Upstairs

Upstairs

Grace Stearn left in debt after he father's death, rents a room to a stranger named Ward Weaver, not knowing that he is a murderous psychopath.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:88 minutes
  • Release:2009
  • Language:English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:Upstairs 2009 full movies, Upstairs torrents movie

Grace Stearn left in debt after her father's death, rents a room to a stranger named Ward Weaver, not knowing that he is a murderous psychopath. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Upstairs torrent reviews

David D (it) wrote: I loved all the "how we met & fell in love" bits from the couples during the film.

Arnaud L (us) wrote: Great work from Dante Lam, probably his best film so far. Impressive action sequences and powerful dramatic scenes. All the cast deliver very good performances.

Neeraj D (ag) wrote: Gr8 movie especially when you are an Indian! :) loved it!

Timothy K (fr) wrote: Entertaining and goofy, 'Made' provides a showcase for quirky chemistry.

John B (ru) wrote: It's definitely best to watch this at one of Crispin's live shows so that he is there to explain his intent in making the film. That aspect itself, gives the film an extra star, because my initial reaction was just 1-star. I really didn't like it, and/because I really didn't get it. Maybe I was just too tired and need to give it another chance when I'm more alert; however, whatever the case may be, I appreciate and respect his intent.

Nicolas M (nl) wrote: Demasiado obvia, simplona y plana. A veces es estpido tratar de hacer una historia sentimental cuando es imposible sentir afecto por cualquier absurdo personaje.

Hannah C (ru) wrote: Slow and boring, in my opinion. The only thing I liked was the wisdom of Mr. Bagheri. Although the plot idea is intriguing. I'd like to see a remake someday.

Aswin W (es) wrote: good movie. The storyline was not bad it had some sad moments and funny. Also the acting was good to and worth watching.

William C (ru) wrote: Grade:High 3/10Pathfinder is an action film that although has some well choreographedfight scenes, never does much better than that, and also the onlyreason I didn't rate it lower. With poor acting to contribute to thealready negative sounding movie, you can't help feel whilst watching"who ever thought this or that was a good idea". At least it was ashort movie, probably one more reason it isn't nauseatingly bad, I feltit was just about a bad movie, and here below is why so.The story is one that isn't always seen, but nevertheless is stillplayed out very badly and never gets to the point I feel it wanted toreach. I did enjoy(slightly) some of the action scenes scatteredaround, mostly in the middle it has to be said, and they can actuallymake you want to keep looking at the screen. It could have been betterif it had put in more action, it may sound like a terrible formula buteven over the top fighting would probably have saved this movie just alittle bit.Karl Urban is not the worst actor, and been in some blockbustersbefore, but here he seems out of place and very still like, almost asif they cast George of the jungle to be the main character. RussellMeans as the Pathfinder is really quite good and is probably the onlyactor in this that puts in a serious display, sadly he is wasted inmost of his scenes. Any chemistry the makers wanted never comes tofruition either, even when people are angry at one another they stillseem to be good friends for some strange reason.The directing is pretty bad but not the worst thing seen here, somescenes at the end and of course any action is well done and so thedirector isn't all at fault. The writing is bad to say the least, justnot one piece of dialogue seems to be any thing other than basic, thething is some parts are set up quite well just to be wasted by thescript involved. Special Effects are unneeded but used, instead ofbuilding sets which are pretty simple they decided to digitally docertain things, which make the film look very cheap but also ruin whatcould have been decent parts.I said before about the action, not too bad and well done in most partswhen not ruined by effects or acting. One thing that is well done arethe grim scenes, any part which is meant to be a dark and horrible bitis actually done quite well and you can at time feel genuinely bad forthe people on the wrong end of the scenes. Other than those points andRussell Means acting, not much more positivity to give I'm afraid.If you want to see an action filled film, and don't care about thescript, directing and acting, then this could be for you for sure. Ifyou also like blood and guts, I guess partly this could be for you too,not so much guts but very bloody when in fighting. If you want to see awell worked drama piece then stay away, this is possibly a greatdefinition of bad drama, working with over used fighting.Overall I give this a high kind of 3/10 ,it is just about a Pretty Terrible movie andone that so nearly is just "Bad". As said It isn't long and so it meansyou aren't too annoyed you wasted your time viewing it by the end,although you may have a few choice words by the time it is finished. Imust stress there are worse movies out there so don't think this willmake you puke in disgust, well maybe you will a little.

Jouni K (au) wrote: It's a classic Richard Pryor Movie. Kind of complicated but funny.

Steve S (jp) wrote: Ominous period piece about the corporate life. Well acted.