The Year of the Wolf

The Year of the Wolf

Sari is a young, beautiful and intelligent girl who is busy studying at university,but she suffers from epilepsy and has to face death on a daily basis. Mikko is hersomewhat older university teacher, who is tired of life, and who one day decides toabandon his wife, children and idea of a perfect life. Both characters have been tooscared to live their lives to the brim for too long. But they meet, and in spite oftheir prejudices and reserved natures, they manage to create a dramatic and movingmodern romance which confronts numerous taboos. While the imagery explores theboundary between life and death in a most poetic way, the odd couple's romance istold with both bite and humour. Society - be it in the shape of angry ex-wives,overprotective parents, conservative aunts or embittered colleagues - is doing whatit can to put a spanner in the works."

Sari is a young, beautiful and intelligent girl who is busy studying at university,but she suffers from epilepsy and has to face death on a daily basis. Mikko is hersomewhat older university teacher, who is tired of life, and who one day decides toabandon his wife, children and idea of a perfect life. Both characters have been tooscared to live their lives to the brim for too long. But they meet, and in spite oftheir prejudices and reserved natures, they manage to create a dramatic and movingmodern romance which confronts numerous taboos. While the imagery explores theboundary between life and death in a most poetic way, the odd couple's romance istold with both bite and humour. Society - be it in the shape of angry ex-wives,overprotective parents, conservative aunts or embittered colleagues - is doing whatit can to put a spanner in the works." . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

The Year of the Wolf torrent reviews

JeanPhilippe G (ca) wrote: While it has it's moments and Arnold isn't bad in the film, the special effects are dated, the dialogue is terrible and it's extremely boring at times, even though there are some corny one liners in the process.

Matthew B (ag) wrote: Football Factory and Dead Man Running co-stars Tamer Hassan and Danny Dyer reunite once more for this apocalyptic thriller set in London. A man awakes to find the streets eerily silent and all trace of life completely removed. This movie lacks on characters and story. the movie is boring to watch and why is Danny Dyer picking terrible movie like this.

Jason T (br) wrote: Ok this one was by far the weakest in the series with very little in the horror department. However I will say that I still enjoyed seeing pumpkinhead and always will. No matter how bad it was I still was able to find a fair amount of entertainment. It's worth one watch.

Chloe A (kr) wrote: 3 1/2 stars! I enjoyed this film a lot actually, Jessica Alba is super cute in it and there are quite a few laugh out loud moments!

Cole M (au) wrote: Brilliant, it drags you in to its romantic, seductive, and at times sleazy world. And before you know it the film is over, it will captivate you from start to finish just by using a simple, easy to follow story, that is truly original, and by creating an atmosphere that is irresistible. Clive Owen also owns this role as he typically does.

Ryan P (mx) wrote: Dragonheart is another fantasy classic. Sure it's not as good as Lord of the Rings but it's very enjoyable (and underrated). People say the Dragon is weirdly designed. He doesn't bother me at all. I also love how he plays with the knight and pretends to terrorize everyone. People may not see this movie as a masterpiece, but I do.

danny d (ru) wrote: the worst ending in movie history

bill s (gb) wrote: Weird,all over the place movie that's too much trouble to pay attention too.

Russell G (ru) wrote: The first Kung Fu film I ever saw, and it holds up. If the DVD included the original Australian dubbing from 20 years ago, it'd get an extra star. Awesome fights, and very funny.

Ian I (ag) wrote: A major improvement after Halloween 5: The curse of Michael Myers. It returns some suspense, and scariness back to the idea. It doesn't really seem like something we've seen before, even though Michael does the same thing as usual. It explains some back story and ideas about Michael's constant need to kill. The acting is alright. Donald Pleasence in his final film role is great as always as Doctor Loomis. They bring back the character of Tommy Doyle (one of the kids in the first film that Laurie Strode babysits) and they explain how the Halloween incident in 1978 and Michael Myers' haunted him for the rest of his life and some of the stuff he's done and been through since then. It also concludes the story of the character Jamie Lloyd from Halloween four and five, and has a new story idea. Therefore this Halloween film works. I don't necessarily care for the ending though.

Laura F (br) wrote: derekaggravate edge go v

David A (jp) wrote: I'm fan of Hong Kong films and the premise of this film is exciting, but the filmmakers blew this chance by using a cliche buddy cop flick that not even Tucker and Chan could save. The fight sequences are not as good or exciting as Chan's previous works. It's funny at parts, but gets tiring as the same jokes keeps on repeating over and over again. Definitely could have been funnier. A Hollywood made scrap. Sorry.

Kevin N (it) wrote: I thought it was funny, it was what it was, I laughed.

Justin C (gb) wrote: My generosity toward unnecessary action movies only stretches so far.