You may also like
Worst in Show torrent reviews
Paul D (ru) wrote: A very good movie, but not a great one. Innovative, clever, and well-done, but with a big boost from the Oscar crowd merely from being a movie about Hollywood.
Chris B (ag) wrote: Action movie with a message.
Nagarjuna K (br) wrote: 17 years to watch this splendid movie. "There is so much beauty in this world"
Michael S (ag) wrote: The movies effects may be somewhat dated now, given the 90's release date. However the themes explored and the atmosphere created make for a subtle and overall interesting movie. Something that wouldn't be a bad choice for a remake actually.
Prakash M (mx) wrote: Didn't quite get the movie, but I felt I had lots to learn from it.
Anna Q (ca) wrote: Not a favourite, but Hugh Grant points!
Ian C (br) wrote: Re-watch. This scared the shit out of me on its release in 1992. Although John Fashanu lookalike Candyman is still a freaky cunt, the film itself is fairly wank and turns into just another horror where everyone else thinks the protagonist is going insane as they deal with a supernatural force that only they can see.
Abb J (gb) wrote: Say Anything: After years of silly 80s teen romantic comedies, this one knocked it out of the park, and not just because of that iconic scene showing John Cusack holding a boom box blaring Phil Collins outside his would-be girlfriend's bedroom. Cameron Crowe's story, about a teen bookworm/valedictorian obsessed with creating a perfectly planned future, while being pursued by the likable but directionless recent high school graduate played by Cusack, is smartly-written and has a maturity lacking in other films of the genre. A
Christian B (ru) wrote: Underrated comedy. Not a great movie, but it has a good amount of laughs.
Danny S (es) wrote: This film teaches you to throw the knife, not hold the fucking knife.
Thomas T (mx) wrote: Much better then expected. Gory but not just for the sack of it