Uma Pantera em Minha Cama

Uma Pantera em Minha Cama

Womanizing dentist takes his wife for a vacation in Petrópolis, Brazil. In their hotel, a woman dressed in white visits the room of a different man each night, causing trouble.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:95 minutes
  • Release:1971
  • Language:Portuguese
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:based on play,  

Womanizing dentist takes his wife for a vacation in Petrópolis, Brazil. In their hotel, a woman dressed in white visits the room of a different man each night, causing trouble. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Uma Pantera em Minha Cama torrent reviews

Daniela M (au) wrote: this movie is missing what the first one had:excitement. The thrill of Anastasia and Christian meeting. Anastasia trying out Christians ways. Not knowing what to expect of him.This one feels more of a movie about a girl who has an unhealthy relationship with a rich guy and well,thats the only thing. No plot here really. Easily could be a lifetime movie (with censorship of course).Pretty locations though.

Rohan T (fr) wrote: The sequel doesn't learn from it's predecessor. With a promising concept and treatment, the film drags through and the last 30-40 mins of unneeded emotional drama helps the film to stray away from it's overall impact.Considering it's election season and the movie is based on elections, the tale of fiction undesirably becomes too real for itself to handle. All in all with legends on screen, the performances are fabulous yet it's just decent enough for a one time watch nonetheless.

Utkarsh S (au) wrote: You Cannot just hate this movie.. It is india's finest film ever made..

Mark N (es) wrote: So my friends see this DVD, right, in our local shop. They see the title: "Dragon". The blurb at the top reads: "The Action of 'Reign Of Fire'. The Adventure of 'Lord OF The Rings'." They seem suitably impressed by it, so bring it round to the larger gathering of us. We sit down and start to watch. I'm not sure if I'm glad that we did or wish that we hadn't. Putting it very bluntly, this is a bad, bad, bad, bad, bad, bad, bad, BAD film. It starts off okay - you get suitably epic scenery shots of great mountains, an ominous female narrator talking of a great battle, setting the scene. And then comes the first shot of CGI and you just know that from then on in the film is just going to get worse and worse. The acting is almost abysmal. Almost, because it is semi-saved by an actually okay performance from Eliza Swenson, with big scary eyes as the witch who created the mythical title beast. Trouble is, my opinion of her is brought down heavily by the fact that she wrote the story. The script is very bad indeed, with very bad dialogue been spouted from mouths with accents that take more dips than a roller-coaster. The action scenes, the few that there are, are either badly choreographed or full of the worst CGI this side of "Tron". Even the earliest forms of CGI in films is better than the effects in this. The dragon itself is never really fully seen, so there's no sense of menace or...actually, I don't think there's any sense of anything! Some may argue that it's SUPPOSED to be this bad, that it's SUPPOSED to look amateurish. But the major problem with this argument is that the film, at the end of the day, is just incredibly boring. The dialogue scenes are long and slow, and you just feel your eyes drooping, even if you're not tired. If it WAS meant to all be a laugh, it would be less boring, it would be more apparent. So basically, I hated this film. It's a film that makes you laugh for just sooooo many reasons. It's a very bad film and please, please, PLEASE, unless you like personal torture, please do not subject yourself to its pure awfulness. 1/10

Rajat P (nl) wrote: one star extra for goa n gokarna!

Very S (mx) wrote: One of the worst horror movies ever made. The actors are awful, the plot is just not there and it doesn't have any sense. There are no scary moments at all the the whole movie is an insult to our intelligence.Do your self a favor and avoid it by any means.

jay n (ca) wrote: Sissy and Troy are good but the screenplay is rather scattered not leaving them with much to work with although they do have one good emotional scene.

Mike K (fr) wrote: Mediocre revenger wth Forster turning to his own brand of justice. C+

Ben S (kr) wrote: A Pure gem if there ever was one

bill s (br) wrote: Jackson raises up the rather generic sports movie to watchable with his strong performance.

Mason M (fr) wrote: Not exactly everything I'd look for in a typical Godzilla movie, but a decent story and awesome design!