John-John is young and black, growing up with his mother and stepfather in a boring suburb south of Stockholm. On one of the last days of the summer vacation, they rescue 10-year old ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Vinterviken torrent reviews

Antonio N (fr) wrote: The graphics were good. Keep me interested in the film. Val Kilmer should have a bigger role in the film. He was depicted as a back ground actor.

Davis P (it) wrote: Just ok, definitely not Disney's best.

cli o (mx) wrote: no thanks not my kinda thing

David M (jp) wrote: This will never go out of date it is a true love story that I can relate to.

Prashanth R (us) wrote: Sandra Oh was wonderful to watch! Quintessential story of a daughter's struggle against conservative parents. I loved the little monologues that each character gave.

Justin B (us) wrote: Fucking GREAT soundtrack!

David B (ag) wrote: A sad statement on Turkey's sick and tyrannical culture/state, it's also a moving portrait of how oppression in all its forms--be it constraints enforced by something as intimate as the family to something as collective as the nation--makes for needless and tragic human suffering. Absolutely top-notch stuff.

Vincent P (ru) wrote: What isn't legitimately funny is ludicrously over the top. You simply can't hate this movie.

Jim M (nl) wrote: Piss poor Spaghetti Western.

shai l (gb) wrote: what kind of guy kills himself so his lover and his bestfriend would be together? Scary friendship. Dumb tragedy...

Tony H (fr) wrote: I sat down to 'Warlock' with no illusion that it was somehow going to be be the masterpiece of horror that passed me by years ago and I got pretty much what I expected. A standard 80's, somewhat tame, horror flick. It's more a fantasy film than horror, as there is no real horror element to it. The film is akin more to 'Highlander' than it is to 'Mark of the Devil' and even by the over zealous nature of censorship of horror movies in the 80's, it's extremely tepid.The story, which has been covered on the site before, deals with transportation of a 17th Century Boston warlock (Julian Sands) to "modern day" America and the pursuit of him by the witch hunter Giles Redferne (Richard E. Grant) and 80's chick Kassandra (Lori Singer) as he attempts to stop the necromancer from discovering the locations of a Grand Grimoire, a satanic tome which will revel the true name of God and enable the warlock to undo all of creation...somehow.The story is bunkum, of course, but in films of this type that is usually of a secondary or even tertiary concern. So, it suffices, for the purposes to putting the characters in the places they need to be. But that's it. The makeup and effects are generally sub-par, even for the period, the acting from Lori Singer is awful and the general setting of "modern day" America has been done a thousand times before and it presents nothing new here.All that should mean that 'Warlock' is not a good film and it's not. it's not even a horror's not a bad film either. It does an admirable job during its opening and manages to retain the viewers interest throughout its running time, which is commendable in itself. Julian Sands lends a certain gravity to his part and is very watchable. He plays his character completely straight faced and it's all the better for it. Grant, complete with dodgy Scottish accent, seems to think the whole thing is nonsense, but he's enjoying himself and it comes across. Out of the three leads, Singer is the worst by far. In fairness, her character is limited (although the rapid aging is a good angle), but she just isn't that good an actress and comes across as irritating.Even so, the 90+ minutes of 'Warlock' passes by relatively harmlessly and there are enough good scenes to reward the viewing. Sands and Grant's funny "period talking" is entertaining and the film as a whole is not without its charm. Overall, it's worth a watch, but I don't believe I will be seeking out the sequels.

Gerry (au) wrote: Not Euegne Lourie's greatest, but it's still one of the first dinosaur flix I went nuts over. Excellent Willis O'Brien effects, nasty makeup work on victims of the critters' elctro-nuke zaps, and interestinfg casting. Whoulda thunk that 10 years after being a marine biologist here, Gene Evans would be one of Walter Brennan's dimwit sons in SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL SHERIFF? Gotta love it!

Greg W (de) wrote: another WB prison pic

jay n (it) wrote: Unexceptional crime thriller benefits from London location filming, a cast full of good actors and John Wayne in the lead. The main story is average but it moves at a good pace and has an enjoyable car chase thrown in. The theme music over the opening credits is classic terrible 70's junk but fortunately the rest of the supplemental soundtrack is much more in synch with the feeling of the film.

Carlin S (de) wrote: Way better than I expected. The plot twists were unexpected but believable and the movie had more heart than I've come to expect from movies with this amount of violence.

Dustin A (jp) wrote: The cool thing is this movie is that it was shot in 5 days with no script after they finished SMOKE. The problem is the exact same thing. Still if you liked the first one you'll wanna check it out for all the bits that work and don't and the cool cameos.