Wedding Planners

Wedding Planners

Shruti and Bittoo decide to start a wedding planning company together after they graduate from university, but romance gets in the way of business.

  • Rating:
    4.00 out of 5
  • Length:127 minutes
  • Release:2010
  • Language:Hindi,English,Panjabi
  • Reference:Imdb
  • Keywords:dancing,   wedding,   kiss,  

Two wedding planner-partners achieve success but differences turn them into bitter rivals. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Wedding Planners torrent reviews

Monica E (ca) wrote: The voiceover was so terrible it made the movie unbearable to watch

Don S (es) wrote: Good to see Ray Wise and Dana Ashbrook teaming up together again in this thriller with a unique type of hero.

Paul D (ag) wrote: A decent attempt at making a pseudo-style slasher horror in another world.

Jonathan G (mx) wrote: A bit slow. Quirky, like most films from New Zealand (minus the LOTR trilogy). Stars Jermaine from Flight Of The Conchords. It gets better toward the end. Think 'Napoleon Dynamite' meets 'Me and You and Everyone We Know'. Almost funny, but more just quirky and random.

Kevin L (it) wrote: Val Waxman (Allen) es un neurtico director de cine que, tras conseguir dos veces el scar, ha cado en el olvido. El fracaso lo ha llevado al mundo de la publicidad, pero l anhela desesperadamente volver a los escenarios. A pesar de que lo abandon por un gran productor, su ex-mujer (Ta Leoni) sigue confiando en su talento y le propone dirigir una pelcula de gran presupuesto que producira su novio. Pero justo antes de empezar el rodaje, Val se queda ciego. Como no est dispuesto a desaprovechar esta oportunidad, decide ocultar su ceguera a todo el mundo y seguir adelante con la pelcula.

RajanSatish P (br) wrote: Apart from the skin,this movie has great story that is skin deep and it really takes a great amount of concentration to understand the end of the movie. Great quote from this movie "The first advantage is at the end of the story. It doesn't finish, it falls in a hole. And the story starts again halfway. The other advantage, and the biggest, is that you can change course along the way... If you let me. If you give me time."

Jake A (fr) wrote: Not only is this movie boring but it is entirely predictable, has one too many stupid moments in it, only a couple of decent actors make an appearance and despite the fact the rescue mission has been a complete failure it tries to go for the typical happy ending that Hollywood loves so much. Only good points are the action, it looks great and has a few thrills.

Matthew S (us) wrote: Comedy seldom gets this dark, savage and twisted. It might be a bit too disgusting for many, but this is a thrill ride of a movie. And, it is very well crafted.

Ruthie G (nl) wrote: this movie was truly amazing movie!!!

Les E (fr) wrote: The fire is spectacular but other than that this is a poor attempt at an epic.

Harry W (mx) wrote: Clockers opens in the iconic Spike Lee style with images portraying murdered African-Americans and other violent pictures thrust into the viewer's face along with rich music, and so the atmosphere is instantly set.Soon however, Clockers becomes a thing of my disinterest. Mainly, the story being told in Clockers makes use of a large quantity of repetitive dynamics without sufficient direction in the story which leads it into plenty of territory that has already been treaded into many times before in Spike Lee films and various others, and so the creativity of Spike Lee as a director isn't enhanced which makes it feel like a routine story.Clockers mainly failed to captivate my interest because the story didn't suck me in. It was just a cohort of random characters at various locations which never seemed that key to the story and seemed to deviate from the plotline so much that it eventually becomes forgotten about. And the entire cast was decent, but there were so many characters that I were forgetting which ones had done what or how they played a role in the story, and basically where was just no character involved in the murder which I felt like I could care about until the final climax of the story where everything got crammed into a brief period and the entire rest of the story seemed obsolete in determining the answers to the many questions asked because it was summed up in a scene involving three essential characters: The Investigator, The Murderer and the man who caused the murder. Since only 3 characters were eventually important to the story, spending about 2 hours figuring out the importance that all the other characters played made things tedious and resulted in the viewing pleasure from Clockers or the understanding of the titular term minimal.On the plus side, the story was tied together by Harvey Keitel's fine performance since he captures the role of a dedicated police officer with an angry tendency to act with crude language well. It displays the sides he's known for, since he plays a sympathetic, conflicted and heroic character like his role in Thelma & Louise as well as using the language and tone of voice of a thug as a front to display his imperfections. Although his role wasn't so big, when he had the screen he took it by storm and gave one of his finest performances in years.Plus, as usual with a Spike Lee film the script is good, and this time since it was adapted from a Richard Price novel with the work of him as Spike Lee, it shows that Spike Lee knows how to ensure his adaptation is true to the story and combine his natural talent for screenwriting into it all very finely.Plus, the climax of the story was a powerful one and featured strong messages as about juvenile delinquency and the role models they follow after, and amongst that was themes of brotherhood. The drama in that scene and what followed was strongly compelling, and its a shame the story took so long to get to that.So parts of Clockers were good, but waiting for them was not and there was little to compel me to try and do so except for Harvey Keitel's performance.

Jackie M (fr) wrote: Had me in stiches, one of the best films I've seen