Tora-san's Runaway

Tora-san's Runaway

After an encounter with a dying yakuza's son and at his sister Sakura's urging, Torajiro attempts to change his vagrant lifestyle and become an honest worker with a steady job.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:88 minutes
  • Release:1970
  • Language:Japanese
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:sequel,  

Tora-San, an eccentric and resourceful tramp, is always cheerful. Although he is an orphan, he decides to go back home after a long absence. He thus sees again his sister Sakura Suwa, who ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Tora-san's Runaway torrent reviews

Vahni T (mx) wrote: This movie has a good concept but lacks the story. But at the end with good performances it comes out as a one time watchable movie.

Thomas F (mx) wrote: Fabulous! I couldnt imagine this piece of work could turn out to be this fascinating and surprising.

Dave J (br) wrote: Monday, December 5, 2011 (2009) Baseline Killer HORROR It was supposedly inspired by the real-life story of the infamous Phoenix serial killer arrested in 2006, but is really a film project done in the basement of a hardware funiture store focusing on pointless babblings of 8 women who're eventually become trapped since their were no windows or other openings! This is also one of those movies where the 2 serial killers know about the areas then the people that live there! It helps when you use your "fast-forward" button to save time since you can still be able to understand whats going on! 1/2 out of 4

Eppii P (ca) wrote: So sadd,,,,I love it!

Carol F (ru) wrote: Nice little film to watch on a night with nothing else to do.

Rachel G (ca) wrote: This movie is one of the fakest movies i have seen in a long time

Crystal F (gb) wrote: This movie was really good i enjoy it .. : )

Alex S (mx) wrote: Comparatively better than other Wayans Bros' efforts but still by no means recommendable, if there are any moments of inspired cleverness that exist in White Chicks they are offset by the dozens of sophomoric and mindless jokes that follow.

Kikki K (ag) wrote: Really good movie. Absolutely loved it !

Private U (mx) wrote: It's my favorite, 'cos I like Rodin, I like the story between him and Camille, and I like Isabelle Adjani. Elle est formidable!

Dipan K (ca) wrote: Only his song in the movie is good. Everything else about it sucks

Michael W (gb) wrote: This movie is a mixed bag: Go see it if you want to watch Arnie shed lawless violence with big swords. Definitely listen to the Basil Polodouris soundtrack, as it is the best part of the movie. Plotting is uneven, 90% dialogue is unimportant, and characterization almost non-existent. Also, lots of small boobs and spilled blood in a world of no right and wrong. Watch for Arnie, or watch not.

Paul D (mx) wrote: Mirrored love stories across two time periods is nothing new, but this one is not too bad although everything is all over Anglicised for an American market.

Lisa S (kr) wrote: What a hilarious movie! Especially for those who remember the 70s or just watch a lot of old movies (like me). My favourite part of the movie was Christopher Lee's small role, it was one of the funniest things I'd ever seen! The other actors in the movie are really great as well. The movie is about people who follow the 70s fads to an absurd length, and the main character played by Mull, is sick of it all. So funny. I highly recommend seeing this movie.

Michael T (fr) wrote: Melodramatic but engrossing.

Sashika P (it) wrote: Very dull and common story. Was very slow in building up and nothings happens much until the very last few minutes.

Bradley H (es) wrote: This is a wildly fascinating documentary. One of the best I've ever seen, in fact. Not only does the subject matter easily fill the 84 minute running time, but also an untold number of hours afterward, examining Vivian Maier's extraordinary body of work as a photographer.

Grant J (de) wrote: An American classic. Don't miss this one.

Gav R (mx) wrote: I can't fathom the pace or bizarre storyline. Acting and filming is good but I'm a purest, Viking set yes at turn of first millennium but crusade to holy land was 1095??? in the beginning it's good, middle it's just a bore and then gets better only when they get attacked

Alex V (it) wrote: The countless documentaries are far superior to this paint by numbers story of the story.