Yeh Dil Kisko Doon
Anand was born richest in riches but poorest in love and kindness. He was hungry for not only love but for any act of kindness...
- Stars:Shashi Kapoor,
You may also like
Yeh Dil Kisko Doon torrent reviews
Adam W (es) wrote: Is zellweger capable of starring in anything other than sickbag romcoms?oh by the way there isnt much comedy in this..
Ryan B (jp) wrote: Powerful sophomore effort from emerging indie filmmaker Ava DuVernay. Strong, poignant, and often captivating in it's brutal honesty, DuVernay's storytelling is revealing without being showy; precise but universal. It's a gift that was on full display in her first film, I Will Follow, and she builds on that sense of emotionality in Middle of Nowhere by expanding the scope of her story while keeping in tact the specificity of character that made her debut such a revelation.
Brian B (au) wrote: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle must be rolling over in his grave. This HORRIBLE alleged retelling of Doyle's classic story is full of horrible actiing, bargain basement computer animation and inept writing. How has Bruce Boxleitner fallen to have to do crap like this???
Andrew C (kr) wrote: Mostly very interesting. From the non-sensical vitriol of the right, to the embarrasing idolism of Michael Moore on the left, its all a bit scary (and funny somehow). But its let down by some unecessary padding in the middle.
Tio B (fr) wrote: Apparently, the word of choice to describe this film is "incoherent." But are nightmares coherent? Tomaselli nails dream logic with this piece, and it's weird and creepy as hell. HORROR is postmodern cinema, and well worth checking out.
Brittany P (br) wrote: I can't get these kids out of my head. This film is incredibly powerful. See it.
(de) wrote: Never have I seen a film more imaginative. Every character feels real because none of them are perfect, and no one character has a sole personality trait.
Chelsea K (ru) wrote: I liked the movie, but I also found that it could have had a better story line, I found it to be a little confusing the first time I watched it. I also didn't like how it potrayed the " naming ceremony", it was funny but if someone who's not native could get the wrong idea about our ceremonies. Over all I think the movie is good for a laugh but its not realistic.
Evan H (br) wrote: This movie isn't top notch entertainment, but it's still a treat to see! It has Michael J. Fox, Nathan Lane, and Cyndi Lauper in it, so all the more reason to see this!!
Justin A (es) wrote: I remembered liking it a lot more than I did this second time around. The characters are paper thin and the script is... well, there isn't much of a script. This is all about the make-up and special effects and they are actually pretty good at times. Some of the sequences are laughable though (the grenade explosion outside the plane at the beginning and the final sequence that ends with the dog casually walking up and eating a mess were two "so bad they're funny" scenes). I can see why I forgot most of this movie though, as there just isn't much to it. I remembered the looks of some of the zombies and scarecrows, but other than that there just isn't much to much to write about. I didn't need to know why the scarecrows were alive and killing, but with such a thin plot at least give me interesting characters. Also, (and maybe I just misheard) the mercenaries/bank robbers stole $3 million, but have all this fancy equipment. I'm sure $3 million is great to live off of, but for all those rifles and high tech gear, I imagine it wasn't cheap just to set up their plan. What exactly was their profit after costs? Yeah, it's just a movie, I know, but that tells you where my mind was at early in the movie when that's all I could think of.
Jonathan M (kr) wrote: The politics of "Walker" (against the use of contras in Nicaragua) is extremely ham-fisted, but the ways it goes about it (bizarre anachronisms, a kind of surrealist plot and some genuinely funny moments) is actually pretty entertaining. Also, "blood spurting."
Lanky Man P (mx) wrote: Awesome cheesy 80s horror...
Bradley K (br) wrote: Pretty atrociously obtuse plot and very questionable acting at times, but man us the soundtrack great. It's worth it for the performances alone.
RoxanaAlice C (gb) wrote: Ok, i saw only half of it and the rest with fast-forward and it didn't get me. It was to dramatic and maybe not uderstandable for me
Orlok W (us) wrote: Hilarious and bloodthirsty - a great cult film--Awesome Early Splatterfest!!
bill s (fr) wrote: Just a well made,well acted funny war fable.....they'd have to cut the s#$t out of the script to remake it today though.