Watan Ke Rakhwale

Suraj and Arun are brothers who share a special bond. Suraj, a jail warden and his wife Lakshmi have brought up Arun. Radha is an orphan from a wealthy family. Radha is set to marry Naresh,...

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length: 0 minutes
  • Release: 1987
  • Language: Hindi
  • IMDB link: Watan Ke Rakhwale
  • Keywords: Watan Ke Rakhwale 1987 full movies, Watan Ke Rakhwale torrents movie

. . Radha is set to marry Naresh,. Radha is an orphan from a wealthy family. Suraj, a jail warden and his wife Lakshmi have brought up Arun. Suraj and Arun are brothers who share a special bond

Watan Ke Rakhwale is the best great movie of N/A. This movie was introduced in 1987. There are many actors in this movies torrent, for example Sunil Dutt, Dharmendra, Mithun Chakraborty, Ashok Kumar, Moushumi Chatterjee, Sridevi, Prem Chopra, Puneet Issar, Shakti Kapoor, Kader Khan, Mac Mohan, Lalita Pawar, Parikshat Sahni, Birbal, Sudhir Dalvi. Movie' genres are Musical. The rating is 6.2 in www.imdb.com. This is really a good movies torrent. Enjoy this movies torrent and share to your friends . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

Watan Ke Rakhwale torrents

Watan Ke Rakhwale full movie

Watan Ke Rakhwale 1987 torrent

Watan Ke Rakhwale torrent, Watan Ke Rakhwale movie torrents, download Watan Ke Rakhwale full movie, Watan Ke Rakhwale 1987 torrents, download Watan Ke Rakhwale 1987 torrents, watch Watan Ke Rakhwale movie, Watan Ke Rakhwale englishsub, free download Watan Ke Rakhwale movie, movie Watan Ke Rakhwale torrent

Links Name Quality Seeders Leechers Size
Download   Watan Ke Rakhwale 1987 DvDrip ~ Action | Adventure | Crime ~ [Rd DVDRip 39 31 1.39 GB

Users reviews

Angel G (jp)

A nice ending, good performances, the suspense/eroticism and being a movie very well shot, might be enough to ignore it's silly script and it's lacked chemistry between Stone and Baldwin (although, it's a movie about a guy (Baldwin) who wants desire or pleasure from the woman (Stone), so technically there wasn't really suppose to be romantic chemistry). It's a mix of eroticism and suspense thriller, which it does work on both departments, but it never gives full payoff and it really should have been a lot better. Sharon Stone and Tom Berenger give interesting performances, on the other hand William Baldwin, who is a charming male lead, lacked to steal the show as the handsome hotel manager who tries desirably to be (or seduce) with Sharon Stone. Sliver is an above-averge thriller, with a great cast, suspenseful moments, but doesn't pack enough memorable moments that should have had

bill s (us)

Silly and course and I liked it that way. The low brow approach helps not hurts this film

Danni G (mx)

It really deserves its place as a classic. It makes you want to get up and dance in the happy scenes, and it makes you feel the weight of the heavier scenes. Its one of those movies where every time you watch it you notice another fun detail. Its the perfect mix of magical and fun and sad and complex. But other than that, the movie is weirdly perfect. Its honestly kind of disheartening. None of the adults treat her with the interest that they treat her brother either. Jane is just the cute innocent that tells her brother to calm down from time to time. " Not only does this not carry through out the rest of the movie, but thats not a character. Jane, on the other hand, gets "prone to giggling and doesn't put things away. He screams and refuses to do things and acts like a child would. Her brother, Michael, is described as "extremely stubborn and suspicious", and that carries through the movie. Honestly, my only complaints on the movie are that Jane has literally no character. The effects still hold up really well, and the story is just as magical for me as an adult as it was as a child. Its kind of amazing how great this movie still is, even 50 years after its release. I woke up this morning with "Feed the Birds" stuck in my head, and I realized that I haven't watched this movie since I was 12

David W (mx)

Epatha Merkerson was a pleasant surprise as I am used to seeing her in more dramatic roles. I think S. The more I watch it, the more I like it

Harry W (gb)

