#

Waqt Ki Deewar

Cruel and lustful Thakur Dayal Singh (Amjad Singh) brutally rapes Sarla (Nazneen), forcing her to commit suicide, leaving her young children, Vikram and Munna, homeless. Vikram and Munna ...

. . Vikram and Munna . Cruel and lustful Thakur Dayal Singh (Amjad Singh) brutally rapes Sarla (Nazneen), forcing her to commit suicide, leaving her young children, Vikram and Munna, homeless

Waqt Ki Deewar is a great movie of N/A. The released year of this movie is 1981. There are many actors in this movie torrents, such as Birbal, Preeti Ganguli, Rajan Haksar, Jeetendra, Satyendra Kapoor, Amjad Khan, Kader Khan, Sanjeev Kumar, Rajendra Nath, Nazneen, Paintal, Sulakshana Pandit, Pran, Shivraj, Neetu Singh. There are many categories, such as Romance. Many people rated for this movie, Rate is 6.1 in www.imdb.com. This is really a good movie torrents. Share with your friends and watch this movie together . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

Waqt Ki Deewar torrents

Waqt Ki Deewar full movie

Waqt Ki Deewar 1981 torrent

Waqt Ki Deewar torrent, Waqt Ki Deewar movie torrents, download Waqt Ki Deewar full movie, Waqt Ki Deewar 1981 torrents, download Waqt Ki Deewar 1981 torrents, watch Waqt Ki Deewar movie, Waqt Ki Deewar englishsub, free download Waqt Ki Deewar movie, movie Waqt Ki Deewar torrent

Links Name Quality Seeders Leechers Size
Download   Waqt Ki Deewar 1981 X264 AAC ◊ Hindi Other 29 32 1.04 GB

Users reviews


Aaron W (us)

Eat your cake of badassery. Eat it. Throw Monte Hellman, Harry Dean Stanton and cockfighting into the mix and you've got yourself a regular badass cake. When you've got Warren Oates in a film, you already know it's gonna be badass


Blake P (ca)

Imagine that. I cannot think of a modern romance film that has affected me so immensely - it's one of the best ever made, without all that Hugh and Julia bullshit that I sometimes like. So where "Before Sunrise" was a poignant indie exercise, "Before Sunset" draws on what made it great and transforms itself into a poignant indie masterpiece. What they do here is enormously difficult - how can a sequel be a cohesive continuation, and how can a film whose success is solely based on conversation act as a feature? - but it looks effortless. Hawke and Delpy have effervescent electricity running in-between them, and their dialogue, co-written with Linklater, suggests improvisation when the truth is totally otherwise. Most impressive is the repartee between Hawke, Delpy, and director Richard Linklater, who work together so fluidly that completing the sentence of the other wouldn't be out of the question. Jesse and Cline are the rare exception because their affection seems genuine; it's like watching people watch in love, and we take for granted what an enthralling experience that can be in the movies. We want them to be together in a way never felt in most romantic films, as we feel like we know them, have spent time with them, unlike most where a few cute incidents and dramatic make-out sessions are enough to enforce true love. We are embroiled in this relationship, and, differing from most film characters, we love Jesse and Cline. And so the movie is a second chance, and a lyrical one at that. This change of fate acts as the center of the film - what would have happened had the couple met again half-a-year later? they (and we) ask themselves (and ourselves) over and over again. But in "Before Sunset," it is revealed that, while Jesse came as promised, Cline did not, due to familial tragedy. Those familiar with "Before Sunrise" might recall an ending that promised that the central twosome would meet again in Vienna after six months, exchanging no contact information solely because trust seemed like enough. " And so begins hours of chatter, both small and big, both witty and confessional. Cline catches him just as he's leaving what she bills her "favorite bookstore. He's on a press tour, his last stop Paris. Them coming across each other by too-good-to-be-true chance perhaps isn't so strange: Jesse has become a hugely successful author in the last decade or so, his latest best-seller being a semi-autobiographical tale about his fateful night with Cline. Because much has changed in the nine years since they saw each other last: Jesse is unhappily married and has a young son, and Cline has dedicated her professional life to a sizable amount of activism. And we like Jesse and Cline more now, fond of how they've matured in the crossroads of being a thirty-something. The fleeting nature of "Before Sunrise" is nowhere to be found, a special, temporary night being replaced by a now-or-never afternoon in which self-reflection is integral. More is at stake, a sense of yearning for fulfillment being much more urgent. "Before Sunset" is an improvement from its predecessor, the wonderful "Before Sunrise" (1995), the characters being older and less optimistic than they once were, the content establishing itself as more involving, and with a screenplay written by the leading actors themselves and thereby strengthening the likable realism of the film. We could listen to them converse for days, their musings wise yet sweeping when in the presence of the other. Affection hovers in their eyes, but their relation is as cerebral as it is physically magnetic. We're are, instead, moved by watching them speak to each other, divulging their laments on life, love, their fears, their pleasures. In them, we are witnesses to the relationship between the greatest cinematic couple of the 1990s, Jesse (Ethan Hawke) and Cline (Julie Delpy), but we aren't moved by their love because they can't keep their hands off each other, because physical passion is sexier than anything us average folks could muster. " films is that their romance is consuming without being in your face about it. . . Most appealing about the "Before


