Stream in HD   Download in HD


Uncle Buck

Uncle Buck

As an idle, good-natured bachelor, Uncle Buck is the last person you would think of to watch the kids. However, during a family crisis, he is suddenly left in charge of his nephew and nieces. Unaccustomed to suburban life, fun-loving Uncle Buck soon charms his younger relatives Miles and Maizy with his hefty cooking and his new way of doing the laundry. His carefree style does not impress everyone though - especially his rebellious teenage niece, Tia, and his impatient girlfriend, Chanice. With a little bit of luck and a lot of love, Uncle Buck manages to surprise everyone in this heartwarming family comedy.

Uncle Buck has a reputation for being unreliable and a bit of a house wrecker. It is therefore with reluctance, his sister-in-law agrees to leave Buck looking after the kids - two harmless youngsters and a rebelious teenager when she visits her sick father. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Uncle Buck720p6834758.2 MB

Uncle Buck torrent reviews

Rea K (it) wrote: Not as powerful as his previous work "Maria full of grace"

William C (us) wrote: Thanks to movies likes "Paranormal Activity," ghost and haunted house movies are making a comeback. You could say what "Scream" did for slasher movies, "Paranormal Activity" does for haunted house movies, and within the stream of terrifying and top-notch haunted houses movies to emerge is "Greystone Park." Filmed in a sort of mockumentary style or pseudo-documentary form, the movie stars Sean Stone, son of Oliver Stone of "JFK." Sean meets Alex Wraith, an urban explorer at one of his father's dinner parties and hears about paranormal encounters Alex has had visiting abandoned mental hospitals, of which there are a lot on this country. Along for the trip is Antonella Lentini, a "hauntingly" attractive student from NYC University with a similar interest in insane asylums, and they travel out to explore the abandoned and derelict Greystone Park Mental Hospital in New Jersey for a short film. The best part of the movie is that the location is the real star of the movie. Pieced together from footage shot at Letchworth Village, Creedmore Asylum and Linda Vista Hospital, the setting floats between uneven states of neglect from being completely decimated and ruined to almost preserved as they wander the location looking for activity, getting scared by shadows, unnerved by props and settings or just scaring each other a long the way. Some of what they encounter are shadows set aside for just the audience to see to establish the notion that maybe the ghosts aren't real, and maybe someone else could be in the location trying to scare them. However, a few weak spots come up here and there. One, while the movie is both terrifying and psychological, the conversations of the trio border on the inane as they over-theorize and debate on why ghosts exist and why people are drawn to visiting these locations. Another problem with the movie are the intense blackouts and camera problems that occur throughout. After a while, they get kind of a little annoying. It is hard enough the travel through the setting with the characters without having to also experience their hallucinations and breakdowns with them, especially since the movie frequently goes pitch black and completely unlit at times. At one time or another, each of the main characters gets "possessed" and zones out without any memories of what they did while they were in character. The location alone even dressed up with the odd props and disturbing mutilated dolls is disturbing enough without having to endure the several glimpses of images compressed down to under two seconds. Another problem I have is there are two many sub-plots with the discussions of Billy Lasher as one of the ghosts, the talks of someone else being in the location, whether or not Alex is trying to scare them, the worries of devil worshippers on the site, the struggles with being lost inside the structure (Alex always claims to know where he is, but he never does) and every other thought that gets passed around in the movie. Bottom line: it's an excellent movie with an intense location, but the "Twilight Zone" ending where it ends up doesn't measure up with the rest of the film or the journey it took getting there.

Mindy C (au) wrote: it is really good if you have see the first Riddick

Laura G (ru) wrote: Oh man, this is the best first 10 minutes of a B horror movie ever. I mean, the first line is literally, "Professor, this is the last box from the Indian burial site." What more could you ask for? Oh wait, nm, [I]Killer Jellyfish[/I] is concurrently airing on Animal Planet.

Josas G (mx) wrote: Esa escena en donde el top que usa se transforma en minifalda blow my mind

Michael M (jp) wrote: This is a very fine film. It doesn't quite feel finished when you come to the end, and for years now I've wondered why that is, but it's a beautifully acted, filmed and designed film, with a moving situation at the heart of it. Peter Mullan makes a fine Mayor of Casterbridge, the Hardy novel this story was adapted from.

