When a Christmas Eve blizzard shuts down the airport, five stranded youths take the opportunity to spend the night running wild, having some fun, and finding among themselves a new kind of family. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki
Five disparate kids snowed in at the airport on Christmas Eve learn some lessons about friendship when they launch a bid to get back to their families and outsmart a disgruntled airport official who wants to keep them grounded.
You may also like
Unaccompanied Minors torrent reviews
Denise P (es) wrote: Although the subject matter is undeniably dry and stuffy, Admission is nevertheless a heartfelt, light and sincere comedy that beautifully emphasizes the unpredictable messiness of work, parenting and motherhood -- and is bolstered by brilliantly charming performances from Tina Fey and Paul Rudd.
Dylan S (fr) wrote: "Blow" is a very interesting movie full of FANTASTIC PERFORMANCES from everyone, especially Johnny Depp who puts in one of the best performances of his entire career. While yes it does get a bit sentimental near the end, it's not all too glaring or distracting. In fact, the one thing in this movie I actually DID find distracting was Ray Liotta's silver hair as he gets older, I don't know why that caught my attention so well, but it did. All of the supporting actors/actresses did great jobs with their roles and performances (standouts being Paul Reubens as Derek , and Jordi Molla as Diego) all of which came together to basically carry the movie along whenever it starts to struggle. Also, it was kinda cool seeing Emma Roberts when she was just starting her career as an actor; everyone's gotta start somewhere kid.
Harry W (gb) wrote: With Kevin Smith taking on an all new genre, Dogma sounded like a hilarious romp. Serving as one of Kevin Smith's more largely budgeted films, Dogma serves as a chance for him to explore a more high concept plot than the more simple ones he has explored in the past. Apparently, Kevin Smith's idea of a big budget film is one about angels and demons packed with pop culture references and strange religious jokes. A simplified explanation of the film would be that it is completely out there, and in a good way. The one problem with Dogma is the fact that there are so many characters. Dogma is full of hilarious characters with some supporting ones who are present to ensure the story moves forward which completely makes sense. But there are so many of them who are very essential to the story in various ways, meaning that there is a lot to keep up with. Usually a large amount of characters can be pulled off in a Kevin Smith film, but this time there is more focus on plot than on characters or script and many of the characters play very essential parts in the story which means that a lot is happening. It isn't too much to keep up with, but the amount of characters in the film coupled with all of the language referring to multiple complicated concepts of religious mythology can make the feature overwhelming in some areas. All in all, Dogma is a very narrative oriented film which doesn't necessarily work to Kevin Smith's expertise because he can only control so much of it and I found myself walking away from the film confused about a couple of major plot points. Luckily enough Kevin Smith's iconic brand of humour is more than enough to carry Dogma to the end and ensure that it remains a good film even if it remains scattered in parts.The film's exploration of religious mythology is very intriguing. Exploring legitimate religious concepts and characters as well as original ones crafted by Kevin Smith, Dogma uses the platform of religion as the source of many clever plot dynamics and even though things can get somewhat confusing occasionally, the general view of religion's relevance to the contemporary age as well as the sight of religious characters brought into modern day life is clever. Kevin Smith may not his every mark with Dogma, but he hits more than enough to ensure that it turns out a clever new step for the writer-director-actor for experimenting with combining his brand of material with fresh subject matter. All in all, the film is more than funny enough and very easy to watch which means that it should easily deliver justice to Kevin Smith's fanbase.The thing which really makes Dogma entertaining is the way that the cast work with the material so well.Once again, Ben Affleck proves that he can pull out his best acting talents when working with either Kevin Smith or Matt Damon. His performance is one which is full of energy, but more impressively he shows off a complete understanding of all the complicated religious concepts. He delivers all of his lines with ease without a single stutter, and he never comes off as melodramatic or short on charisma. Ben Affleck must really have a knack for working with Kevin Smith because he is able to work a lot of life out of the casual nature of the material, as well as the fact that the chemistry he shares with Matt Damon is easy and pretty funny. Matt Damon does a nice job as well. He brings a familiar persona to the role, but considering the comic twist of the film it is an interesting opportunity to see him taking on alternative material. Matt Damon proves his comic value in Dogma because of how he conveys a comic sense of internal conflict in approaching the situations. The gimmick of seeing him teamed up with Ben Affleck proves entertaining, and Matt Damon is able to hold his own even if he may not stand out as actively as many of the other cast members. Chris Rock is interesting to see in Dogma. As he has proven in standup and countless films, Chris Rock has his own iconic hilarious charismatic style. So seeing that combined with a Kevin Smith script is a really interesting thing to behold. Combining Kevin Smith's hilarious strength at crafting a screenplay and Chris Rock's energetic comedy style, Rufus, the thirteenth apostle becomes a hilarious addition to the collection of characters in Dogma. Chris Rock says every word of the script with energetic confidence and passion for getting the character right, so he makes a grand addition to the collection of characters. Alan Rickman is a perfect casting decision for the role of Metatron. Playing on his status as an actor who frequently play villainous characters well, seeing him take on the heroic but still dark role in Dogma is a strong fit for him. Yet the surprise comes from the fact that he essentially parodies himself and goes for a crude edge of humour which he is flawless at. Alan Rickman is hilarious in Dogma in such an unconventional role for him, and it presents a creative step forward for his career by displaying his potential in comedic material.Linda Fiorentino is good, Salma Hayek is sexy and sharp with her line delivery and the supporting role of George Carlin is just utterly hilarious because he is always on par with energy flowing over the top. Considering the comic potential of his character, George Carlin really steals the show whenever he is on screen. And as always, the cameos of Jay and Silent Bob are a hilarious element, particularly considering the fact that the context of their cameos is so utterly ridiculous this time around that it cannot help but be hilarious. Jason Mewes manages to keep the energy alive in these scenes by saying everything with hilarious overconfidence and without second thought while Kevin Smith maintains a lot of questionable facial expressions. The two of them make a strong duo once again in Dogma, and their presence is a wonderful treat for fans of Kevin Smith films and the View Askewniverse, and it is great that they get a lot more screen time this time around.So although Dogma is uneven in terms of story, Kevin Smith's material is fresh and the cast never have a dull moment.
