Vajont - La diga del disonore

Vajont - La diga del disonore

On October 9th, 1963, at 10:39 pm, 260 million cubic meters of rock fell down from Mount Toc to the artificial lake formed by the Vajont dam, the higher dam in the world. The landslide formed a 250-meters wave and 50 million cubic meters of water completely destroied all the below towns, killing more than 2000 people. Planned by engineer Semenza, Vajont dam (263 meters) had to carry the electricity in all the houses of the country. Tina Merlin, a journalist from 'L'Unitá', tried for years to denounce the danger to build a dam near the Mount Toc and expecially to denounce all the omissions by the corrupted politicians and workers in charge of the dam construction. They preferred to trust in old geologist Dal Piaz instead to hear engineer Semenza young son's alarming analysis. No one seemed to understand the high danger until that October fatal night.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:116 minutes
  • Release:2001
  • Language:Italian,French
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:water,   cemetery,   dam,  

On October 9th, 1963, at 10:39 pm, 260 million cubic meters of rock fell down from Mount Toc to the artificial lake formed by the Vajont dam, the higher dam in the world. The landslide ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Vajont - La diga del disonore torrent reviews

James B (br) wrote: if you ever wondered why a restaurant named McDonalds had a Founder named Ray Kroc, this movie we'll sort of answer that question. What it does more than that though is give you a little bit of insight into what might appear on the outside looking in as a very black-and-white situation but is in reality filled with quite a bit of gray areas. solid performances by the entire cast and as near as I can tell fairly accurate as far as props and authenticity.

Kendal K (nl) wrote: if you make it through this movie you must be part demi god

Michael O (ag) wrote: It's good to see Cahiers filmmakers still making films like Cahiers filmmakers. Honor isn't the successor of New Wave filmmaking but I give him kudos for not using the techniques and flavour of the sixties wrongly. Instead of successor he is pushing to the idea of free love and emotion, of ecstatic style, to return to the cinema. Successor implies homage too often. Homage was the idea of cinema to begin with. So instead let's say he's doing his own thing and doing it beautifully.

Johannes J (gb) wrote: Arti med rockebioer, selv om jeg ikke er noen stor Stones-fan. Men det har jo ingen betydning for kvaliteten p filmen. Syntes det var en god fortelling, som fanga perioden p en strlende mte. Viste ikke at Brian Jones ble drept, og jeg viste heller ikke mye om han, s filmen falt inn under kategorien "underholdende og interessant" i hodet mitt. Om folk som kjenner historien bedre vil klage p den s g ett hode.

Anna B (br) wrote: Another bad lesbian film. I can see what Himmel was going for (languid, naturalistic, melancholy), but sheer technical ineptitude proves to be her undoing. Maybe if it wasn't so ugly, didn't sound so awful, maybe if the editing wasn't so lacklustre and the actors so terrible. Yeah maybe then you'd have a movie I could watch.

Jed D (de) wrote: A pleasant surprise, having known nothing about this film, ahead of time.

Leah F (gb) wrote: It is a cute movie. I watched it babysitting.

Phillip S (gb) wrote: Very arguably the best animated Batman movie.

Ashley H (mx) wrote: Satisfaction is fun to watch. Justine Bateman, Liam Neeson, and Julia Roberts give great performances. The script is good and creative. I enjoyed the music. I think this movie is a must see if you like music or Julia Roberts.

Caesar M (us) wrote: So after choosing to take a break from viewing anything in the action genre I chose something by complete random. Now apparently I'm reviewing an indie movie that is meant to be release in March so I guess I should consider myself somewhat lucky to view it early. Not the case here as so far every movie I view earlier than the intended release date I have come to hate.Vamp U is about vampire Wayne Gretzky accidentally killing his soul mate and turning his soul mate daughter into a vampire which means Wayne, his friends, and the mother have to kill. That's the setup which would have been fine except this is a unfunny comedy! My biggest problem with is the writing and what atrocious writing it is. The first twenty-five seconds of the movie lowered my expectations immediately. That's quite an accomplishment to make your audience not care that fast. The first-five seconds goes something like "She sells sea shells down by the sea shores. Toy boat. Toy boat. Toy boat. Toy boat. Unique New York. Unique New York. My crouch fell". This is possibly the worst first impression anyone can get when viewing a movie. Just imagined trying to sit an entire movie where that is one of the better moments. There's also buildup to final rumble against the vampires in a house, but that's incredibly disappointing. Lets get the obvious problems out of the way. The characters are unlikable, the supporting characters are jerks, there's no logic of any kind, pop culture reference from stuff like Sears are made, stupid comedic lines, and the worst offense being mind numbing stupidity. Now this is a "comedy" but I'll would lying to you it if I called it that. In comedies it's good to take moments from telling joke and build some actual drama but not here. Every single moment is meant to be funny. I don't know about you, but I don't see what's funny in asking a woman "Can I kill your daughter". There's plenty of inappropriate material like this throughout. A girl killed 29 people and that's made into a joke. Having sex with a teacher is turned into a joke. You being told that you have to kill the girl you love because she is became evil is turned into a joke. Even when the mother morning her daughter death the film feels the need to tell a joke. Not even the death speech is meant to be taken serious when you hear "I was still going you kill you, but I made you a mix tape. Mom, your not a b***h".When the film is not trying to be inappropriate we get sex jokes upon sex jokes upon sex jokes. It's tedious not getting different variety of jokes and becomes repetitively painful when unfunny running gags keep appearing. The romance aspect is awful. The romance in Vamp U makes Twilight look like Romeo and Juliet. Also according to this movie women who become vampire are suddenly Gothics. I would question that, but this is the same movie where teacher still has his job despite having sex with one of his student so there's no use to introducing to complex as logic. Now using women looks to keep your audience attention does not work. Unless they have some defining characteristic like intelligence, being funny, or even a personality appearances won't cover the poor writing, poor comedic timing, and no resolution to the story of any kind. If there's anything positive are the actors are okay and unlike the abomination that was "Noobz" it does not offense anyone. Just your brain cells.Vamp U takes everything you could possibly hate from a comedy and mixes it with vampires to poor results. Vamp U is a giant f you to the audience expecting anything remotely watchable.