Who's Got the Tape

Who's Got the Tape

The police and some gangsters scramble to hide incriminating evidence from an ambitious prosecuting attorney,

The police and some gangsters scramble to hide incriminating evidence from an ambitious prosecuting attorney . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechers

Who's Got the Tape torrent reviews

Caroline G (kr) wrote: Sweet but predictable. Not to mention what felt like a weakly written screenplay. I have no problem with low budget, that's not the issue here. I can't quite put my finger on it. Was it the acting? The storyline? I don't know, the movie just felt kind of "meh". I've seen a lot better.

Bill B (gb) wrote: Finally gave this one a look of the TiVo just to clear some space after it'd languished there fro quite some time, which I have to say I somewhat regretted after I got started on this one when I realized the actual running time. Two hours and 20 minutes? What the fuck? What happened to a 90 minute film in Japan? Are directors paid by the hour? Yeesh, there's no reason this thing needed to be over two hours long, unless they were trying to compact a miniseries or television show into an actual film.A demon hunter's is sold to 48 demons as an infant, then spends his life killing said demons to retrieve his various body parts, eventually helped by a young woman on a mission of her own.It's watchable, but Jesus Christ is it a LONG film. Rental at best for me.

Jasmine S (fr) wrote: Kept my attention while passing the time...didn't think it was anything special though.

Joshua H (ag) wrote: This was an interesting film, although it took several watches for it to actually sink in a bit...even though it is a good film in its own right, I still prefer the actual series and it makes for a better 26 episode series...there's just too much to the story.Note: One of the best anime music scores...EVER!

Sooty M (es) wrote: Yet another top notch film.

Eduardo P (fr) wrote: GENIAL !!! La pelicula menos valorada de todos los tiempos. Un guion increible, el absurdo a la eneava potencia!!! Quiero verla otra vez!!! Y no se consigue...Film de culto.

Mikel B (es) wrote: Sequel is very much different from its 1984 predecessor. It contains more anarchic tones. But, the film is overstuffed with gremlins and becomes a disaster by the time the climactic sequence comes on. I did laugh a few times, however.

Simon P (it) wrote: Not your typical gangster film.

Cody C (nl) wrote: Way better than you'd expect. The cinematography and sets are fantastic, and Berkley does the best she can with the role. Really puts her all into it.

Dillinger P (fr) wrote: If your local theatre group was performing The wizard of oz, as a panto, directed by David Lynch, this would be the outcome. A zany, quirky and often hilarious film, overly saturated in far out performances and a continual punch over the head, dare you forget its meant to be a raunchy take on the classical story... This is by no means his best film, however Wild At Heart is potentially one of Lynch's greatest visual masterpieces, there is so much to love here, it outweighs the bad, not that there is much of it, but what there is, becomes grating and stale very quickly. Sailor and Lula are a young southern American couple, bound regardless of situation, after being released from prison after a charge of manslaughter, Sailor breaks his Parole and drives himself and Lula on a getaway, escaping the grasps of her maniacal mother and her equally zany henchmen. Wild At Heart is Davids love story and here we are treated to one of the most unique relationships I've ever seen on camera, Cage and Dern. We know that Dern's working relationship with Lynch is pristine and she carries her fair share of weight on this movie, however Cage is a wonderful choice of casting. Yes he is over the top, stupid and hilariously cheesy at times, especially with his Elvis renditions, but its all part of the characters charm and I really struggle to see anyone else own the role as much as he does. Thought Dern and Maclachlans chemistry was good in Blue Velvet, wait till you see her and Cage, they fuel each others hilariously over the top performances, until the bar can be set no higher. However dont think that this duo is all the roster has to offer, Diane Ladd, Crispin Glover, Grace Zabrinski, Harry Dean Stanton, Sherlyn Fenn, Jack Nance, Scott Coffey, Isabella Rosillini and Willem Dafoe are all along for the ride and each of them bring a brief but fantastic ham fisted performance to the table. Ladd is excellent as Lula's mother, although that's no great achievement as Dern and Ladd are actual kin, however her maniacal and desperate side is one of the films strongest assets and equally its biggest downfall, as the film comes closer to conclusion, her inclusion lessens, making you miss her dreadfully. Glover has limited screen time with the likes of Nance, Fenn, Coffey, Zabrinski and Rosillini but they all pitch in memorable performances right out the gate. Dafoe however is on fire are hired hitman Billy and the actors manages to morph himself into something astoundingly disgusting, its hard to look at him during his screen time. As mentioned earlier, in my opinion, this is Lynch's most impressive looking film to date, the colours and setting are gorgeous, giving the most consistant looking film he has achieved visually, its rich with colour, detail, wonderful dynamic shots, packed full of imagery and metaphor, which leaves you salvating at the mouth. Angelo Badalamenti as always provides a wonderful score, truly setting this film apart from most of Lynch's catalogue. However, the killer in this film is the script. If i'm being honest, although Lynch does the best job anyone could with his own material, the script just acts like a lynch pin, pardon the pun, far too often. Dern is consitantly referencing the Wizard of Oz or telling stories of her troubled past, it loses a lot of subtilty that we are used to from the maestro. Even near the end, it becomes so presposterous and desperate to find a connection, that it literally needs to shoe horn everything it can to make that connection. It feels like Lynch wasnt confident enough people would make the connection themselves. Its hard to fully blame him, his material isnt exactly appealing to a huge demographic, but here he breaks away a little too much from what makes his brilliance work well. This isnt a bad film, far from it, its rich universe, character and look all make this a brilliant addition to the Lynch canon, however it literally becomes so much like a pantomime that by the end, it is near impossible to take seriously. A worthwhile watch and more accessable than a lot of his other work, however purists will most likely slap this beside Dune in terms of caliber.