Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen

Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen

Sam Witwicky leaves the Autobots behind for a normal life. But when his mind is filled with cryptic symbols, the Decepticons target him and he is dragged back into the Transformers' war.

Sam Witwicky leaves the Autobots behind for a normal  life. But when his mind is filled with cryptic symbols, he is hunted by the Decepticons under the orders of an ancient Decepticon name The Fallen, who seeks to get revenge on Earth by finding and activating a machine that would provide the Decepticons with an energon source, destroying the sun and all life on Earth in the process. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Transformers: Revenge Of The Fallen torrent reviews

Oscar H (de) wrote: Ngot bttre n trean, men Helena Mattsson r en blek efterfljare till Natasha Henstridge och kopplingarna till de andra filmerna i serien r nstan obefintliga, vilket gr att denna lgbudgetrulle mest liknar ett pilotavsnitt till ngon halvskum tv-serie. Vilket det kanske var tnkt som. Som lngfilm r den i alla fall fga imponerande, ven om jag och min tittarkompanjon Henrik knappast hade koncentrationen p topp under visningen.

Mohammed A (jp) wrote: It's good movie to watch

Brett W (ru) wrote: This movie looks like it was made in somebody's backyard. I bought it at an obscure truck stop in Tennessee for $3...It's gratuitous use of full frontal nudity is what earned this movie the two stars that I gave it.

Willie J (de) wrote: The person who had the idea for a third film should be reprimanded.A horrible idea to create a third installment.

Robert I (de) wrote: I would totally party with Kogo Shuko. Best movie Scott Wolf ever made. One of my favorite sci-fi action films... wait, its based on a video game? Never heard of it.

Phil H (it) wrote: 'We're men...we're men in tights...YES! we roam around the forest looking for fights!'A strange choice for Brooks I think, he seemed to move into historical legends in the 90's along with his take on Dracula. The tag for the film is accurate I guess, this legend did have it coming for sure with so many variations out there at the time...most notably and laughably the Kevin Costner debacle. Also not forgetting the Patrick Bergin Robin Hood flick that was emulating Costner's version!Of course being a Brooks film the cast is made up of all his regulars...and I'm sure if his older regulars weren't dead he'd have used them too. Amy Yasbeck begins her brief Brooks career here as Marian before rejoining Brooks for Dracula. Dick Van Pattern is back after working with Brooks in 'High Anxiety' and 'Spaceballs', Megan Cavanagh and Matt Porretta both went on to Dracula along with Yasbeck and finally the magnificent pair of Dom Deluise and Robert Ridgely are both Brooks film veterans.Naturally there has been many liberties taken with the plot...well actually its based around other Robin Hood movies really, nothing to do with the actual fable at all. Its clear to see the classic Errol Flynn version and the classic animated Disney version are the two main influences here. Brooks pretty much follows both of these films scene for scene whilst adding his own unique brand of spoofery. This whole approach does actually work well in all honesty because you can enjoy the cartoonish tomfoolery and it also kinda harks back to a different age of cinema. Whether this was intentional or not I'm not sure, it probably just happened because they were spoofing two classic films but the quaint visuals, simple effects and colourful characters are very appealing.There is a thin line between the silly childish humour and the slightly more risky adult humour which I think is handled well. I say adult humour but its not really that bad, just a touch of toilet humour. Whilst most of the laughs fall flat I can't deny there are some nice chuckles to be had and some clever imaginative send-ups. The usual blend of visual slapstick and cheesy dialog is to be expected but much of it is all in the delivery and luckily this movie does have some noteworthy comedic performances.Its quite a surprise that Elwes does actually put in a solid funny performance as Robin Hood, what's even more surprising is the fact he does have a slightly similar resemblance to Flynn...a blonde Flynn. His little tufts of facial hair, the fact he's British, that wry smug smile of his when he fights and all tied together in the classic green and brown attire. At the same time Richard Lewis is also a great Prince John! I loved how his mole kept moving across his face in each scene and his 80's mullet hairdo, plus this guy can deliver a funny line. He has this great whiny nervous tone to his voice which really comes to life when he panics and cries 'hurt them! hurt them!!'.I also must confess to enjoying Brooks small cameo as a Rabbi, could of gone another way but the old ones are the best ones I guess. Eric Kramer is also surprisingly amusing as the towering Little John, not so much to say but he is good with the visual comedy side of things as was Blankfield as the blind 'Blinkin'...sounds utterly cringeworthy I know but it does work. It was only Rees as the Sheriff of Rottingham (*groan*) that seemed to swing and miss for me, clearly trying way too hard to hammer those funny lines in. Same could be said for Tracy Ullman as the witch who didn't even really need to be there.As I'm sure everybody knows by now a film like this is all about the delivery, the comedic performances of the actors, if that aspect is nailed then the film is reasonably secured. Its not about the effects or sets or costumes...although its nice if they look good but end of the day its whether you can laugh with the film and not at it for being crap. Personally I think this movie just about makes the grade, its earned somewhat of a cult status over time and I can see why. There is a lot of embarrassing crud in here this is true (Dave Chappelle), some visual gags are terribly simple bordering on downright infantile whilst some of the visuals are very basic. But (and its a biggish but) there is also just enough solid cheeky clever lampoonery and dialog along with performances to make you smile. Although it doesn't have the overall sheen of Brooks follow up vampire flick.

Jason M (ru) wrote: I watched this as I thought it was a Monty Python film that I had never seen. It is closely related as Terry Gilliam's first foray as a director and includes Michael Palin as the protagonist. This film does not really go anywhere and evokes no interest from the viewer. I'm surprised this was released.

Gergely K (au) wrote: Hamistatlan amerikai melodrma, a legjobbak kz 1/4l. Mervyn LeRoy magabiztos (C)s precz rendez (C)ssel vezeti v (C)gig n (C)z'it a balerina (C)s katona szerelme tragikus klvrijn. A v (C)gletekig fokozott romantikus hangulatot, szvmelenget' humorral (C)s izgalmas prbesz (C)dekkel telesz've teszik egy (C)letre eml (C)kezetess (C). Vivien Leigh tekintete, a trt (C)net el'rehaladtval annyi fjdalommal (C)s szomorsggal telik meg, hogy a v (C)g (C)n mr szinte svrogtam feloldozs (C)rt. Kedvenc.

Allie L (ca) wrote: No, Richard Gere! No!

Brian M (it) wrote: Good, but a lil dragged out

Waleed A (it) wrote: awesome movie, action is a step up from the first one but the story is weaker (about 4 viewings)