Two of a Kind
Brandy Kirby (Lizabeth Scott ) and crooked Lawyer Vincent Mailer (Alexander Knox) plan to rob William (Griff Barnett) and Maida McIntyre (Virginia Brissac) by producing a convincing double for their long-lost son. Brandy charms gambler Lefty Farrell (Edmond O'Brien) into impersonating the missing son.
- Stars:Edmond O'Brien, Lizabeth Scott, Terry Moore, Alexander Knox, Griff Barnett, Robert Anderson, Virginia Brissac,
- Director:Henry Levin,
- Writer:Lawrence Kimble (screen play), James Gunn (screen play), James Edward Grant (from a story by)
Brandy Kirby and crooked Lawyer Vincent Mailer plan to rob William and Maida McIntyre by producing a convincing double for their long-lost son. Brandy charms gambler Lefty Farrell into ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Two of a Kind torrent reviews
(us) wrote: everyone wants to see this
(br) wrote: A decent comedy nothing special which sucks because it had potential to be memorable but this is pure mindless fun It wasn't awful but wasn't anything great either I will give the film credit for one thing a perfect run time otherwise pure mindless fun worth seeing once Grade C+
(au) wrote: I think it's safe to say that this is the worst movie I think I have ever seen. I think this movie is a step down from Black Water because much like Black Water, Bear is all talk and no action. Honestly, how can you build up a single bear to be a main conflict in a story. Some of the events that happened are just laughable because there is no way that some of these things can happen. This was a complete waste of an hour and a half so I strongly advise all viewers not to see it. The best acting out of the entire movie was probably the bear and that is not a compliment toward anyone.
(br) wrote: It wasn't quite as good as I was expecting but I enjoyed it nonetheless.
(gb) wrote: A monotonous and repetitive story, unsympathetic characters, awkward and unrealistic dialogue, delivered by actors with no sense of timing or expression, poorly edited and sprayed with the a single angsty guitar twang music loop which does nothing to add drama to this horrible film. The story can be summarised in a single line of dialogue: "He's dying. I'm wanking. It's a mess." A skilled actor might make something out of this unnatural utterance, but Faithfull delivered it so flatly it made me squirm. We couldn't make it to the end, and I regret wasting two euros and an hour of my life on it. I guess a vaguely naughty plot appealed to puerile audiences in Berlin, and American audiences swallowed it as an arty European indie flick. It isn't - it is artless nonsense.
(mx) wrote: I really loved this movie. I'm surprised it wasn't released in theatres.
(au) wrote: Starts good and it gets interesting, but the ending was like whatever... Re-write on this one was needed!
(kr) wrote: Wow! A very gut wrenching film and true story!!! Definitely a film everyone should see! Don't waste your time on Hollywood garbage films, go rent THIS! It puts guerrilla warfare in perspective when you see the consequences of people fighting with children in the cross-hairs. Using young boys from the local villages to supply the front lines just makes your heart ache for them.
(jp) wrote: If you have ever wondered what desert motorcycle racing is, this movie is great! I am heading to go race this race in two weeks because I saw this movie. It is one of my favorite movies of all time. Although there are some discrepencies with it, it is accurate on most levels. I know this may be a spoiler...but what Johnny Campbell did was not technically cheating according to SCORE's rules at the time. I know this from personal experience.
(ag) wrote: Thats a remake of the movie The Longest Yard.However its really worse that the original-as most remakes are.I had some fun watching this but thats about it.Well what else can i say.All these movies (light comedies) dont have good acting so that wasnt a suprise.The direction was fine.Im giving it 55-60% cause of its mainly lame jokes.You might say "Well 55% because some jokes werent good?"Well yeah.Its a comedy and if a comedy isnt funny then something is wrong with it.
(es) wrote: Amazing, epic ending shot. Pretty similar to the movies about Genghis Khan released in 2007, just takes place 500+ years later, so there are cannons and a fortress.
(de) wrote: adam garcia is a g simplement!
(mx) wrote: Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers is a terrible terrible film... full of fake blood, lame dialogue, terrible acting, nudity, chainsaws, and a plot that almost makes Ed Wood look good... and that's why I like it!There's a reason this film is such a draw for lovers of SOBIG movies and it isn't just the name (though it does help). Any film the combines sleaze with horror and sports a story about an ancient Egyptian cult that uses chainsaws to perform sacrifices all while an old school gumshoe (Private Detective) complete with voice overs, tries to figure out who's killing all these people, truly deserves checking out.
(nl) wrote: An Interesting look at a Young Arnold and Lou Ferrigno make Pumping Iron look good and sexy
(us) wrote: tellement moins bien qu'Hatari de Howard Hawks.
(br) wrote: A few select scientists are working on a top-secret project to make a human invisible and more problematically, restore visibility. The story shows reasonable construction and a clear concept in the first part of the movie. It lays good groundwork and effectively foreshadows complications where the animal test subjects become highly aggressive and violent in the invisible state. The main characters and their relationships are adequately established. This in large part is due to Kevin Bacon and Elizabeth Shue overachieving with the simple material they have to work with. There are also stunning special effects throughout the movie. The transition scenes where subjects become invisible or regain visibility are very impressive. Additionally, the movie does a fantastic job of helping the audience keep track of an unseen man, with surface paint, body sensors, swimming in water, sprinklers, footprints and more. Unfortunately, the good subtly early on goes to waste as it devolves into a formulaic slasher movie. It is a better than average slasher, but it is still subject to many of the typical clichs for movies like this. I, however, do give it credit for a character-driven story, rather than having a glut of insufferable nitwits who "need to die." Still, I ask for the same tension and subtly in the climax and action as the buildup.
(br) wrote: DMX is the gimmick and the film is a waste.