Bob W (ca)

Formulaic, predictable and unpleasant


Brian H (nl)

one bizzare movie, about one boys struggle, and boy does he struggle, and so do i


Dave M (mx)

What a fun little project. Just when the pace begins to dull, James and Jenna drop another train on us. It's like Michael Scott meets Borat. Delightful, harmless, and deceptively offensive


Emmy M (de)

It's errything. Funny, gross, silly, scary, campy. I saw it in theaters when it came out and watch it occasionally because it's SO MUCH FUN. This is one of my favorite movies of all time


Francisco S (jp)

Not touching, with a lack of originality and a lack of interest, December Boys bring to us a movie with a predictable narrative and poorly acted


Gil G (fr)

Bit of a bounty hunter flick. This rating may change after I see it properly. The bits I did see seemed interesting enough for a rewatch. Didn't pay full attention this time through


Jacob H (ca)

But beware, this is a movie that inevitably will make you think if you see it through to the end. I highly recommend this to both of you. . . In fact, if you are an atheist, or a person of strong religious faith. Non-religious people should be fine however as you all should be quite used to your beliefs being questioned fiercely. this is not the film for you either. . . . Additionally, any people of religious faith who have either not really put much deep thought into your faith or are simply uncomfortable with anyone rattling the cage. you will get bored and this is not the movie for you. . . For those that have any level of ADD, or require an action sequence to maintain your attention, or simply rarely like to exercise the old 'brain muscle'. The ending is the kicker and was a fine ending to this kind of film. I was actually deeply enthralled throughout. Perhaps it is because I have been engaged in and enjoyed these kinds of deep conversations with people with opposite perspectives in my own life, but I loved this movie. and this was necessary as White's bleak perspective of things would have been too difficult to hold the audiences attention in large chunks at the start. . . Samuel L Jackson's character dominates the direction of the conversation throughout most of the first 2/3 of the film. What follows is a conversation of alternative perspectives about the meaning of life, with both sides offering intelligent insights of both sides that neither have considered before, which sometimes manages to expose flaws in both of their thinking. White however is a man with no faith whatsoever in any higher being and sees little reason to continue his existence in a world where he sees no meaning. Therefore he is utterly convinced that he and White were meant to meet because God wants Black to save him from wanting to end his life. 'Black' was once a bad man of no faith, who at a critical point of his life believes that God spoke to him and saved him by sending him a better direction to live his life. however this is where the film begins. . . How Black convinces White to do this is never really explained. The unnamed character (in the credits known as 'white') who is highly intelligent and educate but has lost whatever previous strength that he had to sustain him and has decided to end his life by throwing himself in front of a train (The Sunset Limited) and another unnamed man (referred into the credits as 'Black') who is equally intelligent, but educated only from his own life experiences who intervenes and somehow convince White to come with him back to his apartment to talk. It tells the story of two complete strangers meeting by chance (or by divine intervention depending on who you choose to believe). This leaves it entirely up to the performances of the actors to engage your attention for the entire 90 minutes. The location of the crummy apartment in some ghetto area of the city never changes from the beginning of the story to the end, remaining faithful to its original stage roots. It is completely dialogue based, and apart from watching the actors faces during their verbal deliveries it is otherwise as minimalist as you could imagine. This movie is simultaneously difficult to recommend and impossible not to recommend


Kevin R (au)

rade: C+. "I'm so proud of you, Charlie. I'd catch this if nothing better is on. This isn't a masterpiece, but has some plot elements that make it worth seeing once. I finally got around to watching this and found it better than I anticipated. "What's a little piss among friends?"I came across this some time ago on Netflix and added it to my queue. The cast includes Shia LaBeouf, Evan Rachel Wood, Rubert Grint, Vincent D'Onofrio, and Melissa Leo. The dialogue and characters are clever and well written and the acting was above average. The storyline for this picture is interesting and worth following. "Fredrik Bond delivers Charlie Countryman in his directorial debut. "It can all turn to blood in the blink of an eye. If Charlie really wants this girl, he may need to amend things with his family and put his life on the line. The problem, she's dating a black market under-lord. He hits it off with a girl and they fall into a strange kind of love. Charlie is a unique young man with a strained relationship with his family and traveling in a foreign country. That onion is worth peeling