After completing his studies in London, England, Shakti Thakur returns home to India in a small town where his family resides.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:127 minutes
  • Release:1997
  • Language:Hindi,English
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:murder,   fight,   decapitation,  

After completing his studies in London, England, Shakti Thakur returns home to India in a small town where his family resides. Accompanying him is his leggy girlfriend, Anita, who he is in ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Virasat torrent reviews

Ramya K (ag) wrote: BETTER WATCH THIS MOVIE IN COMING DIWALI ON ''SUN TV.''...So the movie titles the UTTER FLOP......Every actors of this movie has been showed as comedians...Definitely this movie is a dump in Jeeva's carrier.... this is not a fame...It is very difficult to make a super hero subject....Miskin would have succeeded with this same story, only without superhero concept....My Qs,1) Why the policemen were so careless about the thief they brought to the court?stupid..2) Why do you suppress the policemen to get impress the superhero???Cant he be extraordinary???3) How come a middle class family boy have a Sherlock home grandfather upstairs, that to with a costume designer? undigested4) What did the mugamoodi do??? nothing effectively.... sucks......5) Naren is talking too much like a he acting???? yeakss...6) Why do you kill the master after he teach the last part of kungfu????UNWANTED SENTIMENT....7) Why do you suddenly go kidnapping children????to impress them???8) What do Girish Karnad and 2 others do in the climax???do they worth for it??rather than our policemen????comedy piece 9) Why the climax place was horrible???? sluggish...10) Does the climax stunt sounds better???....NO UTTER WASTE....UTTER WASTE of money. Watch it for here and there Jeeva stunt + few drops of comedy in a glass of BG music....Thus, BETTER WATCH THIS MOVIE IN COMING DIWALI ON ''SUN TV.''...

WS W (de) wrote: Seems there is something big to say. But then, there was actually nothing to say at all.

Maria N (br) wrote: I remembered the cult movie "Holy Mountain".

Guilherme N (it) wrote: How a minor popular straight drag queen artist can become an interesting subject to a movie. Matt Damon plays beautifully a difficult character, in its simplicity, navet and honest emotions. The "palatial kitsch" becomes natural to the public, like the portrait of a time when gay codes where not explicitly perceived by the average man.

James S (mx) wrote: Alfred Hitchcock's last feature film and probably his worst. The humor attempts at humor where awful and aside from a plot twist, there is little to like about the film.

rica M (kr) wrote: Anyone who loves to dance and/or latin culture will adore this movie! It's just perfect :)

anjum s (au) wrote: Because I love Steve Carell.

Gian C (es) wrote: Me and my brother thought this was funyn

Nik M (es) wrote: Considering it comes from one of the strongest, groundbreaking graphic novels of all time, the animated adaptation doesn't seem to live up to much. The added portions of Batgirl's backstory is unreasonable and ends up misreading what the original story focused on. It tries to put a spotlight on the emotional tugging of the story - misplacing it in the process (from Joker to Batgirl) - instead of focusing more answering solid questions that expand and explore the moralistic grounds of the story (ex: what defines Gordon's morals? What grounds do Batman and Gordon share in morality? What's the difference?). While the voice acting is good, as per usual with Conroy and Hamill, and the animation is simply OK, the rest of the film only benefits in spots that are directly taken from the novel, which leads one to ask "Why bother watching the film when I gain more from the novel?" The answer: you don't bother.