Three women who are complete strangers to each other inherit a house from a woman none of them know. They meet to try to understand how fate has brought them together. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
You may also like
Tysta leken torrent reviews
Zahid C (ca) wrote: Day: ThursdayDate: 7 Feb 2013Time: 10.00 pmWith: No oneOn: Laptop
Leslie W (ca) wrote: This movie scare the begee gees out of me!
Tammi D (au) wrote: CRAP. Pure and simple CRAP.
Bill T (mx) wrote: Enjoyable enough trifle that has the lady archaelogist on the hunt for some doodads that can make you control time. Of course, bad guys are after her too. The Raiderseque action sequences are what makes this one.
Tim G (gb) wrote: I don't know, I just don't get it. Slow, boring, cheap looking...... wooden acting, cheesy dialogue, absurd plot turns. I just couldn't get in to it.
Anders A (de) wrote: One monumental fuck of an action movie! Do compromise at some extend with cheesyness and family humor, but all in all pretty solid in the grand scale.
Mary B (br) wrote: I think I would pay up to $50 for an early Mike Leigh film on DVD with subtitles and lexicon of British underclass to compliment my American stupidity (same goes for the Belfast dialect in Four Days in July). This is Leigh's least stylized, therefore most uber-realistic film. Roth (in an incredibly bright portrayal of dimness) and Oldman (brilliant casting) make their film debut and Molina and Phil Daniels steal the show.
CHARLIE (it) wrote: GOOD MOVIE WORTH WATCHING
Brother G (mx) wrote: One of my all time favorite Laurel and Hardy films, this film is classic, from beginning to end. It has great comedy because it has the right ingredients-Laurel and Hardy, a beautiful woman, The French Foreign Legion, an airplane (flown by Laurel and Hardy as well as crashed by them) and, well, you get the picture. A must see for all you people stuck in the present.
Scott G (ag) wrote: A great fantasy film. Although not on my top ten but on top twenty. Sean Connery was great and Dennis Quaid did well as well. The CGI hasn't age too well but it still a great film. It didn't need any sequels because it worked just fine as a stand alone film. This deserved better reception from both critics and audiences and definitely should've made more at the box office.
Darrin C (us) wrote: Very bad movie. Ridiculous plot, ridiculous acting, ridiculous shots: just a horribly ridiculous movie. It's not even about frogs. It shows LOTS of close-up frogs breathing and jumping (being thrown). Otherwise, there are extremely bad death scenes committed by spiders, lizards, snakes, even gators. Frogs finally somehow kill at the very end, but how is never explained.
Luke B (mx) wrote: Good conclusion to the series. Confusing ending
Shantel D (gb) wrote: I may be the only one, but I really like this movie! I was even surprised and that rarely happens.
Marcella S (br) wrote: It wasn't that spectacular. Very much drawn upon sense and sensibility and pride and prejudice. Anne Hathaway was decent, as was James Macavoy. Not a super memorable film really.