Zodiac: Signs of the Apocalypse

Zodiac: Signs of the Apocalypse

When a mysterious planet crosses the sun, global catastrophes are unleashed. A rogue scientist is the key to deciphering the symbols and humanity's only chance at survival.

Archaeology Professor Neil Martin hasn't done field work in fifteen years, ever since his divorce and needing to take care of his son, Colin. Now twenty, Colin convinces his father to accept an assignment offered by Kathryn Keen of Poly Dynamics, a research company that tries to find solutions to global issues. That assignment, which continues the work of a now deceased Professor Robert Bowles, looks into an unusual find in a lead mine in Peru. After traveling to the site with Colin and Kathryn, Neil believes the find, a tablet with some astrological glyphs, including one of Planet X - the ninth planet - is part of a key to some recent natural and destructive phenomenon, including a couple of meteor storms, one which killed Dr. Bowles and one which almost killed Colin. They also uncover a seemingly radioactive stone buried behind the tablet. He believes the stone and the tablet are only parts of the puzzle to the reason behind the destructive natural phenomenon, twelve which will ... . You can read more in Google, Youtube, Wiki


Zodiac: Signs of the Apocalypse torrent reviews

Anana H (us) wrote: Beautiful scenery, crack-head cinematography. It's so BAD, that it's good. It's like the joy you get watching Attack of the Killer Tomatoes.

Jesse O (br) wrote: I'll get this out of the way immediately, but who thought it was a good idea to make this film as long as it was? It's over 90 minutes long and it, at the very least, should've been 20-25 minutes shorter. It shouldn't have been longer than 75 minutes, credits included. I say this because, it's obvious that this film is technically no good, it's clear this was made on a very minuscule budget and not a lot of care was taken on some of the technical aspects of the film. Not that it matters, because this film is all about the absurdly, over-the-top Japanese humor. You'd only get this brand of Battle Royale hybrid with a sports film from Japan. In many ways this is, very obviously, a labor of love. They set out to make the craziest and most ridiculous movie they could with this concept. And it's safe to say that they succeeded in their mission. The problem is, while I did laugh uproariously at some of the film's most ridiculous scenes, since the movie is so long, there's some really long stretches of time where the film is just bad. You don't laugh with it even though it is practically begging you to. The problem is that the baseball game the two teams play goes on for WAY too long. It pretty much, almost, kills the movie. I think it finds its way back on track eventually, but it was really rough going for a while there. Then again, if you don't appreciate this type of humor then it'll be rough going from beginning to end. But it's very obvious that there's no way this film should've been as long as it was I still found myself laughing at this film, which is what it wants if you really think about it. It's not a good movie, it's not Little Miss Sunshine but it does provide some really ridiculous moments. For example, the main character's brother goes on a murderous rampage after Jubeh, the main character, accidentally kills his father with a super-powered, fireball pitch. Jubeh's brother's murderous rampage is also committed with a baseball. So you can imagine how absurd the film really is. This is a bad movie if we're honest. It's an overlong, poorly acted, poorly edited, mess of a movie. Yet I still enjoyed myself. What does that say about me?

Frank R (ag) wrote: Very understated in its tone and while feeling more like a series premiere than a standalone movie, it has an enjoyable organic feel to it with characters that I found easy to connect and identify with.

Sushanna M (br) wrote: it's less of a thriller and more of a character study of Ryu, the assassin. i enjoyed it. it had a Lost in Translation feel to it. great music and direction by Coixet. visually rich, sensual, and distant. you always feel as if you're on the cusp of knowing something important. i think that's what ultimately held my attention until the very end.

Rui G (it) wrote: Prometia no inicio, mas afinal muito fraco.

Joseph H (gb) wrote: Doesn't seem interesting.

Gabriel Z (br) wrote: This is an interesting enough documentary, but it's not as well made as it could have been. I guess what I am trying to say is that it was kind of boring.


Chelsea B (gb) wrote: Probably the best of the Mormon movies, this one has just got it all. It's funny, entertaining, inspiring, and spiritual all at the same time.

shelly b (us) wrote: Own the alice in wonderland part of this version, have yet to see this second part yet though

Steve G (ca) wrote: Makes the barbarism of Rome seem sophisticated.My takeaway: THE KING OF CARTOONS!Is it just me, or is this Spartacus?All the chicks are crazy about Demetrius. People who don't like this are descendants of Caligula. I hate the notion that only after seeing a miracle can you believe. And you're forced to stop when good things stop happening.

Stella D (jp) wrote: i'm a big sucker for briitish war propaganda and this is one of the best. only the second film for powell and pressburger as the archers and it's clear they make a great team. the film involves a bomber crew forced to bail out over holland and try to make it home with help from the dutch resistance. gripping stuff