Ticker (2001) torrents full movies



After a San Francisco detective's partner is murdered by Northern Irish terrorists, the officer joins the bomb squad in order to bring them to justice.

Ticker is the best great movie of Paul B. Margolis. This movie was introduced in 2001. You can check list actors in this movies torrent, for example Tom Sizemore, Dennis Hopper, Steven Seagal, Jaime Pressly, Nas, Rozonda 'Chilli' Thomas, Peter Greene, Kevin Gage, Michael Halsey, Norbert Weisser, Romany Malco, Joe Spano, Mimi Rose, Tish Daniels, Linda Castro. There are many categories, such as Crime. This movie was rated by 3.5 in www.imdb.com. We have a good movies torrent. The runtime of this movie are awesome, about 92 minutes. Itachi8x is funny uploader, she is very hard-working. You should spend more time to watch this movie. If we must use one word to describe about this movies torrent, I think it should be 'Awesome', so what is your opinion. Do you know what are customers? Maria Ozawa is the best. I don't push my iPhone screen. Share with your friends and watch this movie together . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

After a San Francisco detective's partner is murdered by Northern Irish terrorists, the officer joins the bomb squad in order to bring them to justice

Ticker torrents

Ticker full movie

Ticker2001 torrent

Ticker torrent, Ticker movie torrents, download Ticker full movie, Ticker2001 torrents, download Ticker2001 torrents, watch Ticker movie, Ticker englishsub, free download Ticker movie, movie Ticker torrent

Download   Ticker [Steven Seagal] [XviD]Other5532690.03 MB
Download   Ticker 2001 (NL- Eng subs) TBS B-SAMOther37513.71 GB
Download   Ticker-AC3-2.0-DVDRip[Eng]2001DVDRip5034942.8 MB
Download   Ticker 2001 (NLsubs)(TinkerBell) TBSOther35423.71 GB
Download   [Ciclo Steven Seagal] TickerOther40484 GB
Download   Ticker (2001)DVDRip H264 [ResourceRG]DVDRip45451.5 GB
Download   Ticker (2001) (NL eng subs) TBSOther34383.71 GB
Download   Ticker.2001.iNTERNAL.DVDRip.XviD-EXViDiNTDVDRip2748701.86 MB

You may also like

Users reviews

Alexander R (kr)

The movie has some fun; however it is still cheasy and poor! Simply stupid film

Alfredo E (ca)

boring and silly sometimes

Andy N (es)

Still find it completely weird. I've never understood Brony culture and while the documentary didn't answer all of my questions, it did shed a different light on the topic and a little more understanding on my part

Carlos I (ca)

So much damn fun! How have I not seen this until now?! Turner and Douglas have great chemistry

Caroline P (nl)

hat could be better than an existentialist romance?. If you don't like being forced to think about what you're seeing, then you probably won't like this

Daniel P (gb)

A beautiful visual poem to a bruised but beguiling city

Howard E (it)

It's probably not going to change the way you view the world, but it is good entertainment and sometimes that's just enough. VINCENT works best because of its honesty. ST. Fortunately, McCarthy and director/screenwriter Theodore Melfi had the good sense to let Murray be the only one getting the laughs here. (Or maybe they would?) With two clowns like Murray and McCarthy sharing the stage, the results could have been disastrous. I think a lot of single mothers would identify with her even if they themselves wouldn't ever consider leaving their child in the care of a reprobate like Vince. McCarthy, thankfully, dialled back her normal OTT shtick here to play a simple woman who struggles with the balancing act between work and family. Certainly, the scene that comes up over the closing credits was improvised. Murray is a delight with his one liners and one has to wonder if they were scripted. It does get a bit schmaltzy toward the end but, overall, the performances and the camerawork make this an enjoyable film to watch. VINCENT is somewhat of a cross between BAD SANTA and THE KARATE KID. Do you like what you're reading? Why not sign up to receive my movie reviews in your inbox every Thursday or Like my Facebook page? Too much of a commitment? How about commenting below or giving it a star rating?ST. Underneath all the gruffness, Vince really is a good guy with a good heart. Along the way, Oliver gets to see a side of Vince that many do not. Oliver takes it all in, as he thirsts for both practical life lessons and some fatherly companionship even if that father figure is more than a bit rough around the edges. He takes Oliver to a bar (isn't that slightly illegal?), teaches him how to handicap horses at the racetrack and gives him tips on how to break someone's nose with just a single jab. As we would expect, Vince begrudgingly tolerates his new charge but he's not about to let the kid change his own habits. Desperate times for both Maggie and Vince call for desperate actions. But, as we soon learn, Vince is also flat broke, so he agrees to look after Oliver - for a fee, of course. This is the last thing the grumpy old guy wants as he is quite content living out his days drinking, smoking, gambling and shtupping his Russian exotic dancer girlfriend, Daka (Naomi Watts). Being the family's sole income earner, Maggie (Melissa McCarthy) has to work long hours as a hospital technician and she has no choice but to leave Oliver (Lieberher) in Vince's (Murray) care after he finishes school for the day. When a newly divorced mom and her bright but puny pre-teenaged son move to Brooklyn, they quickly find their lives intertwined with that of their next-door neighbour - a hard boiled Vietnam vet who prefers to live life solely on his own terms. VINCENT is played by the hugely underrated Bill Murray while the boy is played by first-timer Jaeden Lieberher, who is not only too cute for words but he's a pretty good actor as well. The only difference this time around is that the curmudgeon in ST. We've seen this story many times before - a curmudgeonly guy befriends an adorable little boy (or girl) and the two of them get changed for the better in the process

