What Richard Did

What Richard Did

What Richard Did is a striking portrait of the fall of a Dublin golden-boy and high school rugby star whose world unravels one summer night.

Richard seems to have everything with a beautiful lover, many good friends and graduates from a famous high school. Unfortunately, the life of him changes absolutely after a drunken brawl which leads him to terrible consequences. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   What Richard Did720p4735699.5 MB
Download   What Richard Did1080p34431.3 GB

What Richard Did torrent reviews

O Ryan F (us) wrote: 3 Geezers has a couple of my favorite actors in it; Tim Allen and J.K. Simmons. It has the added bonus of being Michelle Schumacher's directitorial debut. I'm looking forward to seeing it (if it doesn't gather an 'R' rating).

Criss T (es) wrote: I enjoyed watched this film

Emma P (us) wrote: relentlessly bleak. Seen as the mystery film at the Glasgow film festival, not something Iwould have sought out. Undoubtedly some fabulous acting, but grim, rambling, exploration of sanity, the soul, taboos. Only if you want to impress someone with how artsy you are, and then I'd go for Beckett every time. Every time. There is no enough drugs or booze in the world to make me watch this again.

Dave C (au) wrote: Completely defies the law of sequels getting progressively worse by managing to be better than all three of the Christoper Walken installments - John Light makes a fantastic good/bad/good/bad/good/badguy and Sean Pertwee is as always awesome. It's a massive shame this is only on Region 1 DVD, as it's a great change in direction for the series. I highly recommend seeking it out...

Rick L (kr) wrote: One of the best movies most people haven't even heard of.

Randy T (ru) wrote: I have no idea how Jacques Doillon managed to get such sincere performances out of 4 year old children (especially Victoire Thivisol) but Bravo Jacques, Bravo!

RiP M (de) wrote: Extremely strange but visually compelling avant-garde art film. Typical Greenaway, but too much style and a little less substance than usual.

Tim G (mx) wrote: Movies such as this are why people think New Jersey is such a shithole.

Harry W (kr) wrote: Though The Karate Kid Part II was a step down for the series, with a third entry still teaming up the same two cast members with director John G. Avildsen it sounded like there were more stories to tell.As well as having the same stars as the first two Karate Kid films, The Karate Kid Part III features the same writer. However, by the point of this film he clarifies that he is out of ideas. It is worth pointing out that he has since distanced himself from the film for his disgust with the manner in which the character Daniel LaRusso was supposedly altered from his original script. I don't blame him for doing that, but I can't find any sense that he had a sense of innovative originality at any point in the film.The Karate Kid Part III is a massive betrayal to the first film. While one of the most important messages in The Karate Kid is that martial arts is to be performed calm and not aggressive as well as for defence rather than offense, The Karate Kid Part III sees the franchise protagonist sucked into being trained at the Cobra Kai Dojo when everybody knows that this is the last thing he would do. This is an insult to the characters and to the legacy originated by the first film in the series. For the first half of the film, the entire movie is about narrative building and none of the narrative has any actual karate in it. The martial arts do not enter the film until past the halfway mark, and by that point the level of creativity in the story has already been established as minimal as has the entertainment value. When the karate does come into the film it is an excess of repetitive fights depicting Daniel LaRusso being dominated by several characters. The choreography is impressive, but the fight scenes fail to compensate for the lack of them in the first half or the poor nature of the entire story. The relevance of the fight scenes are at their most minimal by the final fight scene in The Karate Kid Part III because even though the film is intended to be inspiring, Daniel LaRusso continues to be victimised by the violence of others. He shows no strength against others, and even though in the first film he beat everyone in the tournament and in the second he was able to defend himself in a street fight against Chozen Toguchi, this time around he lands a single successful hit the entire film which of course coincidentally proves to be the one required for tournament victory. After being nothing more than a victim the entire film who serves as everyone's punching bag, Daniel LaRusso suddenly turns it around with a single punch which is so deeply cliche that it is the actual humiliation at the heart of the film, and not what Daniel LaRusso experiences. Since the story has been written so that antagonist Terry Silver wants nothing more than humiliation from Daniel LaRusso, it is doe in the most ridiculous way possible. Frankly, the story in The Karate Kid Part III is all over the place because the use of actual fight scenes are crammed into the second half with minimal creativity while the story itself is consistently generic. At least there isn't a romantic subplot this time around, but the story still borders on it extremely strongly. The only reason that there isn't a romantic subplot is because actress Robyn Lively was 17 at the time of filming and so the legality of the situation did not match the intended vision of the original script. Either way, it fails to make the film any more compelling.Even the dialogue is an overly familiar rehash. I really don't find much I would complain about with the dialogue, but it is mostly the same generic dialogue fed to audiences by the first two films with little in the way of cleverness or comic relief this time around. The characters in general are just poorly written. Even though the film still has its 80's charm and a decent musical score as well as some mild sense of visual appeal, everything is worn down by the poor writing in the film.But I will admit that I didn't find fault with the cast in The Karate Kid Part III.Ralph Maccchio once again steps back into the iconic role of Daniel LaRusso for a final time. He maintains the exact same charm that the character is iconic for. And though the direction taken for the character is poor, Ralph Macchio is able to accurately capture a sense of aggressive darkness within the character which serves as a legitimate driving force behind his actions. It may be limited by the narrative, but Ralph Macchio's efforts cannot be ignored and his determination for both the character and the fight scenes is fairly admirable. Ralph Macchio is the one person who does any justice to Daniel LaRusso in The Karate Kid Part III.And of course, Noriyuki "Pat" Morita is in fine form again. After playing Keisuke Miyagi so many times the character loses his edge and there is no deep level of exploration into him this time since he remains a fractured-English speaking gimmick for the sake of the film. But still, even though the film tries to milk him for all he is worth the natural charm of the actor in his Academy Award nominated role still remains relevant as he still preaches messages of peace and wisdom against the backdrop of martial arts. His actual role in the story is reduced significantly which is a shame, but Noriyuki "Pat" Morita does his part.Thomas Ian Griffith is a welcome newcomer to the cast in The Karate Kid Part III. Even though the character Terry Silver is a slightly more aggressive rehash of John Kreese, the manipulative demeanour that Thomas Ian Griffith puts into the part is able to transcend that. He puts on a facade really well and captures a fake charm for the character with a genuine sense of darkness within him, as well as being accomplished in the physical aspects of the part. Thomas Ian Griffith brings value to The Karate Kid Part III as both an actor and a martial artist, and that's more than you can say about any other cast member in the film.Sean Kanan has little to boast about in terms of acting because he seems like a retread of what William Zabka brought to the first film as Johnny Lawrence, only with less genuine character. But his fighting technique is decent.Robyn Lively is also ok.So The Karate Kid Part III has a talented cast and some decent fight choreography, but the excess of repetition and lack of creativity in the insultingly pathetic excuse for a story is a sad end to the legacy of Daniel LaRusso.