Kevin M W (mx) wrote: Great cast wasted on a manipulative piece of sci-fi drivel. So many plot holes ... ! So you stay to watch the cast, but eventually hate being jerked around alla time, and the lame-o explanations for it. And the ending? A hot turd in your living room.

Matt G (de) wrote: Other than maybe Cage, no one overacts with more shear entertainment value than Paxton. And while this has some fun misunderstandings / miscommunications, it's largely just a nobly stylized but super ridiculous chamber crime-drama with almost no memorable purpose.

Amethyst v (ru) wrote: Slow, but sad ending

Allan C (es) wrote: Probably the most lurid of all Alfred Hitchcock films. And I'll assume that everyone reading this knows the story and I won't bother summarizing the story or worry about spoilers. But there's always an undercurrent of sex and violence in his films, but he really pushed the limit with the one and audiences loved it. The studio hated Hitchcock's idea to doing a gruesome story based on real-life serial killer Ed Gein, so they slashed his budget in hopes that he'd drop the project, but Hitch went ahead and made the film with his "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" TV crew on the Universal backlot and the rest is history. My other favorite bit of film history with "Psycho" is that Anthony Perkins was basically a teen heartthrob before making this film, starting as the romanic lead opposite Audrey Hepburn, Sophia Loren, Shirley MacLaine, or Jane Fonda. Perkins gave such a great performance as Norman Bates that no one could ever take him as anything but a deranged killer and ended up typecasting him for the rest of his career. Though not to diminish Perkins contribution to the film, director Hitchcock is at the hight of his powers in terms of manipulating the audience. On the story level, Hickcock manages to keep the audience thinking that Norman Bates' mother is responsible for all these killings without doing any cheats and even after the audience knows the film's big reveal, a second viewing of the film becomes laced with wickedly dark humor that goes unnoticed the first time around. In therms of use of the camera and editing, Hitchcock again demonstrates his mastery of the medium. The iconic shower sequence is what this film is most remembered for and it still today is incredibly brutal and jarring. I think it's Marion Crane's naked vulnerability that makes the scene so frightening, along with, of course, the music and sound editing. Hitch's shot choice and precise editing is so much more effective compared to a majority of the sloppy murder scenes you get in most contemporary films. And the scenes that directly follow the murder, where Norman Bates cleans up the mess left behind by Mother is quite a gruesome affair in itself with all it lurid little details . There are plenty of films before and since where someone has cleaned up a murder scene to hide the crime, but Hitchcock gets devilish glee in lingering on Norman picking up Marion's shoes and wrinkled note papers and those sorts of details make the scene go on excruciatingly (in a good way) forever. And that slight moment the car being dumped in the swam with Marion's body stops sinking, is just terrific suspense (not to mention that Hitch has you worrying about Norman). But speaking of Bernard Herrmann's music, beside the i conic murder music, the entire score is amazing, particularly the second half of the film when the story shifts from Marion Crane to Norman Bates. Herrmann's use of only strings to compliment the black and white photography plays brilliantly as a stripped down compliment the film's overall stark nature. I've always felt this was the closest to a horror film that Hitchcock ever got, with a brief tease toward the supernatural when Vera Miles and Marion's boyfriend find out that Norman's mom has been dead for years. Overall, this film is a real classic that I think would still engage modern audiences.

Ruben M (fr) wrote: I give it one star cause katherine heigle is hot. This is probably one of the worst movies I have ever attempted to see. I literally could not watch this thing. I downloaded it by accident, I was actually trying to get two for the money with Al Pacino, which is an awesome movie. I just wonder how much she got paid for this, and did she expect it to suck so badly, did she even care? So boring, and unfunny. It's not even that sexy of a movie. Total crap.

Paul R (es) wrote: I will forgive all its negative traits for just one more giggle or smile from the lovely Patricia Arquette.

Michael M (it) wrote: Another movie that has some high points (some pretty fantastic not entirely CGI action scenes) and it's low points (Vin Diesel's "acting") but all in all it's worth another watch if you haven't scene it since '02.

Chris C (kr) wrote: Powerfully moving and tensely driven, Shattered is a riveting thriller that depicts every parent's worst nightmare and showcases a dark, villainous performance from Pierce Brosnan and terrific performances from Gerard Butler and Maria Bello.