Wasteland

Wasteland

Wasteland is set in a world ravaged by a deadly virus and within that world is Scott Miller, a man who, against the odds, is trying to carve out some sort of life. The deadly infection that has ravaged the globe has almost totally wiped out the human race and Scott must spend his days finding water, food etc. Whilst trying to find uninfected people by radio, he must also avoid the many dangers that lurk in the outside world, while he waits for the return of the love of his life, Beth.

Harvey Miller who is recently released from prison for a crime he didn't commit has revenge on his mind. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Wasteland torrent reviews

Brice B (de) wrote: C'est samedi soir, on cherche un film sympa a voir au cin. Pas grand chose d'interessant a l'affiche, on choisit quand meme "radiostars", mais sans reelle motivation...J'en suis resorti agreablement surpris. Le film est original et possede une belle BO.

Desiree F (br) wrote: i t think its a weird movie

Igor M (jp) wrote: bel film. storico abbastanza classico, ma non troppo concentrato sulla vita del duce. bellissima la scenza finale di Timi che e' un'ottimo attore, e la Mezzogiorno non e' da meno.

Justin T (de) wrote: Enjoyable despite being almost totally unbelievable.

Astrid N (br) wrote: oooh well. the actors are rather bad, as are the dubbing, and the dialogues, and pretty much everything. sure, it's an independent movie, but come on. next time, pick a simpler story to film. i'm still gonna read the book, though.

James E (kr) wrote: Great movie, original plot, Anthony Anderson's acting is second to none.

Victor M (fr) wrote: An ode to love, purity and good heart. This Iranian film is one of that strange pieces of jewelry that from time to time we can find. A movie for children, too different of the dumbest and violent films from super heroes and entities alike. In 1998 was nominated to best foreign language film but it had to face to "Life is beautiful" from Benigni. The scene with father and son ride a bicycle made me remind of Vittorio de Sica's "Bicycle Thieves"

William O (jp) wrote: practical and homemade effects are clever and the sets are nice to look at... it's what is to be expected from a Terry Gilliam flick....but little to no character building is in my opinion is the films weak point....I never came to care for the characters.. just got the only message the movie beating my head over and over again is that we have become so dependant on technology that it's "Evil"...still its an OK flick not the best Terry Gilliam film..but its ok

Pavan R (it) wrote: A well made exciting movie. Great to watch even in 2014 inspite of the newer space movies like Gravity. Well edited and directed with a definite retro feel though.

Edith N (ru) wrote: Slow Going, but Worth the Trip Today, I rediscovered how very, very much I wish I got Turner Classic Movies. I don't read their schedule, because it would just depress me; I would trade AMC, all my sports channels, all my shopping channels, all my "music" channels (now VH1 doesn't seem to be loving things anymore), and Fox News for it. Probably others, really; I don't watch much TV these days. However, as you may recall if you're a regular reader, we did [i]Hail, the Conquering Hero![/i] Sunday night. It's a charming piece of comedic World War II propaganda from Preston Sturges. Today, I was asked if I'd seen it; it was on TCM Sunday night, and the person asking was interested in my opinion of it. Now, I don't mind having made it a Netflix selection; I tend to watch six of their movies a week on a three-at-a-time plan, so that comes to, what, less than a dollar a movie? Not bad, really. However, I know with terrible certainty that not even KCTS will play an Ozu movie, and while I don't know if TCM does subtitles or not, the odds are better. Komajuro Arashi (Ganjiro Nakamura) is a traveling player with a minor company in post-war Japan. He is not young, and his company is not successful. Years before, when he was younger, he visited the small town he visits here and had some sort of relationship--we don't get a lot of details, really--with sake bar owner Oyoshi (Haruko Sugimura). They had a son, Kiyoshi Homma (Hiroshi Kawaguchi), together, but they have told Kiyoshi all his life that Komajuro is his uncle, because he cannot bear the thought of his son's knowing that his father is someone so unsavoury. Komajuro is now in a relationship with the lovely Sumiko (Machiko Ky), an actress of the troupe. She finds out about Oyoshi and Kiyoshi, and she is horribly jealous. She decides to get back at Komajuro by sending Kayo (Ayako Wakao), she of slightly loose morals, to seduce the boy. The way women are portrayed in this movie is slightly uncomfortable. Yes, Komajuro's relationship with Oyoshi is, by this point, quiet and comfortable--they are old friends now. They share a pride in their son. And I guess it's true that, at the time Kiyoshi would have been conceived, there were a lot of children being conceived to unmarried parents, and at that parents who would never in this world see each other again. But Sumiko takes out her anger and jealousy on, let's face it, an innocent. True, hurting Kiyoshi hurts Komajuro. It's just that it's a horrible way to do it. It's not Kiyoshi's fault that his parents are still on good terms, for one thing. And then there's Kayo. Yes, by the end of the film, she's fallen in love with Kiyoshi. On the other hand, she is quite happy to seduce him for money. At that, Sumiko was, before she became an actress, a prostitute. I have no problem with Oyoshi. It's just that other two women have, at least initially, no qualms with using their sexuality to get what they want. It is a beautiful film, of course. It's one of Roger's favourites, and I can see why. It's a very quiet film. Director Yasujiro Ozu is unafraid to pause for a moment and just let us watch the rain fall. There is that comfort between the two old lovers, the peace that doesn't require talking to express itself. I didn't much get into the story itself, but I could see it unfolding. There was quiet, and most directors are afraid of that. Even in its angry moments, there are pauses, and the rain falls. (Actually, it doesn't rain that much in the movie, but I like rain.) Ozu's actors are good enough to let emotion play on their faces without having to talk all the time, move all the time, to let us know what's behind their eyes. I was talking to Moses recently about what makes a great director, and the ability to get performances like this out of your actors is really the first thing on my list and why a lot of popular directors aren't great. I spent most of the movie wondering who Kiyoshi thought his father was. He's not really a boy; he works in the post office and is saving up for college. Even if he were, though, the timeline doesn't permit him to be young enough not to have asked the question. After all, it has been many years since Komajuro was in the village. If it had been maybe six, and that was when the son was conceived, that might have been possible. A very small boy might be excused for not considering his father. However, he had to have been told something. When Sumiko, in anger, asks Kiyoshi that dangerous question, I quite wanted to know the answer. I assume Komajuro claims to be Oyoshi's brother. If he claimed instead to be the father's brother, it would surprise me to find out Kiyoshi had never considered the possibility that it wasn't true. I suppose, given the timing, he might be told that his father died in the war without its seeming improbable. It's just a thought I had that I wasn't sure the movie did.

Mohamed H S (nl) wrote: A great movie by woody allen with the strategy he made from rolling over the memories and the talking to the camera "unique" work and one of the most beautiful realistic romance movies ever made

Rob P (gb) wrote: A bit on the slow side, but an interesting twist on the zombie genre. This time there is a cure, but a costly one, and people are prejudiced against these returned. A few twists and turns, and interesting enough.

Mike M (jp) wrote: Sorry but have yet to like a Terrance Mallck film and I still don't . I admire that he tries to be different and artistic and "say something" but this film is a self indulgent piece of crap that has nothing new say.