have been.
(ru) wrote: Este cambio de aires en las pelculas de animacin de Batman resulta ser flojo pero a la vez interesante. Se deja ver.
(fr) wrote: The Beyond offers gore aplenty along with supernatural frights, but lacks a cohesive enough story to make it really transcend. 3 1/2 stars
(au) wrote: THIS MOVIE WAS HILARIOUS....
(it) wrote: Who thought this one up? It couldn't be more blissfully goofy if it tried. Fun for kids. I admit liking it when I was a 9 year old.
(ag) wrote: John Huston nos presenta una estilizada cinta de suspenso con varios giros de tuerca y con un solido Paul Newman y un perverso James Mason. Los fanaticos de "Get Carter" se sorprenderan con esta joya injustamente destrozada por la critica en su momento. Todo un clasico del genero del espionaje.
(ru) wrote: Saw this movie when I was quite young and it made a big impact.From a purely visual standpoint its compelling. Has a dreamlike quality to it.More importantly the story is told well and painful, haunting and beautiful to witness at the same time.
(gb) wrote: The hero of this mediocre adaptation, Sam, keeps citing Thoreau. I can only suspect he'd never actually read any. Sam is more than twice the woodsman Thoreau was. It's true that both Sam and Thoreau were living on family land. However, there was no longer a house on Sam's land, whereas Thoreau didn't spend an entire day alone pretty much the entire time--and he ate dinner at his mother's more often than not. I first encountered [i]My Side of the Mountain[/i] when Mrs. Razum, my fourth grade teacher, read it aloud to us after lunch. I first became aware that there was a movie version when I acquired a movie cover copy. As Graham puts it, I won't be collecting this one. It's not exactly that it's a bad adaptation, although several major plot points are altered and several characters are left out entirely. (Also, it's been shifted in location from the Catskills to Canada; in the book, Sam is from Manhattan, but the movie Sam is from Toronto.) However, it's not good enough to make me want to watch it again. It's just close enough to be irritating, because there are so many little things that are wrong. For example, Movie Sam takes a raccoon with him when he leaves home. Book Sam does not; where in an overcrowded Manhattan apartment would he keep it? What's more, Movie Sam's raccoon is named Gus, and Book Sam's befriended wild raccoon is Jesse James. That's more than a little different. Movie Sam is experimenting on algae and completely neglects Book Sam's acorn flour for noxious algae concoctions that not even he likes. Oh, yeah--and the endings are completely different. I hate when that happens.
(fr) wrote: So lame, I couldn't watch 15 minutes.
(fr) wrote: Nothing really happens, but that doesn't make it unenjoyable. Plus, Ruffalo.