lex V (it) wrote: Si tienes claro que la piloto negra es la que va a morir, es que poca cosa hay ms all de los estereotipos. Bueno, las batallas espaciales, y ni eso.
Andy S (ca) wrote: Film was alright for a Zombie movie and there was some good gorey scenes....though must admit the Zombie head flying out the fridge did scare the hell out of me...lmao!
jon m (ag) wrote: Descent comedy. Great moral story where u think the woman u desire is who u want ends up being the one u never were thinking of.
Brett C (nl) wrote: Review In A Nutshell:Breathless has been pressured on me for quite some time now. My best friend, who had to see this for one of his film-related classes, has asked me a couple of times on whether or not I have yet seen the film? The main reason why I am seeing this film for the first time now, is that I was waiting for a local Blu-Ray release and patiently hoping its price would drop to a more affordable and reasonable level. I have always been intimidated with this film, as with every prestigious list I find, this film seems to be always present in the higher rankings. But at the same time, I have been able to stumble upon some nay-sayers and stating the negative qualities of this film, which certainly helped in keeping my expectations in neutral. Now that I have seen the film, does it reach the level that many claim it to be? Personally, no, but it does deliver enough to keep me satisfied.The first thing that came to my mind when going through this film is how similar it is to an early Quentin Tarantino film. It delivers a plot that physically drives its characters but the film's core is found elsewhere. It is due to the film's characters and the style that the director, Jean-Luc Godard, employs to shape them, that I was able to keep myself entertained. Also, similar to a Tarantino film, it takes more than one sitting to fully appreciate or have a solid opinion on the film, as it doesn't spoon-feed the audience, and relies on patience and thorough observation from the viewer. From this initial viewing, I was able to appreciate the complex and complicated relationship between the two protagonists. Godard established the characters and their relationships in the first act, and therefore hooks the audience in and hungry for more information in order to understand these individuals.As expected from a film in the French New Wave, Breathless was entirely shot on location. Godard has captured that sense of authenticity in its setting, allowing the audience to be totally immersed and believe that what is being seen and the characters we are watching are truth rather than fiction. Godard's style is certainly different from what Truffaut delivered in The 400 Blows, as Truffaut used his location to create atmosphere and mood, while also reflecting the feelings of the protagonist. If there was one thing about the film's photography I could praise, its ability to capture long takes and allowing the camera to constantly follow its subjects, while also allowing the actors have a sense of freedom and space in their performance; they are not restricted to a tightly constructed set like in Hollywood films, even the interior settings in this film are captured in such a way that creates a feeling of openness and reality that it had me feeling like a third person in the room. The film also featured a brilliant method in editing that ensured the film's length to be cramped onto 90 minutes but also maintaining the flow of the film, ensuring that the audience won't feel disorientated; Godard uses jump cuts to remove small sections of the one long take, jumping from the actor's line to the next.Breathless features a score that incorporates elements of Jazz to give the film a stylistic flair. The music plays a big role in shaping the film's tone and the character, because of the film's music, I was able to see the protagonist as a cool and slick individual rather than the scum he truly is. It allowed me to feel empathetic for the man and his goals. The music has also changed my perspective of Paris, letting me see the city in a whole different light; now, I am able to see the city also as this groovy and down to earth place, rather than just the pretentious and emotionally heavy perspective that I have always affiliated with.Jean-Paul Belmondo and Jean Seberg's chemistry in this film is wonderful. I could watch and listen both of them exchange dialogue for hours, as they bring so much charm in their performances that one can't help but feel attached to them. They don't attempt to deliver so much from their performances, as Godard wants them to display simplicity to show that they are authentic figures and he understands that showing less would speak more for the characters and allows the audience to be more than just distant and careless spectators but rather be engaged and empathetic viewers.This is definitely not the final time I would be writing about Breathless, as I intend to come back, learn and understand everything about the film. It may not have captivated me, the same way that The 400 Blows did, but Breathless has planted its seed and I am just waiting for it to grow and produce fruits for me to feast on.
Greg W (de) wrote: good technicolour historical pic