Zero

Zero

A story about love and hatred, about those who cheat and who are cheated, about violence and sex and surprising secrets which we learn within these strange twenty four hours.

A story about love and hatred, about those who cheat and who are cheated, about violence and sex and surprising secrets which we learn within these strange twenty four hours. . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki

LinksNameQualitySeedersLeechersSize
Download   Zero.2009.DVDRiP.XviD-DvFDVDRip36291.39 GB
Download   Otoko wa tsurai yo: Torajiro yumemakuraOther42414 GB
Download   Zero.2009.DVDRiP.XviD-DvFDVDRip44341.37 GB
Download   Zero.2009.rus.pol.KINOSREDAOther40471.52 GB

Zero torrent reviews

Eliabeth B (mx) wrote: This movie was very funny. Everybody in the theater was laughing!!

Ronald M (au) wrote: This movie started off fine because it didn't feature too much Jamie Kennedy. It was also about Hecklers. After a half hour though, Hecklers are left behind and it's just about movie critics, specifically Jamie Kennedy's critics. Is it news that he makes terrible movies that nobody likes? Why did he need to make this film to 'discover' that which we already knew? Waste of time.

Steve S (mx) wrote: It's an independent film that didn't do much harm; though it didn't do much good.

Steve H (mx) wrote: sounds like another super natual evil devil Worshiping movie to me. Gets a {F -.}

Valerie P (gb) wrote: This was a touching movie about a troubled teen who forms a unique friendship with a lonely middle-aged shopkeeper. It's a very different role for LeeLee, who played an angsty Goth quite well. It was a nice little story.

Matt B (es) wrote: I never liked Beavis and Butt-Head to begin with. I don't know why I wasted my time with this movie.

Brian S (au) wrote: The movie's trailer claims it to be a "cinematic achievement", but no, it's a piece of shit. That cheesy tongue-and-cheek gore and story may of worked for the early 60's, but this one was released in 1970, so you expect more, but it doesn't deliver. The acting is atrocious, and the gore effects are classic campy Herschell Gordon Lewis stuff, really badly done. The story itself is just so ludicrious and a little incoherent. I was practicaly just waiting for the flick to end. Not recommended.

David S (es) wrote: just kind of alright.

Yuri B (mx) wrote: Something about Hugh Grant... always seemed to enjoy his performances.

Jack N (de) wrote: I saw this film pretty much because it was mentioned in a Patton Oswalt stand up routine.I expected it to be terrible, but fun. Y'know, a film so bad and poorly conceived you can sit there with two robots and make fun of it.Well...ouch.It actually transcended that level of bad and went to a all new level of bad that's not even all that fun to mock. It's just kinda sad. Most of the dialogue are actually voice overs and only actor William Russ in his first film role ever went on to do anything else. And really? That's a good thing but this film isn't even fun campy crap. It's just long meandering boring high concept low budget crap that's this weird mix of exploitation, silly themed horror, documentary, and insomnia cure.