Jason H (it)

really felt the scene towards the end where Tommy has to choose between polishing the cops shoe one last time or striking back, classic material all the way!. This was a really good movie

Liam H (it)

5/5. 3. It's surprising that the film it isn't a cult favourite as it probably deserves it for the special effects alone, but having said that it is part of Carpenter's back catalogue so people are still likely to embark on this forgotten gem. It's not genre-defining it's just good entertainment that is also a visual treat. Overall, 'Memoirs' has a few short-comings and is by no way one of John Carpenter's best but it IS an enjoyable film. Carpenter would return to horror after 'Memoirs' with 1994's 'In The Mouth Of Madness' which retains Sam Neill in a starring role. "It's not what it is sir, [pause] it's what it `isn't". Like Chase in the acting role, this film was a change of pace for Carpenter as a director with a more light-hearted film but it works better that one would expect and remains good viewing complete with cheesy one-liners. Surprisingly the film was directed by none other than horror/thriller favourite John Carpenter (The Thing, Halloween, Assault On Precinct 13) and remains one of his lesser known films (possibly because it doesn't challenge the audience in the way one of his horrors does). However, moments such as these could simply prove to be misconceptions considering how uncharacteristic a film it is for the director. Some moments that seem ready to prove geniunely thrilling are sometimes marred by seemingly out-of-place moments of humour. People often criticize the film for it not knowing whether it's trying to be a comedy or a thriller which is plausible. Hannah and Neil play the love interest role and main antagonist respectively to satisfaction. However it is easy to argue that he was still miscast. Chase shows diversity in a more serious role and conveys the sense of loneliness in quite a believable way and being Chevy Chase he also has the natural comedy tactility to provide the odd laugh. Obviously we're not talking stand-out performances from the cast and the story is a fairly simple one (taken from a book I believe) but it doesn't exactly prove detrimental to the quality of the film. As far as acting and narrative goes, it's an acceptable affair. This sort of novelty effects seen here possess a physicality which I don't think CGI could ever replicate, or hasn't managed yet at least. "Wait, how the hell did they do this stuff back in 1992?' The painted face sequence or when Nick is in the rain or even the simply when Nick is smoking and we see the smoke form the shape of lungs. When watching `Memoirs' it's not odd to stop yourself and think. If the film was made today, it would have most likely been bombarded with CGI and would totally lose the quirkiness and wonder created with the good old 'lights and magic'. For a special-effects heavy film that is now 20 years old and to remain almost entirely unfazed by time is a great achievement in any case. It has retained its quirky style, odd bits of humour and surprisingly the illusions of invisibility. I re-watched the film recently, years after I had first seen or even heard anything about it and I was pleased to discover that it was just as I remember. Hence `memoirs'. Nick guides us through the story by telling his tale in narrator fashion. Now, crooked CIA Agent David Jenkins (Sam Neill) is the only person who knows of Nick's current state of transparency and is trying to track him down to work as a spy and the only person Nick can turn to for help is Alice (Daryl Hannah) with whom Nick is romantically involved. He also has no family meaning he has quite literally vanished, almost without a trace. Nick, even though was a smooth-talker and a generally likable character didn't really properly connect with his friends nor would he if he could. 'Memoirs' centres around lax stock analyst Nick Halloway (a quippy and smarmy Chevy Chase) who has become invisible as the result of being the sole person left inside a nuclear laboratory during a freak accident

MEC r (nl)

I did not really like this movie