After a bombing raid destroys the family store and her husband, Reiko rebuilds and runs the shop out of love stopped short by destruction.

. . Bombing destroys his family's shop and the widow stays to rebuild it as the rest of the family flee and runs it for 18 years out of love for her dead husband. 19yo girl loses husband in war

Yearning is a new movie of Zenzô Matsuyama (screenplay), Mikio Naruse (story). The released year of this movie is 1964. We can counted many actors in this movies torrent, for example Hideko Takamine, Yûzô Kayama, Mitsuko Kusabue, Yumi Shirakawa, Mie Hama, Aiko Mimasu, Yû Fujiki, Kazuo Kitamura, Hisao Toake, Kumeko Urabe, Kan Yanagiya, Yutaka Sada, Yutaka Nakayama, Toshiko Yabuki, Chieko Nakakita. Movie' genres are Drama. This movie was rated by 8.2 in www.imdb.com. This is really a good movie torrents. Enjoy this movies torrent and share to your friends

Yearning torrents

Yearning full movie

Yearning 1964 torrent

Yearning torrent, Yearning movie torrents, download Yearning full movie, Yearning 1964 torrents, download Yearning 1964 torrents, watch Yearning movie, Yearning englishsub, free download Yearning movie, movie Yearning torrent

Links Name Quality Seeders Leechers Size
Download   Naruse - Midareru (1964) Other 33 30 1.37 GB
Download   Yearning Other 32 36 851.43 MB
Download   Midareru akaYearning Other 37 48 4 GB
Download   Midareru (Mikio Naruse, 1964) DVDRip DVDRip 36 45 739.37 MB

Users reviews

Andy P (mx)

Warren Beatty's epic biopic is at once a heart-rending epic love story and an effective presentation of politics and ideological conflict

Andy W (br)

Journal de France provides a fascinating look into the works of photographer/ director Raymond Depardon, whose cinema verite remains riveting, inspiring and poignant to this day

Ari S (it)

I loved the film and I knew that the Bloom casting was bugging me but couldn't put my finger on it until I allowed my self to look at it from another perspective. End of the day he's just a little above average but the director cut of this film is not just visually beautiful, it has the ability to sink in and appreciate if you can get past some of its pre conceived character short comings. With Bloom he hasn't done any films that require him to truly act and gain the respect so when I first saw him my notion was oh he sucks but if u take into account the way he slowly and progressively portrays himself you will see the qualities I'm talking about. However those actors all were perceived as talented and are established before taking on there first leading 100 mil drama films and notions were that they are talented because they had done enough to prove it. The film puts a lot of pressure on him to act without saying anything and some actors are inherently amazing at portraying that like Tom Hardy, Gosling or DiCaprio. In act 3 you can see his faith and confidence in who he is becoming is apparent and believable. People are telling him there opinions and he is learning, taking things in and understanding so that he is no longer reactive (killing his brother in the beginning although he deserved it) but pensive, introspective and quiet. He is a man who has lost everything and progressively coming into his own as a man. Here's why. It's takin a while but I've concluded that with the dialogue, progression and what's happened to him his depiction is actually portrayed well. One of which is my constant question on Bloom. I have come back to watch this film several times since it's released for many reasons

Daniel K (es)

It's basically a WWII propaganda/Lang/Hitchcock/noir/detective/thriller/mystery/romance mash-up that works on just about every level. Lang has his own take on the situation, but the parallels between this story and Hitchcock's standard narrative are numerous. It is kind of disguised as a propaganda picture, but I have to say it easily could have been made Hitchcock. 5: Fritz Lang has a very recognizable visual style and this is a perfect example of him on form. 3

Gaspar O (mx)

He made this one more tolerable for me. The Alamo tour guide was fairly awesome. That all being said, there were elements that were entertaining, there was a small amount of gore and plenty of humor, both intentional and not. ly bad as well. . . The "special" effects were amazing. This should have been called Bad CGI Chupacabra vs Ponch On Bad Green Screen

Hollie T (ru)

Made me miss my ugly blue sweater with rainbow stripes down the sleeves. A perfect little time capsule of the late 1990s, my high school days. I wonder if there was any sort of legal repercussions as the music for Kolobos bears a strong resemblance to Goblin's score for Suspiria

James H (fr)

He is well cast. It's hardly that bad! I found some of it funny, it doesn't always work, but it is watchable and I though the cast did a good job, especially Rick Moranis. Jeez, the critics were brutal to this film

JohnnyLee T (br)

Acting is good - problem is with screenplay and staging/direction I suspect. Got interested in modern characters then taken back to WW2 and Burma. Patchy. Lacks real conviction

Mary B (de)

Not my kind of movie. Not bad, but too spooky for me

Max G (de)

stars. Overall a 9/10 or 4. The only bad thing is the ending leaves a lot of sub-plots unresolved. A fun film with great dance numbers and songs