So Anywhere but Here benefits from the skilled performances of Natalie Portman and Susan Sarandon, but the conventional story is weighed down by a poorly structured series of events and less originality yet plenty of predictability. It proves effective in an entertainment sense and brings out the best of acting in both of them. There is a real sense of love shared between them as well as conflict which evokes a sense of realism and works as a powerful driving force in the film, and what they share is never overly sentimental or melodramatic. The chemistry shared between these two actors is brilliant. Her line delivery is always on time and appropriately emotional, so she really reaches out to the other characters well. Susan Sarandon is passionately energetic in the part and does a great job bringing the heart of her character out for audiences to see. There is a lot of passion in her performance which illuminates the elements that make up her character as a mother and a determined woman while there are subtle elements that point out her less savoury elements as a person. Either way she gets the character right by implementing in her own natural charismatic spirit the entire time. What she expresses is thoroughly touching and really likable because the love is all there while the subtext points out that it is largely blinded by her own self-indulgent wants. Yet as it progresses, we see her gradually transition into a more serious person who comes to terms with what it truly means to be a mother. At the start of the film, Susan Sarandon has a free spirited and light nature about her. While the writing in the film does not give her character any sense of consistency, she manages to keep up with it the entire time. Susan Sarandon also delivers a predictably powerful effort. Natalie Portman dedicates herself to every little element of the character Ann August, both physically and emotionally which gives the story a likable lead character who really manages to grasp the dramatic intentions of the experience, and so her Golden Globe nominated performance is one of the greatest early efforts. Her level of humanity is nothing short of realistic and the impact she makes is powerful because the control she has over her emotions is incredible. Natalie Portman manages to make a compelling effort in Anywhere but Here by using her fierce emotional involvement and strong line delivery to battle Susan Sarandon for the screen. Natalie Portman shines in Anywhere but Here because she is so dedicated to the character and to bringing the realism out of the scene that she even manages to overshadow Academy Award winner Susan Sarandon. Tackling the serious coming of age themes in Anywhere but Here, Natalie Portman gives a performance with a lot of serious sophistication and exceptional acting talent for someone of such a young age. At age 17, she manages to use the incredible acting talent that would later win an Academy Award to maximum potential. Natalie Portman is a wonderful lead in Anywhere but Here. But the actual reason I watched the film, the performances of the two leading actors, was thoroughly astounding. Anywhere but Here works in terms of style and characters, but it doesn't have a story which is original enough or structured well enough to honestly ensure that it comes out as strong in enough areas. Anywhere but Here is a film with the best intentions which maintains a stylish directorial effort from Wayne Wang, but it ends up falling into many of the same basic cinematic conventions of countless other mother-daughter films which is slightly worse this time around as it actually defies some prime potential in the process. The way that the two main characters in the story are presented and develop are some of the better elements of the film and the screenplay does make them strong figures, but when good characters are weighed down by a thin story and poorly structured storytelling then the potential for it to be really affecting is blunted. Anywhere but Here never really goes anyway with its tale which is a shame because the mother-daughter relationship depicted in the feature is a touching sentiment. There isn't much of a consistency with the feature because the tale unfolds more like a series of segments with all kinds of different dramatic aspects popping up out of nowhere which bring no story development to the situation and are a lot more focused on trying to depict the way the film's main characters act in a variety of situations with no strong connection between them all or sense that the story is genuinely progressing. Anywhere but Here doesn't have much of a story at all. The role reversal in the film is not explored to its full potential which means that it doesn't take long before Anywhere but Here is reduced to its conventional sense of storytelling. Soon, both characters end up overly worried in one way or another with the free-spirited nature of Ann August ends up reduced to nothing more than a sense of irresponsibility which interferes with her attempts to deal with the world in a more serious fashion like her daughter. It seems like an interesting concept for a while, but as the story progresses it wears off. You would think that this ends up being one of the best aspects of the story, but unfortunately it is not. In contrast to the usual story about a free-spirited daughter and an overbearing mother, Anywhere but Here features a free-spirited mother and a constantly worrying daughter. The thing that makes it stand out from the countless other similar films is the fact that there is a role-reversal that goes on between the characters portrayed by Natalie Portman and Susan Sarandon. The story in Anywhere but Here is a pretty conventional one. Teaming up two of my favourite actresses in a mother-daughter story, Anywhere but Here sounded like an unmissable spectacle of acting

Jacklord Alan K (jp)

Just a regular action movie with a plot that doesn't make sense

Jay B (br)

Just be prepared for some awkward TV cuts and some rough scenes that give you Rob Lowe instead of JFK. Sure, it screams soap opera at times and it falls a tiny bit flat when propped up next to Killing Lincoln, but it's still worth your time. It stuffs you full of straightforward storytelling. Killing Kennedy doesn't play around with conspiracy theories

Michael G (nl)

uite funny :P. I think it was a good movie overall. The swearing was kinda unnecessary, but heck, thats easily enough edited out. Quite a good movie

Mon K (fr)

ung and his patient Sabina Spielrein! Very slow-going at times! Casting was superb though!. Not a big fan of Cronenberg and that didn't change after seing this film! Wasn't overly impressed with the storyline which is very losely based on Sigmund Freud's friendship with Dr

Myla C (ru)

pretty moving stuff. two people with wild chemistry. as a fan of the band in all aspects the doc was extremely well put together and produced