Violated Angels

Violated Angels

A young man breaks into a nurse's rooming house and one-by-one kills off nurses.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:56 minutes
  • Release:1967
  • Language:Japanese
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:rape,   murder,   killer,  

A man penetrates by night in a nurse dormitory planning to kill them all. While he accomplishes to his self imposed task thoughts and obsessions come to his mind revealing his love deficits... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Violated Angels torrent reviews

bill s (nl) wrote: Average Sayles fare.

James R (fr) wrote: A werewolf themed story with comedy elements.

Cameron M (it) wrote: Impressive dance sequences and striking cinematography make it an easily iconic visual piece but Flashdance has too little plot to back it up though Jennifer Beals tries her best.

Taylor L (es) wrote: Would have been an interesting plot, if it wasn't depressing to watch...

Alexander C (es) wrote: Roger is a beleaguered New York City meter maid who is plagued by anxiety and low self-esteem. In order to overcome his feelings of inadequacy, Roger enrolls in a top-secret confidence-building class taught by the suavely underhanded Dr. P

Stephen C (fr) wrote: Welles is one of my favourite directors ,mainly due to the fact he loved challeging cinema conventions and is this doc he flits around like a magpie giving us truth,lies and all kinds of trickery. The film focuses on Elmr De Hoy,His biographer Clifford Irving and Oja Kodar all skilled fakers in there own way ,and the fianl faker is of course Welles himself who faked a martian invasion on Radio and would later fake newsreels on Citizen Kane. Well;es is having a grand old time here and you will too as he gives us each indvidaul story ,From De Hoy copying the great masters of Art,to Irving faking or not faking a Howard Hughes biography to Kodar who may or may not have made off with 22 Picassos ,which no one has ever seen . although I may be lying about that part Its all wrapped up in a tidy bundle and full of editing and camera trickery to keep you guessing all the way to the end. A whole load of fun and clever to boot

Chip L (jp) wrote: One of the worst movies ever, don't waste your time or money! Can't believe Kevin Bacon made this crap.

Thomas K (nl) wrote: *shrugs* It could have been worse, I guess.

Jan S (us) wrote: Best movie I've ever seen!

Brett H (us) wrote: Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is the second book-to-film adaptation from one of Seth Grahame-Smith's extremely popular novels, and much like the last attempt (Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter), this film completely misses the mark and was far duller than any film with that title has the right to be. The film stars mainly TV actors like Lily James, Jack Huston, Charles Dance, Lena Headey, and Matt Smith, who are all just "fine", the latter giving a truly terrible performance that made my eyes and ears sore every second he was on-screen. The film certainly had potential, especially with the growing craze for zombie entertainment, but I'd say the final product is 75% Pride and Prejudice, and only 25% zombies; not what I signed up for. The story is BRUTALLY boring, and I simply don't care about any of the Bennet sisters, or their entire futures relying on finding a husband. There are a couple of startling moments and some good kills in the film; the highlight being the very first zombie who is decapitated with a broken glass from the first-person perspective, but these moments are few and far between. Basically, unless you're a Jane Austen fan, this film has very little for anyone else and I was highly disappointed by the slack pace, wooden characters, and so-so violence. The film also laughably sets itself up for a sequel, but there is zero chance of that ever happening!