Michael S (es) wrote: This is how you make an amazing film. A masterpiece.

Corey n (fr) wrote: This was a solid movie starring Cary Grant. The story is a romantic drama. Grant plays a character names Alec Walker. He meets and falls in love with a Julie Eden played by Carole Lombard. But there is one catch. He is already in a loveless marriage. His wife played by Kay Francis will not divorce him and wants to ruin Julie Eden life and good name. But this romance will not stop out of true love. Grant and Lombard are great together. Kay Francis plays the great conniving wife that wants to hold on to her marriage just for the money. Also I thought Helen Vinson was great as the best friend to Kay Francis that wanted to cheat with her husband but also acted as a villain as well. The movie has that drama side to it but overall this is a romance film. Well acted and a solid story. Worth a watch for Cary Grant fans or for those looking for a old time romance film.

Manny A (nl) wrote: Watching this movie makes me feel grateful that I have a brother.

Carey L (ag) wrote: Good sequel considering they original director was fired.

Christopher B (gb) wrote: Not a fan. Went on date night, what are you gonna do?

Tim S (ag) wrote: As I said about the other film in Scream Factory's recent Double Feature Blu-ray release, I don't have anything really positive to say about The Beast of Hollow Mountain or its counterpart, The Neanderthal Man. Shout! Factory seemed really intent on releasing this one, as it's also available in a 4 pack DVD release as well, but I don't understand why. The movie is about a typical mad scientist who decides to experiment on animals to test his theories about evolution (causing a sabre-toothed tiger to run around at the beginning of the film) when he decides to experiment on himself, turning him into the Neanderthal Man. He then roams the forest, killing random people and wreaking havoc wherever he goes. First of all, the characters are terrible, including the scientist who is angry about everything all the time, and our leads are just awful. I guess if I had to say something positive it would be that the transformation scenes work done pretty well, but that's all. The movie is pretty terrible considering all of the factors involved. It's another movie that I can't say I'd recommend, even to fans of the genre or of bad movies in general.